风险网络购物行为:压力反应在目标导向行为向刺激-反应习惯转变中的作用。

IF 6.2 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Journal of Behavioral Addictions Pub Date : 2025-09-03 Print Date: 2025-09-30 DOI:10.1556/2006.2025.00062
Tobias A Thomas, Anna M Schmid, Nicolas K Erdal, Stefan Blümel, Silke M Müller, Christian J Merz, Oliver T Wolf, Matthias Brand, Sabine Steins-Loeber, Astrid Müller
{"title":"风险网络购物行为:压力反应在目标导向行为向刺激-反应习惯转变中的作用。","authors":"Tobias A Thomas, Anna M Schmid, Nicolas K Erdal, Stefan Blümel, Silke M Müller, Christian J Merz, Oliver T Wolf, Matthias Brand, Sabine Steins-Loeber, Astrid Müller","doi":"10.1556/2006.2025.00062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>There is a lack of research on the stress-related transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits in (early stages of) online buying-shopping disorder (BSD). This study investigated the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effect after reward devaluation (PIT-dev) as indicator of habitual behavior and its modulation by acute stress in individuals with risky (online) buying-shopping (r-BSh).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with r-BSh (n = 67) and a control group (n = 67) underwent a PIT paradigm with devaluation procedure. A stress induction/control procedure was administered after the first part of the paradigm. Four salivary samples (alpha-amylase, sAA; cortisol, sCort) and subjective stress ratings were collected before/after stress induction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with r-BSh showed higher sAA levels (after stress induction), but comparable sCort and subjective stress levels to the control group. The devaluation reduced, albeit not abolished, shopping-specific instrumental behaviors in both groups, particularly in neutral trials. There were no interaction effects of stress condition, group and devaluation on shopping-specific response choice in the preregistered analysis. sCort response significantly predicted PIT-dev as indicator for habitual behavior. Exploratory analyses showed that interactions of BSD symptom severity with subjective and sCort stress response predicted PIT-dev.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The findings are mixed. They show some evidence for a stress-related shift to habitual shopping-specific behaviors in persons with higher symptom severity yet they do not match findings of other planned analyses. Further research is needed to clarify the role of stress in PIT effects and potentially habitual behaviors, which may have implications for prevention/early intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":15049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","volume":" ","pages":"1326-1342"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486293/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risky online buying-shopping behavior: The role of stress responsivity on the transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits.\",\"authors\":\"Tobias A Thomas, Anna M Schmid, Nicolas K Erdal, Stefan Blümel, Silke M Müller, Christian J Merz, Oliver T Wolf, Matthias Brand, Sabine Steins-Loeber, Astrid Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.1556/2006.2025.00062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>There is a lack of research on the stress-related transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits in (early stages of) online buying-shopping disorder (BSD). This study investigated the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effect after reward devaluation (PIT-dev) as indicator of habitual behavior and its modulation by acute stress in individuals with risky (online) buying-shopping (r-BSh).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Individuals with r-BSh (n = 67) and a control group (n = 67) underwent a PIT paradigm with devaluation procedure. A stress induction/control procedure was administered after the first part of the paradigm. Four salivary samples (alpha-amylase, sAA; cortisol, sCort) and subjective stress ratings were collected before/after stress induction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with r-BSh showed higher sAA levels (after stress induction), but comparable sCort and subjective stress levels to the control group. The devaluation reduced, albeit not abolished, shopping-specific instrumental behaviors in both groups, particularly in neutral trials. There were no interaction effects of stress condition, group and devaluation on shopping-specific response choice in the preregistered analysis. sCort response significantly predicted PIT-dev as indicator for habitual behavior. Exploratory analyses showed that interactions of BSD symptom severity with subjective and sCort stress response predicted PIT-dev.</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>The findings are mixed. They show some evidence for a stress-related shift to habitual shopping-specific behaviors in persons with higher symptom severity yet they do not match findings of other planned analyses. Further research is needed to clarify the role of stress in PIT effects and potentially habitual behaviors, which may have implications for prevention/early intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral Addictions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1326-1342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12486293/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral Addictions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00062\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/9/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Print\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral Addictions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.2025.00062","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:网络购物障碍(BSD)早期阶段目标导向行为向刺激反应习惯的压力相关转化研究尚缺乏。本研究探讨了高风险(在线)购物(r-BSh)个体奖赏贬值(PIT-dev)后习惯性行为的巴甫洛夫-工具转移(PIT)效应及其在急性应激下的调节作用。方法:r-BSh患者(n = 67)和对照组(n = 67)采用带贬值程序的PIT范式。在范式的第一部分之后进行应力诱导/控制程序。在应激诱导前后采集4种唾液样本(α -淀粉酶、sAA、皮质醇、scot)和主观应激评分。结果:r-BSh个体表现出更高的sAA水平(应激诱导后),但sCort和主观应激水平与对照组相当。货币贬值虽然没有完全消除,但在两组中都减少了特定于购物的工具行为,尤其是在中性试验中。在预登记分析中,应激条件、群体和贬值对购物特异性反应选择没有交互作用。得分反应作为习惯行为的指标显著预测PIT-dev。探索性分析表明,BSD症状严重程度与主观应激反应和scot应激反应的相互作用预测了pit的发展。讨论与结论:研究结果好坏参半。他们展示了一些证据,表明在症状严重程度较高的人群中,与压力相关的习惯性购物行为转变,但他们与其他计划分析的结果不符。需要进一步的研究来阐明压力在PIT效应和潜在的习惯行为中的作用,这可能对预防/早期干预有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Risky online buying-shopping behavior: The role of stress responsivity on the transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits.

