澳大利亚非殖民化的高等心理学课程:给予原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民声音特权。

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Australian Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2025-08-25 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1080/00049530.2025.2544928
Chontel Gibson, Joanna Alexi, Pat Dudgeon, Cammi Murrup-Stewart, Stacey McMullen, Darcey Decke, Jeneva Ohan, Amanda Taylor, Peter Gill, Monica Thielking, Belle Selkirk
{"title":"澳大利亚非殖民化的高等心理学课程:给予原住民和托雷斯海峡岛民声音特权。","authors":"Chontel Gibson, Joanna Alexi, Pat Dudgeon, Cammi Murrup-Stewart, Stacey McMullen, Darcey Decke, Jeneva Ohan, Amanda Taylor, Peter Gill, Monica Thielking, Belle Selkirk","doi":"10.1080/00049530.2025.2544928","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Australian Indigenous Psychology Education Program has paved the way for Indigenising and decolonising psychology programs. While Indigenisation and decolonisation of psychology programs are not yet consistent, exemplar initiatives have emerged within recent times. This paper showcases these exemplars, providing details about the \"how to\" privilege Indigenous knowledges and decolonising practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative research paradigm was used to highlight multiple descriptive case studies. An Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach honoured Indigenous leadership and governance throughout the process, which supported the use of yarning as the data collection method. The methodological approach illustrated the importance of the psychology discipline supporting epistemological justice via the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five case studies provided practical strategies and actions that other psychology education providers, and indeed other higher education providers, can use to decolonise discipline programs. Examples of enablers included Indigenous leadership in curricula design and student support within the psychology discipline challenges. Examples of challenges included a lack of resources and epistemological racism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work reaffirms the call for urgent prioritisation to support, embed, and expand Indigenous knowledges and decolonising praxis within psychology and indeed, across broader health disciplines, in Australia and around the world.</p>","PeriodicalId":8871,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Psychology","volume":"77 1","pages":"2544928"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379689/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decolonising tertiary psychology programs in Australia: privileging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' voices.\",\"authors\":\"Chontel Gibson, Joanna Alexi, Pat Dudgeon, Cammi Murrup-Stewart, Stacey McMullen, Darcey Decke, Jeneva Ohan, Amanda Taylor, Peter Gill, Monica Thielking, Belle Selkirk\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00049530.2025.2544928\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The Australian Indigenous Psychology Education Program has paved the way for Indigenising and decolonising psychology programs. While Indigenisation and decolonisation of psychology programs are not yet consistent, exemplar initiatives have emerged within recent times. This paper showcases these exemplars, providing details about the \\\"how to\\\" privilege Indigenous knowledges and decolonising practices.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A qualitative research paradigm was used to highlight multiple descriptive case studies. An Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach honoured Indigenous leadership and governance throughout the process, which supported the use of yarning as the data collection method. The methodological approach illustrated the importance of the psychology discipline supporting epistemological justice via the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The five case studies provided practical strategies and actions that other psychology education providers, and indeed other higher education providers, can use to decolonise discipline programs. Examples of enablers included Indigenous leadership in curricula design and student support within the psychology discipline challenges. Examples of challenges included a lack of resources and epistemological racism.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This work reaffirms the call for urgent prioritisation to support, embed, and expand Indigenous knowledges and decolonising praxis within psychology and indeed, across broader health disciplines, in Australia and around the world.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"volume\":\"77 1\",\"pages\":\"2544928\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379689/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2544928\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00049530.2025.2544928","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标:澳大利亚土著心理学教育项目为心理学项目的本土化和去殖民化铺平了道路。虽然心理学项目的本土化和去殖民化还不一致,但近年来出现了一些典型的举措。本文展示了这些范例,提供了“如何”赋予土著知识和非殖民化实践特权的细节。方法:采用定性研究范式,突出多个描述性案例研究。土著参与性行动研究方法在整个过程中尊重土著的领导和治理,支持使用编织作为数据收集方法。方法方法说明了心理学学科通过纳入本土研究方法来支持认识论正义的重要性。结果:这五个案例研究为其他心理学教育提供者和其他高等教育提供者提供了实用的策略和行动,可以用来去殖民化学科项目。促成因素的例子包括课程设计中的土著领导和心理学学科挑战中的学生支持。挑战的例子包括缺乏资源和认识论上的种族主义。结论:这项工作再次呼吁紧急优先支持、嵌入和扩大澳大利亚和世界各地心理学领域以及更广泛的卫生学科领域的土著知识和非殖民化实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Decolonising tertiary psychology programs in Australia: privileging Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples' voices.

Objective: The Australian Indigenous Psychology Education Program has paved the way for Indigenising and decolonising psychology programs. While Indigenisation and decolonisation of psychology programs are not yet consistent, exemplar initiatives have emerged within recent times. This paper showcases these exemplars, providing details about the "how to" privilege Indigenous knowledges and decolonising practices.

Method: A qualitative research paradigm was used to highlight multiple descriptive case studies. An Aboriginal Participatory Action Research approach honoured Indigenous leadership and governance throughout the process, which supported the use of yarning as the data collection method. The methodological approach illustrated the importance of the psychology discipline supporting epistemological justice via the inclusion of Indigenous research methodologies.

Results: The five case studies provided practical strategies and actions that other psychology education providers, and indeed other higher education providers, can use to decolonise discipline programs. Examples of enablers included Indigenous leadership in curricula design and student support within the psychology discipline challenges. Examples of challenges included a lack of resources and epistemological racism.

Conclusions: This work reaffirms the call for urgent prioritisation to support, embed, and expand Indigenous knowledges and decolonising praxis within psychology and indeed, across broader health disciplines, in Australia and around the world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Psychology
Australian Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Psychology is the premier scientific journal of the Australian Psychological Society. It covers the entire spectrum of psychological research and receives articles on all topics within the broad scope of the discipline. The journal publishes high quality peer-reviewed articles with reviewers and associate editors providing detailed assistance to authors to reach publication. The journal publishes reports of experimental and survey studies, including reports of qualitative investigations, on pure and applied topics in the field of psychology. Articles on clinical psychology or on the professional concerns of applied psychology should be submitted to our sister journals, Australian Psychologist or Clinical Psychologist. The journal publishes occasional reviews of specific topics, theoretical pieces and commentaries on methodological issues. There are also solicited book reviews and comments Annual special issues devoted to a single topic, and guest edited by a specialist editor, are published. The journal regards itself as international in vision and will accept submissions from psychologists in all countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信