Mateus A Silva, Paula R Cortat, Carlos E C Consentini, Sâmara C C Pinto, Eneiva C C Celeghini, José O Carvalho, Leonardo F Melo, Milo Wiltbank, Roberto Sartori
{"title":"通过精子与输卵管细胞聚集体结合的能力预测奶牛人工授精时的父系生育能力。","authors":"Mateus A Silva, Paula R Cortat, Carlos E C Consentini, Sâmara C C Pinto, Eneiva C C Celeghini, José O Carvalho, Leonardo F Melo, Milo Wiltbank, Roberto Sartori","doi":"10.3168/jds.2025-27057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate sperm morphofunctional characteristics and the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct epithelial cell (OEC) aggregates as predictors of male field fertility. Based on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) data of 1,833 services in Holstein cows from a commercial dairy herd, sires were classified as of higher (HF, P/AI = 35.0% [362/1,034], n = 3) or lower (LF, P/AI = 21.4% [171/799], n = 4) fertility. Semen quality was assessed based on sperm motility (by computer-assisted sperm analysis, plasma and acrosome membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation, and membrane fluidity [by flow cytometry], and OEC binding). For the analysis of OEC binding, the oviduct isthmus region from abattoir tracts was dissected, and cells were incubated for 24 h to allow OEC aggregate formation, followed by co-incubation with 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> motile sperm. Bound sperm were counted at 4 time points: 0.5, 12, 24, and 36 h. Statistical analyses were conducted using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Sperm motility characteristics were not different between HF and LF sires, except for greater straight-line velocity in HF (HF: 94.7 ± 3.1 μm/s vs. LF: 80.9 ± 3.1 μm/s). Flow cytometry analysis was not able to explain the difference between fertility groups (P/AI). However, in the sperm binding test to OEC, the HF sires tended to have more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires at 0.5 h of co-incubation (59.1 vs. 54.0). At h 12 (36.5 vs. 28.6), 24 (24.0 vs. 15.3), and 36 (26.0 vs. 12.1), HF sires had more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires. Field fertility was positively correlated (r = 0.89) with the number of sperm bound per millimeter of OEC at 36 h of co-incubation. These results suggest that LF sires may have impaired fertility due to a reduced ability to bind to oviduct cells in vivo. In addition, the result showed the potential of sperm binding test to OEC for early evaluation or prediction of bulls' fertility, although more studies are being performed to refine the procedures during these assays, as well as to better understand other potential physiological mechanisms differing between HF and LF sires.</p>","PeriodicalId":354,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Dairy Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting sire fertility in artificial insemination of dairy cows by the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct cell aggregates.\",\"authors\":\"Mateus A Silva, Paula R Cortat, Carlos E C Consentini, Sâmara C C Pinto, Eneiva C C Celeghini, José O Carvalho, Leonardo F Melo, Milo Wiltbank, Roberto Sartori\",\"doi\":\"10.3168/jds.2025-27057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to evaluate sperm morphofunctional characteristics and the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct epithelial cell (OEC) aggregates as predictors of male field fertility. Based on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) data of 1,833 services in Holstein cows from a commercial dairy herd, sires were classified as of higher (HF, P/AI = 35.0% [362/1,034], n = 3) or lower (LF, P/AI = 21.4% [171/799], n = 4) fertility. Semen quality was assessed based on sperm motility (by computer-assisted sperm analysis, plasma and acrosome membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation, and membrane fluidity [by flow cytometry], and OEC binding). For the analysis of OEC binding, the oviduct isthmus region from abattoir tracts was dissected, and cells were incubated for 24 h to allow OEC aggregate formation, followed by co-incubation with 1 × 10<sup>5</sup> motile sperm. Bound sperm were counted at 4 time points: 0.5, 12, 24, and 36 h. Statistical analyses were conducted using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Sperm motility characteristics were not different between HF and LF sires, except for greater straight-line velocity in HF (HF: 94.7 ± 3.1 μm/s vs. LF: 80.9 ± 3.1 μm/s). Flow cytometry analysis was not able to explain the difference between fertility groups (P/AI). However, in the sperm binding test to OEC, the HF sires tended to have more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires at 0.5 h of co-incubation (59.1 vs. 54.0). At h 12 (36.5 vs. 28.6), 24 (24.0 vs. 15.3), and 36 (26.0 vs. 12.1), HF sires had more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires. Field fertility was positively correlated (r = 0.89) with the number of sperm bound per millimeter of OEC at 36 h of co-incubation. These results suggest that LF sires may have impaired fertility due to a reduced ability to bind to oviduct cells in vivo. In addition, the result showed the potential of sperm binding test to OEC for early evaluation or prediction of bulls' fertility, although more studies are being performed to refine the procedures during these assays, as well as to better understand other potential physiological mechanisms differing between HF and LF sires.