用人工智能预测医疗保健利用结果:大范围回顾。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Carlos Gallego-Moll, Lucía A Carrasco-Ribelles, Marc Casajuana, Laia Maynou, Pablo Arocena, Concepción Violán, Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo
{"title":"用人工智能预测医疗保健利用结果:大范围回顾。","authors":"Carlos Gallego-Moll, Lucía A Carrasco-Ribelles, Marc Casajuana, Laia Maynou, Pablo Arocena, Concepción Violán, Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To broadly map the research landscape to identify trends, gaps, and opportunities in data sets, methodologies, outcomes, and reporting standards for artificial intelligence (AI)-based healthcare utilization prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We searched 3 major international databases (from inception to January 2025) for studies applying AI in predictive healthcare utilization. Extracted data were categorized into data sets characteristics, AI methods and performance metrics, predicted outcomes, and adherence to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) + AI reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1116 records, 121 met inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (62%). No study incorporated all 6 relevant variable groups: demographic, socioeconomic, health status, perceived need, provider characteristics, and prior utilization. Only 7 studies included 5 of these groups. The main data sources were electronic health records (60%) and claims (28%). Ensemble models were the most frequently used (66.9%), whereas deep learning models were less common (16.5%). AI methods were primarily used to predict future events (90.1%), with hospitalizations (57.9%) and visits (33.1%) being the most predicted outcomes. Adherence to general reporting standards was moderate; however, compliance with AI-specific TRIPOD + AI items was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should broaden predicted outcomes to include process- and logistics-oriented events, extend applications beyond prediction-such as cohort selection and matching-and explore underused AI methods, including distance-based algorithms and deep neural networks. Strengthening adherence to TRIPOD-AI reporting guidelines is also essential to enhance the reliability and impact of AI in healthcare planning and economic evaluation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting Healthcare Utilization Outcomes With Artificial Intelligence: A Large Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Gallego-Moll, Lucía A Carrasco-Ribelles, Marc Casajuana, Laia Maynou, Pablo Arocena, Concepción Violán, Edurne Zabaleta-Del-Olmo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To broadly map the research landscape to identify trends, gaps, and opportunities in data sets, methodologies, outcomes, and reporting standards for artificial intelligence (AI)-based healthcare utilization prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We searched 3 major international databases (from inception to January 2025) for studies applying AI in predictive healthcare utilization. Extracted data were categorized into data sets characteristics, AI methods and performance metrics, predicted outcomes, and adherence to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) + AI reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1116 records, 121 met inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (62%). No study incorporated all 6 relevant variable groups: demographic, socioeconomic, health status, perceived need, provider characteristics, and prior utilization. Only 7 studies included 5 of these groups. The main data sources were electronic health records (60%) and claims (28%). Ensemble models were the most frequently used (66.9%), whereas deep learning models were less common (16.5%). AI methods were primarily used to predict future events (90.1%), with hospitalizations (57.9%) and visits (33.1%) being the most predicted outcomes. Adherence to general reporting standards was moderate; however, compliance with AI-specific TRIPOD + AI items was limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Future research should broaden predicted outcomes to include process- and logistics-oriented events, extend applications beyond prediction-such as cohort selection and matching-and explore underused AI methods, including distance-based algorithms and deep neural networks. Strengthening adherence to TRIPOD-AI reporting guidelines is also essential to enhance the reliability and impact of AI in healthcare planning and economic evaluation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.007\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:广泛地描绘研究前景,以确定基于人工智能的医疗保健利用预测的数据集、方法、结果和报告标准方面的趋势、差距和机会。方法:我们按照乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法进行了范围审查。我们检索了三个主要的国际数据库(从成立到2025年1月),寻找将人工智能应用于预测性医疗保健利用的研究。提取的数据分为数据集特征、人工智能方法和性能指标、预测结果以及对TRIPOD+AI报告指南的遵守情况。结果:1116例病例中,符合纳入标准的121例。大多数是在美国进行的(62%)。没有一项研究纳入了所有六个相关变量组:人口统计学、社会经济、健康状况、感知需求、提供者特征和既往使用情况。只有7项研究包括了其中的5个群体。主要数据来源是电子健康记录(60%)和索赔(28%)。集成模型是最常用的(66.9%),而深度学习模型则不太常用(16.5%)。人工智能方法主要用于预测未来事件(90.1%),其中住院(57.9%)和就诊(33.1%)是预测最多的结果。对一般报告标准的遵守程度中等,但对AI特定TRIPOD+AI项目的遵守程度有限。结论:未来的研究应扩大预测结果,包括以过程和物流为导向的事件,将应用扩展到预测之外,如队列选择和匹配,并探索未充分利用的人工智能方法,包括基于距离的算法和深度神经网络。加强对TRIPOD-AI报告准则的遵守对于提高AI在医疗保健规划和经济评估中的可靠性和影响也至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting Healthcare Utilization Outcomes With Artificial Intelligence: A Large Scoping Review.

Objectives: To broadly map the research landscape to identify trends, gaps, and opportunities in data sets, methodologies, outcomes, and reporting standards for artificial intelligence (AI)-based healthcare utilization prediction.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review following the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology. We searched 3 major international databases (from inception to January 2025) for studies applying AI in predictive healthcare utilization. Extracted data were categorized into data sets characteristics, AI methods and performance metrics, predicted outcomes, and adherence to the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) + AI reporting guidelines.

Results: Among 1116 records, 121 met inclusion criteria. Most were conducted in the United States (62%). No study incorporated all 6 relevant variable groups: demographic, socioeconomic, health status, perceived need, provider characteristics, and prior utilization. Only 7 studies included 5 of these groups. The main data sources were electronic health records (60%) and claims (28%). Ensemble models were the most frequently used (66.9%), whereas deep learning models were less common (16.5%). AI methods were primarily used to predict future events (90.1%), with hospitalizations (57.9%) and visits (33.1%) being the most predicted outcomes. Adherence to general reporting standards was moderate; however, compliance with AI-specific TRIPOD + AI items was limited.

Conclusions: Future research should broaden predicted outcomes to include process- and logistics-oriented events, extend applications beyond prediction-such as cohort selection and matching-and explore underused AI methods, including distance-based algorithms and deep neural networks. Strengthening adherence to TRIPOD-AI reporting guidelines is also essential to enhance the reliability and impact of AI in healthcare planning and economic evaluation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信