利用生理模型预测青光眼的结构-功能关系。

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Chris Bradley, Jithin Yohannan
{"title":"利用生理模型预测青光眼的结构-功能关系。","authors":"Chris Bradley, Jithin Yohannan","doi":"10.1167/iovs.66.11.75","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine how well a physiological model-the retina-V1 (RV1) model of target detection-predicts the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model includes a map of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) receptive fields across the visual field (VF), enabling simulation of different patterns of RGC loss. Predicted mean sensitivity for different patterns of simulated RGC loss and predictions of different curve-fitting models were compared to 12,917 paired SITA-Standard 24-2 VFs and optical coherence tomography measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from 4432 eyes of 2418 patients with glaucoma between 1997 and 2023. Except for one free parameter, all RV1 model parameters were fixed from a previous study that fit the model to an unrelated data set of contrast sensitivities for 43 localized achromatic stimuli.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different structure-function relationships were predicted by the RV1 model for different patterns of RGC loss. Random RGC loss resulted in a mean absolute error of 2.99 dB, which was marginally but significantly smaller than 3.01 dB for ninth-degree polynomial regression-the highest degree polynomial whose coefficients could be estimated. Other patterns of simulated RGC loss, including periphery-to-fovea loss typical in glaucoma, accounted for much of the observed variance in the structure-function data. Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model correctly predicted higher variance at lower dB/micron levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A physiological model can account for much of the observed variance in structure-function data for glaucoma by simulating different patterns of RGC loss-this is currently not possible with curve-fitting models.</p>","PeriodicalId":14620,"journal":{"name":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","volume":"66 11","pages":"75"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400969/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.\",\"authors\":\"Chris Bradley, Jithin Yohannan\",\"doi\":\"10.1167/iovs.66.11.75\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Determine how well a physiological model-the retina-V1 (RV1) model of target detection-predicts the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model includes a map of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) receptive fields across the visual field (VF), enabling simulation of different patterns of RGC loss. Predicted mean sensitivity for different patterns of simulated RGC loss and predictions of different curve-fitting models were compared to 12,917 paired SITA-Standard 24-2 VFs and optical coherence tomography measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from 4432 eyes of 2418 patients with glaucoma between 1997 and 2023. Except for one free parameter, all RV1 model parameters were fixed from a previous study that fit the model to an unrelated data set of contrast sensitivities for 43 localized achromatic stimuli.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Different structure-function relationships were predicted by the RV1 model for different patterns of RGC loss. Random RGC loss resulted in a mean absolute error of 2.99 dB, which was marginally but significantly smaller than 3.01 dB for ninth-degree polynomial regression-the highest degree polynomial whose coefficients could be estimated. Other patterns of simulated RGC loss, including periphery-to-fovea loss typical in glaucoma, accounted for much of the observed variance in the structure-function data. Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model correctly predicted higher variance at lower dB/micron levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A physiological model can account for much of the observed variance in structure-function data for glaucoma by simulating different patterns of RGC loss-this is currently not possible with curve-fitting models.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"volume\":\"66 11\",\"pages\":\"75\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12400969/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.11.75\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative ophthalmology & visual science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.66.11.75","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:确定视网膜- v1 (RV1)靶标检测生理模型对青光眼结构-功能关系的预测效果。方法:与曲线拟合模型不同,RV1模型包括一个横跨视野(VF)的视网膜神经节细胞(RGC)接受野图,可以模拟不同的RGC损失模式。对1997年至2023年间2418名青光眼患者4432只眼的12917对SITA-Standard 24-2 VFs和光学相干断层扫描测量的平均视网膜神经纤维层厚度进行比较,并对不同模拟RGC损失模式的预测平均灵敏度和不同曲线拟合模型的预测进行比较。除了一个自由参数外,所有的RV1模型参数都是从先前的研究中固定的,该研究将模型拟合到43个局部消色差刺激的对比敏感度的不相关数据集。结果:RV1模型预测了不同类型RGC丢失的结构-功能关系。RGC随机损失的平均绝对误差为2.99 dB,略小于可估计系数的最高次多项式(9次多项式)的3.01 dB。其他模拟的RGC丢失模式,包括青光眼典型的外周到中央凹的丢失,是结构-功能数据中观察到的差异的主要原因。与曲线拟合模型不同,RV1模型正确地预测了较低分贝/微米水平下的较高方差。结论:生理模型可以通过模拟不同的RGC损失模式来解释青光眼结构-功能数据的大部分差异,这是目前曲线拟合模型无法实现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.

Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.

Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.

Predicting the Structure-Function Relationship in Glaucoma Using a Physiological Model.

Purpose: Determine how well a physiological model-the retina-V1 (RV1) model of target detection-predicts the structure-function relationship in glaucoma.

Methods: Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model includes a map of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) receptive fields across the visual field (VF), enabling simulation of different patterns of RGC loss. Predicted mean sensitivity for different patterns of simulated RGC loss and predictions of different curve-fitting models were compared to 12,917 paired SITA-Standard 24-2 VFs and optical coherence tomography measurements of average retinal nerve fiber layer thickness from 4432 eyes of 2418 patients with glaucoma between 1997 and 2023. Except for one free parameter, all RV1 model parameters were fixed from a previous study that fit the model to an unrelated data set of contrast sensitivities for 43 localized achromatic stimuli.

Results: Different structure-function relationships were predicted by the RV1 model for different patterns of RGC loss. Random RGC loss resulted in a mean absolute error of 2.99 dB, which was marginally but significantly smaller than 3.01 dB for ninth-degree polynomial regression-the highest degree polynomial whose coefficients could be estimated. Other patterns of simulated RGC loss, including periphery-to-fovea loss typical in glaucoma, accounted for much of the observed variance in the structure-function data. Unlike curve-fitting models, the RV1 model correctly predicted higher variance at lower dB/micron levels.

Conclusions: A physiological model can account for much of the observed variance in structure-function data for glaucoma by simulating different patterns of RGC loss-this is currently not possible with curve-fitting models.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
339
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science (IOVS), published as ready online, is a peer-reviewed academic journal of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). IOVS features original research, mostly pertaining to clinical and laboratory ophthalmology and vision research in general.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信