比较香港青少年和成人对EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状况的偏好。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kailu Wang, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Annie Wai-Ling Cheung, Amy Yuen-Kwan Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
{"title":"比较香港青少年和成人对EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状况的偏好。","authors":"Kailu Wang, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Annie Wai-Ling Cheung, Amy Yuen-Kwan Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The EuroQol EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol suggests eliciting adult preferences from the perspective of a 10-year-old child. However, further research on whether it is feasible to elicit adolescent preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and how adolescent preferences compare with adult preferences is needed. This study aimed to compare preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and survey response behaviors between adolescents and adults in the general population of Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional face-to-face surveys were conducted between December 2018 and July 2023 with adolescents and adults in Hong Kong. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were used to elicit adolescent preferences from their own perspective and adult preferences from a 10-year-old child's perspective for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. Mixed logit models estimated the relative importance attribute levels for comparison between adolescents and adults using separate models for each group or a pooled model combining responses. Survey response behaviors were also analyzed by comparing the dominant task responses and feedback to DCE tasks between adolescents and adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DCE responses from 776 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years and 1001 adults were used in the analysis after exclusions. For both groups, the most important dimension was pain/discomfort, followed by worried/sad/unhappy, usual activities, mobility, and self-care. Adolescents placed greater importance on mobility and self-care, while valuing pain/discomfort and usual activities less. Significant differences in relative importance of levels across all dimensions between the 2 groups were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents showed different preference weightings compared with adults but reported greater challenges in completing the DCE tasks. These findings suggest that including adolescents in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health state is feasible; however, data provided by this group can be of lower data quality than adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Adolescent and Adult Preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States in Hong Kong.\",\"authors\":\"Kailu Wang, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Annie Wai-Ling Cheung, Amy Yuen-Kwan Wong, Eng-Kiong Yeoh, Eliza Lai-Yi Wong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The EuroQol EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol suggests eliciting adult preferences from the perspective of a 10-year-old child. However, further research on whether it is feasible to elicit adolescent preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and how adolescent preferences compare with adult preferences is needed. This study aimed to compare preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and survey response behaviors between adolescents and adults in the general population of Hong Kong.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional face-to-face surveys were conducted between December 2018 and July 2023 with adolescents and adults in Hong Kong. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were used to elicit adolescent preferences from their own perspective and adult preferences from a 10-year-old child's perspective for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. Mixed logit models estimated the relative importance attribute levels for comparison between adolescents and adults using separate models for each group or a pooled model combining responses. Survey response behaviors were also analyzed by comparing the dominant task responses and feedback to DCE tasks between adolescents and adults.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DCE responses from 776 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years and 1001 adults were used in the analysis after exclusions. For both groups, the most important dimension was pain/discomfort, followed by worried/sad/unhappy, usual activities, mobility, and self-care. Adolescents placed greater importance on mobility and self-care, while valuing pain/discomfort and usual activities less. Significant differences in relative importance of levels across all dimensions between the 2 groups were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adolescents showed different preference weightings compared with adults but reported greater challenges in completing the DCE tasks. These findings suggest that including adolescents in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health state is feasible; however, data provided by this group can be of lower data quality than adults.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.005\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:EuroQol EQ-5D-Y-3L评价方案建议从10岁儿童的角度引出成人的偏好。然而,是否可以诱导青少年对EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状态的偏好,以及青少年偏好与成人偏好的比较,还需要进一步的研究。本研究旨在比较香港青少年和成人对EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状态的偏好和调查反应行为。方法:2018年12月至2023年7月,对香港青少年和成年人进行横断面面对面调查。采用离散选择实验(DCEs),分别从青少年和成人的角度对EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状态进行选择。混合logit模型估计了青少年和成年人之间比较的相对重要属性水平,使用每组单独的模型或组合响应的混合模型。通过比较青少年和成人的主导任务反应和对DCE任务的反馈,分析调查反应行为。结果:排除后,776名12-17岁青少年和1001名成年人的DCE应答被用于分析。对于这两组人来说,最重要的维度是疼痛/不适,其次是担心/悲伤/不快乐、日常活动、流动性和自我保健。青少年更重视活动能力和自我保健,而不太重视疼痛/不适和日常活动。观察到两组之间所有维度水平的相对重要性存在显著差异。结论:与成年人相比,青少年表现出不同的偏好权重,但在完成DCE任务时报告了更大的挑战。这些发现表明,将青少年纳入EQ-5D-Y-3L健康状态评估是可行的,但该群体提供的数据质量可能低于成人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing Adolescent and Adult Preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L Health States in Hong Kong.

Objectives: The EuroQol EQ-5D-Y-3L valuation protocol suggests eliciting adult preferences from the perspective of a 10-year-old child. However, further research on whether it is feasible to elicit adolescent preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and how adolescent preferences compare with adult preferences is needed. This study aimed to compare preferences for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states and survey response behaviors between adolescents and adults in the general population of Hong Kong.

Methods: Cross-sectional face-to-face surveys were conducted between December 2018 and July 2023 with adolescents and adults in Hong Kong. Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) were used to elicit adolescent preferences from their own perspective and adult preferences from a 10-year-old child's perspective for EQ-5D-Y-3L health states. Mixed logit models estimated the relative importance attribute levels for comparison between adolescents and adults using separate models for each group or a pooled model combining responses. Survey response behaviors were also analyzed by comparing the dominant task responses and feedback to DCE tasks between adolescents and adults.

Results: DCE responses from 776 adolescents aged 12 to 17 years and 1001 adults were used in the analysis after exclusions. For both groups, the most important dimension was pain/discomfort, followed by worried/sad/unhappy, usual activities, mobility, and self-care. Adolescents placed greater importance on mobility and self-care, while valuing pain/discomfort and usual activities less. Significant differences in relative importance of levels across all dimensions between the 2 groups were observed.

Conclusions: Adolescents showed different preference weightings compared with adults but reported greater challenges in completing the DCE tasks. These findings suggest that including adolescents in the valuation of EQ-5D-Y-3L health state is feasible; however, data provided by this group can be of lower data quality than adults.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信