Risky online buying-shopping behavior: The role of stress responsivity on the transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits.

Risky online buying-shopping behavior: The role of stress responsivity on the transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits.

Risky online buying-shopping behavior: The role of stress responsivity on the transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits.

Background and aim: There is a lack of research on the stress-related transfer from goal-directed behavior to stimulus-response habits in (early stages of) online buying-shopping disorder (BSD). This study investigated the Pavlovian-to-instrumental transfer (PIT) effect after reward devaluation (PIT-dev) as indicator of habitual behavior and its modulation by acute stress in individuals with risky (online) buying-shopping (r-BSh).

Methods: Individuals with r-BSh (n = 67) and a control group (n = 67) underwent a PIT paradigm with devaluation procedure. A stress induction/control procedure was administered after the first part of the paradigm. Four salivary samples (alpha-amylase, sAA; cortisol, sCort) and subjective stress ratings were collected before/after stress induction.

Results: Individuals with r-BSh showed higher sAA levels (after stress induction), but comparable sCort and subjective stress levels to the control group. The devaluation reduced, albeit not abolished, shopping-specific instrumental behaviors in both groups, particularly in neutral trials. There were no interaction effects of stress condition, group and devaluation on shopping-specific response choice in the preregistered analysis. sCort response significantly predicted PIT-dev as indicator for habitual behavior. Exploratory analyses showed that interactions of BSD symptom severity with subjective and sCort stress response predicted PIT-dev.

Discussion and conclusions: The findings are mixed. They show some evidence for a stress-related shift to habitual shopping-specific behaviors in persons with higher symptom severity yet they do not match findings of other planned analyses. Further research is needed to clarify the role of stress in PIT effects and potentially habitual behaviors, which may have implications for prevention/early intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
91
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Journal of Behavioral Addictions is to create a forum for the scientific information exchange with regard to behavioral addictions. The journal is a broad focused interdisciplinary one that publishes manuscripts on different approaches of non-substance addictions, research reports focusing on the addictive patterns of various behaviors, especially disorders of the impulsive-compulsive spectrum, and also publishes reviews in these topics. Coverage ranges from genetic and neurobiological research through psychological and clinical psychiatric approaches to epidemiological, sociological and anthropological aspects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信