本科医学培训不同阶段情境判断测验与职业素养缺失风险的队列研究

IF 5.2 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Gurvinder Sahota, Paul A Tiffin, Daniel Smith, Edward Tyrrell, Mandy Hampshire, Jaspal Taggar
{"title":"本科医学培训不同阶段情境判断测验与职业素养缺失风险的队列研究","authors":"Gurvinder Sahota, Paul A Tiffin, Daniel Smith, Edward Tyrrell, Mandy Hampshire, Jaspal Taggar","doi":"10.1111/medu.70020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying medical students at risk of professionalism lapses is critical for future patient safety. Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) are commonly used to assess procedural knowledge of professionalism. Evidence suggests SJT scores can predict professionalism lapses, though longitudinal data across different stages of medical training are lacking. This study investigates the relationship between SJT performance at three points in pre-qualification medical education and professionalism lapses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted using linked data from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) and the University of Nottingham. Data were available for 705 students who sat a professionalism-focused SJT in their second year (2016 to 2018). Professionalism lapses were identified using concern forms. The study used scores from three SJTs administered at different stages: the University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT) at application; a Nottingham Medical School (NMS) test mid-training, and the UK Foundation Programme (UKFP) SJT, at the end of medical school. The relationship between SJT scores and the odds of a professionalism lapse was modelled using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance on the NMS SJT was statistically significantly associated with the odds of professionalism lapses (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.64, p = 0.001) even after adjusting for educational and cognitive performance (OR 0.68, p = 0.005). The UKFP SJT scores showed a univariable (0.66, p = 0.006) but not an independent relationship with the outcome (OR 0.77, p = 0.14). The UCAT SJT scores were not statistically significantly predictive of professional lapses, on univariable (OR 0.85, p = 0.34) or multivariable analysis (OR 0.92, p = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SJTs can support medical professionalism in students. They are likely to be most effective in this context when they are administered during training, rather than as a selection measure for entry to medical school. Moreover, SJTs designed to have specific, professionalism-focused content and a limited cognitive load are most likely to add unique value in this respect.</p>","PeriodicalId":18370,"journal":{"name":"Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Situational judgement testing at different stages of undergraduate medical training and the risk of professionalism lapses: A cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Gurvinder Sahota, Paul A Tiffin, Daniel Smith, Edward Tyrrell, Mandy Hampshire, Jaspal Taggar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/medu.70020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying medical students at risk of professionalism lapses is critical for future patient safety. Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) are commonly used to assess procedural knowledge of professionalism. Evidence suggests SJT scores can predict professionalism lapses, though longitudinal data across different stages of medical training are lacking. This study investigates the relationship between SJT performance at three points in pre-qualification medical education and professionalism lapses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A longitudinal study was conducted using linked data from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) and the University of Nottingham. Data were available for 705 students who sat a professionalism-focused SJT in their second year (2016 to 2018). Professionalism lapses were identified using concern forms. The study used scores from three SJTs administered at different stages: the University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT) at application; a Nottingham Medical School (NMS) test mid-training, and the UK Foundation Programme (UKFP) SJT, at the end of medical school. The relationship between SJT scores and the odds of a professionalism lapse was modelled using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Performance on the NMS SJT was statistically significantly associated with the odds of professionalism lapses (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.64, p = 0.001) even after adjusting for educational and cognitive performance (OR 0.68, p = 0.005). The UKFP SJT scores showed a univariable (0.66, p = 0.006) but not an independent relationship with the outcome (OR 0.77, p = 0.14). The UCAT SJT scores were not statistically significantly predictive of professional lapses, on univariable (OR 0.85, p = 0.34) or multivariable analysis (OR 0.92, p = 0.66).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SJTs can support medical professionalism in students. They are likely to be most effective in this context when they are administered during training, rather than as a selection measure for entry to medical school. Moreover, SJTs designed to have specific, professionalism-focused content and a limited cognitive load are most likely to add unique value in this respect.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Education\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70020\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.70020","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:识别医学生的职业操失风险对未来的患者安全至关重要。情境判断测试(sjt)通常用于评估程序性专业知识。有证据表明,SJT分数可以预测职业素养的缺失,尽管缺乏跨医学培训不同阶段的纵向数据。本研究旨在探讨资格预审医学教育中三个时点的SJT绩效与专业素养的关系。方法:利用英国医学教育数据库(UKMED)和诺丁汉大学的相关数据进行纵向研究。数据来自705名学生,他们在2016年至2018年的第二年参加了以专业为重点的SJT。使用关注表单识别专业性失误。该研究使用了三个不同阶段的sjt分数:申请时的大学临床能力倾向测试(UCAT);诺丁汉医学院(NMS)中期培训测试和英国基础课程(UKFP) SJT,在医学院结束时。SJT分数与专业失误几率之间的关系采用逻辑回归建模。结果:即使在调整了教育和认知表现(OR 0.68, p = 0.005)后,NMS SJT的表现与专业精神缺失的几率也有统计学意义上的显著相关(比值比[OR] 0.64, p = 0.001)。UKFP SJT得分显示为单变量(0.66,p = 0.006),但与结果没有独立关系(OR 0.77, p = 0.14)。在单变量分析(OR 0.85, p = 0.34)或多变量分析(OR 0.92, p = 0.66)中,UCAT SJT分数对职业失误的预测没有统计学意义。结论:sjt可以促进学生的医学专业精神。在这种情况下,如果在培训期间进行,而不是作为进入医学院的一项选择措施,它们可能是最有效的。此外,设计为具有特定的、专业的内容和有限的认知负荷的SJTs最有可能在这方面增加独特的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Situational judgement testing at different stages of undergraduate medical training and the risk of professionalism lapses: A cohort study.

