在解决问题时眼睛和手的协同表达揭示了分层组织的计划。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q3 NEUROSCIENCES
Journal of neurophysiology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-21 DOI:10.1152/jn.00188.2025
Mattia Eluchans, Antonella Maselli, Gian Luca Lancia, Giovanni Pezzulo
{"title":"在解决问题时眼睛和手的协同表达揭示了分层组织的计划。","authors":"Mattia Eluchans, Antonella Maselli, Gian Luca Lancia, Giovanni Pezzulo","doi":"10.1152/jn.00188.2025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During everyday activities, such as preparing a cup of coffee or traveling across cities, we often plan ahead and execute sequences of actions. Yet how such planning unfolds when solutions must be formed from scratch, without external cues or routines, remains unclear. This study examines how participants coordinate gaze and cursor movements while solving path-tracing problems on a grid with multiple targets. By focusing on the action execution phase, we aimed to probe the structure of the gaze-cursor plans that participants used to solve the tasks. Our analysis reveals three main findings. First, consistent with previous studies, participants segment the problem into sequences of gestures, defined as the task execution (gaze and cursor movements) in the time interval between the onset of two consecutive fixations. Typically, within each gesture, gaze focuses on a target and remains fixed until the cursor reaches it, then shifts to the next target. Second, both gaze position, while fixating on the current target, and the kinematics of cursor movement leading up to the current target allow prediction of the next cursor movement's direction, revealing coarticulation in both cursor-cursor and gaze-cursor movements. Third, and most interestingly, the position of the gaze around the current target aligns with the direction of the next saccade, revealing coarticulation between successive gaze fixations. Together, these findings show that participants break the problem into gesture sequences and plan multiple eye and cursor movements in advance to efficiently reach both the current and upcoming gesture targets. This suggests a hierarchical planning strategy, with participants planning ahead at two levels: gesture targets and cursor movements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Coarticulation, the modulation of an action's execution based on upcoming actions, offers a valuable window into covert planning, typically defined as the goal-directed concatenation of actions. Most prior studies have examined coarticulation in instructed, cued, or routinized sequences. In contrast, we provide a comprehensive characterization of coarticulation in both gaze behavior and hand kinematics (via cursor movements) during a planning task where participants must generate novel solutions from scratch on each trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":16563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurophysiology","volume":" ","pages":"985-997"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Eye and hand coarticulation during problem-solving reveals hierarchically organized planning.\",\"authors\":\"Mattia Eluchans, Antonella Maselli, Gian Luca Lancia, Giovanni Pezzulo\",\"doi\":\"10.1152/jn.00188.2025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>During everyday activities, such as preparing a cup of coffee or traveling across cities, we often plan ahead and execute sequences of actions. Yet how such planning unfolds when solutions must be formed from scratch, without external cues or routines, remains unclear. This study examines how participants coordinate gaze and cursor movements while solving path-tracing problems on a grid with multiple targets. By focusing on the action execution phase, we aimed to probe the structure of the gaze-cursor plans that participants used to solve the tasks. Our analysis reveals three main findings. First, consistent with previous studies, participants segment the problem into sequences of gestures, defined as the task execution (gaze and cursor movements) in the time interval between the onset of two consecutive fixations. Typically, within each gesture, gaze focuses on a target and remains fixed until the cursor reaches it, then shifts to the next target. Second, both gaze position, while fixating on the current target, and the kinematics of cursor movement leading up to the current target allow prediction of the next cursor movement's direction, revealing coarticulation in both cursor-cursor and gaze-cursor movements. Third, and most interestingly, the position of the gaze around the current target aligns with the direction of the next saccade, revealing coarticulation between successive gaze fixations. Together, these findings show that participants break the problem into gesture sequences and plan multiple eye and cursor movements in advance to efficiently reach both the current and upcoming gesture targets. This suggests a hierarchical planning strategy, with participants planning ahead at two levels: gesture targets and cursor movements.