药物性肺水肿:使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界药物警戒研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 BIOLOGY
Zilan Zhong, Manting Liu, Qian Zhong, Miao Zhou, Xingwei Di
{"title":"药物性肺水肿:使用FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的真实世界药物警戒研究","authors":"Zilan Zhong, Manting Liu, Qian Zhong, Miao Zhou, Xingwei Di","doi":"10.1590/1414-431X2025e14566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk of drug-induced pulmonary edema (DIPE) using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. This retrospective pharmacovigilance study utilized FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. We identified drugs with at least 10 reported DIPE cases as primary suspects (PS). The DIPE signals were assessed using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Multivariate logistic regression was employed to control for confounding factors, and the timing of DIPE onset was statistically analyzed. Out of 173 target drugs, 37 were identified with DIPE risk. The top five drugs were naloxone, dasatinib, nifedipine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and pioglitazone. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that all except pioglitazone were independent risk factors for DIPE. The onset time of DIPE varied by age and gender for some drugs. This study is the first to identify the DIPE risk systematically associated with multiple drugs. It highlights the need for clinicians and pharmacists to be aware of these high-risk drugs and to monitor high-risk populations closely to ensure medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9088,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","volume":"58 ","pages":"e14566"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377703/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).\",\"authors\":\"Zilan Zhong, Manting Liu, Qian Zhong, Miao Zhou, Xingwei Di\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/1414-431X2025e14566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk of drug-induced pulmonary edema (DIPE) using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. This retrospective pharmacovigilance study utilized FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. We identified drugs with at least 10 reported DIPE cases as primary suspects (PS). The DIPE signals were assessed using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Multivariate logistic regression was employed to control for confounding factors, and the timing of DIPE onset was statistically analyzed. Out of 173 target drugs, 37 were identified with DIPE risk. The top five drugs were naloxone, dasatinib, nifedipine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and pioglitazone. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that all except pioglitazone were independent risk factors for DIPE. The onset time of DIPE varied by age and gender for some drugs. This study is the first to identify the DIPE risk systematically associated with multiple drugs. It highlights the need for clinicians and pharmacists to be aware of these high-risk drugs and to monitor high-risk populations closely to ensure medication safety.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"e14566\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12377703/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2025e14566\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1414-431X2025e14566","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在利用美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)不良事件报告系统(FAERS)数据库系统评估药物性肺水肿(DIPE)的风险。这项回顾性药物警戒研究利用了2004年第一季度至2024年第二季度的FAERS数据。我们确定了至少10例DIPE报告病例的药物作为主要嫌疑人(PS)。采用报告优势比(ROR)、比例报告比(PRR)、贝叶斯置信传播神经网络(BCPNN)和经验贝叶斯几何平均(EBGM)四种方法对DIPE信号进行评估。采用多因素logistic回归控制混杂因素,对DIPE发病时间进行统计学分析。173种靶药中有37种具有DIPE风险。排在前5位的药物分别是纳洛酮、达沙替尼、硝苯地平、抗胸腺细胞球蛋白和吡格列酮。多因素logistic回归分析表明,除吡格列酮外,其他因素均为DIPE的独立危险因素。对于某些药物,DIPE的发病时间因年龄和性别而异。这项研究首次系统地确定了与多种药物相关的DIPE风险。它强调了临床医生和药剂师需要了解这些高风险药物,并密切监测高风险人群,以确保用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

Drug-induced pulmonary edema: a real-world pharmacovigilance study using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS).

This study aimed to systematically evaluate the risk of drug-induced pulmonary edema (DIPE) using the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. This retrospective pharmacovigilance study utilized FAERS data from the first quarter of 2004 to the second quarter of 2024. We identified drugs with at least 10 reported DIPE cases as primary suspects (PS). The DIPE signals were assessed using four methods: Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR), Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN), and Empirical Bayes Geometric Mean (EBGM). Multivariate logistic regression was employed to control for confounding factors, and the timing of DIPE onset was statistically analyzed. Out of 173 target drugs, 37 were identified with DIPE risk. The top five drugs were naloxone, dasatinib, nifedipine, anti-thymocyte globulin, and pioglitazone. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that all except pioglitazone were independent risk factors for DIPE. The onset time of DIPE varied by age and gender for some drugs. This study is the first to identify the DIPE risk systematically associated with multiple drugs. It highlights the need for clinicians and pharmacists to be aware of these high-risk drugs and to monitor high-risk populations closely to ensure medication safety.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, founded by Michel Jamra, is edited and published monthly by the Associação Brasileira de Divulgação Científica (ABDC), a federation of Brazilian scientific societies: - Sociedade Brasileira de Biofísica (SBBf) - Sociedade Brasileira de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Experimental (SBFTE) - Sociedade Brasileira de Fisiologia (SBFis) - Sociedade Brasileira de Imunologia (SBI) - Sociedade Brasileira de Investigação Clínica (SBIC) - Sociedade Brasileira de Neurociências e Comportamento (SBNeC).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信