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":354,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Dairy Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27057\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Dairy Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2025-27057","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究旨在评估精子形态功能特征和精子与输卵管上皮细胞(OEC)聚集体结合的能力,作为男性野外生育能力的预测指标。根据某商业奶牛场1833头荷斯坦奶牛的人工授精妊娠率(P/AI)数据,将奶牛分为高(HF, P/AI = 35.0% [362/ 1034], n = 3)和低(LF, P/AI = 21.4% [171/799], n = 4)两组。精液质量的评估基于精子活力(通过计算机辅助精子分析、血浆和顶体膜完整性、线粒体膜电位、膜脂过氧化和膜流动性[通过流式细胞术]以及OEC结合)。为了分析OEC的结合,我们解剖了屠宰场的输卵管峡区,将细胞孵育24 h,使OEC聚集形成,然后与1 × 105个活动精子共孵育。在4个时间点:0.5、12、24和36小时对结合精子进行计数。使用SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.)的GLIMMIX程序进行统计分析。精子运动特征在高频组和低频组之间没有差异,除了高频组的直线速度更高(高频组为94.7±3.1 μm/s,低频组为80.9±3.1 μm/s)。流式细胞术分析无法解释生育组之间的差异(P/AI)。然而,在精子与OEC的结合试验中,在共孵育0.5 h时,HF组比LF组每毫米OEC有更多的结合精子(59.1比54.0)。在h 12 (36.5 vs. 28.6)、h 24 (24.0 vs. 15.3)和h 36 (26.0 vs. 12.1)时,HF男性比LF男性每毫米OEC有更多的结合精子。在共孵育36 h时,田间生育力与每毫米OEC结合的精子数量呈正相关(r = 0.89)。这些结果表明,由于体内与输卵管细胞结合的能力降低,LF sires可能会损害生育能力。此外,该结果显示精子结合试验对OEC的早期评估或预测公牛生育能力的潜力,尽管还需要进行更多的研究来完善这些检测过程,以及更好地了解HF和LF之间不同的其他潜在生理机制。
Predicting sire fertility in artificial insemination of dairy cows by the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct cell aggregates.
This study aimed to evaluate sperm morphofunctional characteristics and the ability of spermatozoa to bind to oviduct epithelial cell (OEC) aggregates as predictors of male field fertility. Based on pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) data of 1,833 services in Holstein cows from a commercial dairy herd, sires were classified as of higher (HF, P/AI = 35.0% [362/1,034], n = 3) or lower (LF, P/AI = 21.4% [171/799], n = 4) fertility. Semen quality was assessed based on sperm motility (by computer-assisted sperm analysis, plasma and acrosome membrane integrity, mitochondrial membrane potential, membrane lipid peroxidation, and membrane fluidity [by flow cytometry], and OEC binding). For the analysis of OEC binding, the oviduct isthmus region from abattoir tracts was dissected, and cells were incubated for 24 h to allow OEC aggregate formation, followed by co-incubation with 1 × 105 motile sperm. Bound sperm were counted at 4 time points: 0.5, 12, 24, and 36 h. Statistical analyses were conducted using the GLIMMIX procedure in SAS 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc.). Sperm motility characteristics were not different between HF and LF sires, except for greater straight-line velocity in HF (HF: 94.7 ± 3.1 μm/s vs. LF: 80.9 ± 3.1 μm/s). Flow cytometry analysis was not able to explain the difference between fertility groups (P/AI). However, in the sperm binding test to OEC, the HF sires tended to have more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires at 0.5 h of co-incubation (59.1 vs. 54.0). At h 12 (36.5 vs. 28.6), 24 (24.0 vs. 15.3), and 36 (26.0 vs. 12.1), HF sires had more bound sperm per millimeter of OEC than LF sires. Field fertility was positively correlated (r = 0.89) with the number of sperm bound per millimeter of OEC at 36 h of co-incubation. These results suggest that LF sires may have impaired fertility due to a reduced ability to bind to oviduct cells in vivo. In addition, the result showed the potential of sperm binding test to OEC for early evaluation or prediction of bulls' fertility, although more studies are being performed to refine the procedures during these assays, as well as to better understand other potential physiological mechanisms differing between HF and LF sires.
期刊介绍:
The official journal of the American Dairy Science Association®, Journal of Dairy Science® (JDS) is the leading peer-reviewed general dairy research journal in the world. JDS readers represent education, industry, and government agencies in more than 70 countries with interests in biochemistry, breeding, economics, engineering, environment, food science, genetics, microbiology, nutrition, pathology, physiology, processing, public health, quality assurance, and sanitation.