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Coarticulation, the modulation of an action's execution based on upcoming actions, offers a valuable window into covert planning, typically defined as the goal-directed concatenation of actions. Most prior studies have examined coarticulation in instructed, cued, or routinized sequences. In contrast, we provide a comprehensive characterization of coarticulation in both gaze behavior and hand kinematics (via cursor movements) during a planning task where participants must generate novel solutions from scratch on each trial.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"985-997\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of neurophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00188.2025\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/21 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00188.2025","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在日常活动中——比如准备一杯咖啡或在城市间旅行——我们经常提前计划并执行一系列的行动。然而,当解决方案必须从零开始,没有外部线索或惯例时,这种计划如何展开,仍不清楚。这项研究考察了参与者在解决有多个目标的网格上的路径跟踪问题时,如何协调目光和光标的移动。通过关注动作执行阶段,我们旨在探索参与者用于解决任务的凝视-光标计划的结构。我们的分析揭示了三个主要发现。首先,与之前的研究一致,参与者将问题划分为手势序列,定义为在两个连续注视开始之间的时间间隔内执行任务(凝视和光标移动)。通常,在每个手势中,目光都聚焦在一个目标上,并保持固定,直到光标到达它,然后转移到下一个目标。其次,注视位置(当盯着当前目标时)和光标移动到当前目标的运动学都允许预测下一个光标移动的方向,揭示光标-光标和凝视-光标移动的协同衔接。第三,也是最有趣的,当前目标周围的凝视位置与下一个扫视的方向一致,揭示了连续凝视注视之间的协同联结。总之,这些发现表明参与者将问题分解成手势序列,并提前计划多次眼睛和光标移动,以有效地到达当前和即将到来的手势目标。这表明了一种分层规划策略,参与者在两个层次上提前规划:手势目标和光标移动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Eye and hand coarticulation during problem-solving reveals hierarchically organized planning.

During everyday activities, such as preparing a cup of coffee or traveling across cities, we often plan ahead and execute sequences of actions. Yet how such planning unfolds when solutions must be formed from scratch, without external cues or routines, remains unclear. This study examines how participants coordinate gaze and cursor movements while solving path-tracing problems on a grid with multiple targets. By focusing on the action execution phase, we aimed to probe the structure of the gaze-cursor plans that participants used to solve the tasks. Our analysis reveals three main findings. First, consistent with previous studies, participants segment the problem into sequences of gestures, defined as the task execution (gaze and cursor movements) in the time interval between the onset of two consecutive fixations. Typically, within each gesture, gaze focuses on a target and remains fixed until the cursor reaches it, then shifts to the next target. Second, both gaze position, while fixating on the current target, and the kinematics of cursor movement leading up to the current target allow prediction of the next cursor movement's direction, revealing coarticulation in both cursor-cursor and gaze-cursor movements. Third, and most interestingly, the position of the gaze around the current target aligns with the direction of the next saccade, revealing coarticulation between successive gaze fixations. Together, these findings show that participants break the problem into gesture sequences and plan multiple eye and cursor movements in advance to efficiently reach both the current and upcoming gesture targets. This suggests a hierarchical planning strategy, with participants planning ahead at two levels: gesture targets and cursor movements.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Coarticulation, the modulation of an action's execution based on upcoming actions, offers a valuable window into covert planning, typically defined as the goal-directed concatenation of actions. Most prior studies have examined coarticulation in instructed, cued, or routinized sequences. In contrast, we provide a comprehensive characterization of coarticulation in both gaze behavior and hand kinematics (via cursor movements) during a planning task where participants must generate novel solutions from scratch on each trial.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of neurophysiology
Journal of neurophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.00%
发文量
255
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurophysiology publishes original articles on the function of the nervous system. All levels of function are included, from the membrane and cell to systems and behavior. Experimental approaches include molecular neurobiology, cell culture and slice preparations, membrane physiology, developmental neurobiology, functional neuroanatomy, neurochemistry, neuropharmacology, systems electrophysiology, imaging and mapping techniques, and behavioral analysis. Experimental preparations may be invertebrate or vertebrate species, including humans. Theoretical studies are acceptable if they are tied closely to the interpretation of experimental data and elucidate principles of broad interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信