Introduction: Identifying medical students at risk of professionalism lapses is critical for future patient safety. Situational Judgement Tests (SJTs) are commonly used to assess procedural knowledge of professionalism. Evidence suggests SJT scores can predict professionalism lapses, though longitudinal data across different stages of medical training are lacking. This study investigates the relationship between SJT performance at three points in pre-qualification medical education and professionalism lapses.

Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted using linked data from the UK Medical Education Database (UKMED) and the University of Nottingham. Data were available for 705 students who sat a professionalism-focused SJT in their second year (2016 to 2018). Professionalism lapses were identified using concern forms. The study used scores from three SJTs administered at different stages: the University Clinical Aptitude Test (UCAT) at application; a Nottingham Medical School (NMS) test mid-training, and the UK Foundation Programme (UKFP) SJT, at the end of medical school. The relationship between SJT scores and the odds of a professionalism lapse was modelled using logistic regression.

Results: Performance on the NMS SJT was statistically significantly associated with the odds of professionalism lapses (Odds Ratio [OR] 0.64, p = 0.001) even after adjusting for educational and cognitive performance (OR 0.68, p = 0.005). The UKFP SJT scores showed a univariable (0.66, p = 0.006) but not an independent relationship with the outcome (OR 0.77, p = 0.14). The UCAT SJT scores were not statistically significantly predictive of professional lapses, on univariable (OR 0.85, p = 0.34) or multivariable analysis (OR 0.92, p = 0.66).

Conclusions: SJTs can support medical professionalism in students. They are likely to be most effective in this context when they are administered during training, rather than as a selection measure for entry to medical school. Moreover, SJTs designed to have specific, professionalism-focused content and a limited cognitive load are most likely to add unique value in this respect.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Education
Medical Education 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Education seeks to be the pre-eminent journal in the field of education for health care professionals, and publishes material of the highest quality, reflecting world wide or provocative issues and perspectives. The journal welcomes high quality papers on all aspects of health professional education including; -undergraduate education -postgraduate training -continuing professional development -interprofessional education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信