医疗保健的利用和障碍和促进医疗保健的年轻人与智障:一个系统的回顾。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Felicia Kreps, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Yvonne Zurynski, Rebecca Mitchell
{"title":"医疗保健的利用和障碍和促进医疗保健的年轻人与智障:一个系统的回顾。","authors":"Felicia Kreps, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Yvonne Zurynski, Rebecca Mitchell","doi":"10.1111/jir.70033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young people with intellectual disability may exhibit poorer general health, higher mortality rates and greater limitations from physical or mental illnesses compared to the general population. It is important to understand how this may relate to healthcare utilisation, including factors influencing healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability. This systematic review aimed to examine healthcare utilisation and to identify common barriers and facilitators of healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched from 1 January 2013 to 31 October 2024 to identify articles that examined healthcare utilisation for young people (≤ 18 years old) with intellectual disability. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers; data from included articles were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included for synthesis and focused on utilisation of hospital inpatient services (n = 22), emergency department (ED) services (n = 13), mental health or psychiatric services (n = 7) and mental health day programmes or outreach services (n = 1). Young people with intellectual disability generally had a higher proportion of hospital admissions, ED visits, hospital length of stay, mental health outpatient visits, mortality, 30-day hospital readmission and complications of care, compared to young people without intellectual disability. Common facilitators of healthcare access and engagement included having health insurance coverage and the use of visual aids and tools for the young person with intellectual disability. Barriers included low socio-economic status and poor provider communication and knowledge about intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are clear disparities in health service outcomes for young people with intellectual disability compared to the general population, which may be influenced by socio-cultural factors and access to knowledgeable and empathetic healthcare providers. Targeted education for healthcare providers may enhance the provision of high-quality care and improve healthcare utilisation and health outcomes for young people with intellectual disability.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare Utilisation and Barriers and Facilitators of Healthcare Access for Young People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Felicia Kreps, Shalini Wijekulasuriya, Yvonne Zurynski, Rebecca Mitchell\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Young people with intellectual disability may exhibit poorer general health, higher mortality rates and greater limitations from physical or mental illnesses compared to the general population. It is important to understand how this may relate to healthcare utilisation, including factors influencing healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability. This systematic review aimed to examine healthcare utilisation and to identify common barriers and facilitators of healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched from 1 January 2013 to 31 October 2024 to identify articles that examined healthcare utilisation for young people (≤ 18 years old) with intellectual disability. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers; data from included articles were critically appraised.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-three studies were included for synthesis and focused on utilisation of hospital inpatient services (n = 22), emergency department (ED) services (n = 13), mental health or psychiatric services (n = 7) and mental health day programmes or outreach services (n = 1). Young people with intellectual disability generally had a higher proportion of hospital admissions, ED visits, hospital length of stay, mental health outpatient visits, mortality, 30-day hospital readmission and complications of care, compared to young people without intellectual disability. Common facilitators of healthcare access and engagement included having health insurance coverage and the use of visual aids and tools for the young person with intellectual disability. Barriers included low socio-economic status and poor provider communication and knowledge about intellectual disability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There are clear disparities in health service outcomes for young people with intellectual disability compared to the general population, which may be influenced by socio-cultural factors and access to knowledgeable and empathetic healthcare providers. Targeted education for healthcare providers may enhance the provision of high-quality care and improve healthcare utilisation and health outcomes for young people with intellectual disability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70033\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70033","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与一般人群相比,患有智力残疾的年轻人可能表现出较差的总体健康状况、较高的死亡率和更大的身体或精神疾病限制。重要的是要了解这与医疗保健利用的关系,包括影响智障年轻人获得医疗保健的因素。本系统综述旨在检查医疗保健利用情况,并确定智力残疾年轻人获得医疗保健的共同障碍和促进因素。方法:检索2013年1月1日至2024年10月31日期间的五个数据库(MEDLINE、Scopus、EMBASE、PsycINFO和CINAHL),以确定研究智力残疾年轻人(≤18岁)医疗保健利用情况的文章。摘要和全文筛选由两位审稿人进行;对纳入文章的数据进行了批判性评价。结果:33项研究被纳入综合研究,重点关注医院住院服务(n = 22)、急诊科(ED)服务(n = 13)、心理健康或精神病学服务(n = 7)和心理健康日计划或外展服务(n = 1)的利用情况。与没有智力残疾的年轻人相比,智力残疾年轻人的住院率、急诊科就诊率、住院时间、精神健康门诊就诊率、死亡率、30天再入院率和护理并发症的比例普遍较高。促进获得和参与医疗保健的常见因素包括拥有医疗保险以及为智障青年使用视觉辅助工具和工具。障碍包括低社会经济地位和提供者沟通不足以及对智力残疾的了解不足。结论:与一般人群相比,智力残疾青年的卫生服务结果存在明显差异,这可能受到社会文化因素和获得知识渊博、善解人意的卫生保健提供者的影响。对医疗保健提供者进行有针对性的教育可以提高高质量护理的提供,并改善对智力残疾年轻人的医疗保健利用和健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare Utilisation and Barriers and Facilitators of Healthcare Access for Young People With Intellectual Disability: A Systematic Review.

Background: Young people with intellectual disability may exhibit poorer general health, higher mortality rates and greater limitations from physical or mental illnesses compared to the general population. It is important to understand how this may relate to healthcare utilisation, including factors influencing healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability. This systematic review aimed to examine healthcare utilisation and to identify common barriers and facilitators of healthcare access for young people with intellectual disability.

Method: Five databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL) were searched from 1 January 2013 to 31 October 2024 to identify articles that examined healthcare utilisation for young people (≤ 18 years old) with intellectual disability. Abstract and full-text screening were conducted by two reviewers; data from included articles were critically appraised.

Results: Thirty-three studies were included for synthesis and focused on utilisation of hospital inpatient services (n = 22), emergency department (ED) services (n = 13), mental health or psychiatric services (n = 7) and mental health day programmes or outreach services (n = 1). Young people with intellectual disability generally had a higher proportion of hospital admissions, ED visits, hospital length of stay, mental health outpatient visits, mortality, 30-day hospital readmission and complications of care, compared to young people without intellectual disability. Common facilitators of healthcare access and engagement included having health insurance coverage and the use of visual aids and tools for the young person with intellectual disability. Barriers included low socio-economic status and poor provider communication and knowledge about intellectual disability.

Conclusions: There are clear disparities in health service outcomes for young people with intellectual disability compared to the general population, which may be influenced by socio-cultural factors and access to knowledgeable and empathetic healthcare providers. Targeted education for healthcare providers may enhance the provision of high-quality care and improve healthcare utilisation and health outcomes for young people with intellectual disability.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信