以正念为基础的夫妻干预:在什么条件下对谁有益?

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES
Family Process Pub Date : 2025-09-04 DOI:10.1111/famp.70067
Yunzhi Zheng
{"title":"以正念为基础的夫妻干预:在什么条件下对谁有益?","authors":"Yunzhi Zheng","doi":"10.1111/famp.70067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Mindfulness-based couple interventions have been generally recognized as effective in enhancing relationship outcomes. However, it remains unclear specifically <i>for whom</i> and <i>under what conditions</i> such programs benefit couple relationships, leaving important clinical implications overlooked. To answer these questions, the current systematic research synthesis aimed to explore preliminary trends by (a) identifying potential patterns in how relationship benefits may differ based on sample characteristics, (b) comparing conditions of program delivery, and (c) reviewing methodological issues to provide insight for future research and interventions. A search of peer-reviewed quantitative studies published from January 2000 to April 2025 resulted in 444 studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 studies involving 2,508 couples plus 328 individuals were included. Overall, most mindfulness-based couple intervention programs included predominantly White, well-educated, different-sex couples and were conducted in multi-couple, in-person group settings. Although some patterns emerged, the limited number and heterogeneity of studies warrant cautious interpretation. Preliminary trends suggested that people of color and low-SES couples could benefit comparably, or in some cases, possibly even more from participating in mindfulness-based couple interventions, especially when programs are tailored to their contexts. Compared to patients with chronic health conditions, their enrolled partners tended to benefit less. Male partners of pregnant women seemed to benefit more. Regarding intervention conditions, the findings on the benefit of homework practices were mixed. Methodological themes (e.g., use of control groups, self-report measures, interdependence among couple members) were also summarized and followed with suggestions for future work (e.g., dismantling studies, observational, physiological, and multi-informant methods).</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51396,"journal":{"name":"Family Process","volume":"64 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mindfulness-Based Couple Interventions: For Whom and Under What Conditions Do They Have Relationship Benefits?\",\"authors\":\"Yunzhi Zheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/famp.70067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Mindfulness-based couple interventions have been generally recognized as effective in enhancing relationship outcomes. However, it remains unclear specifically <i>for whom</i> and <i>under what conditions</i> such programs benefit couple relationships, leaving important clinical implications overlooked. To answer these questions, the current systematic research synthesis aimed to explore preliminary trends by (a) identifying potential patterns in how relationship benefits may differ based on sample characteristics, (b) comparing conditions of program delivery, and (c) reviewing methodological issues to provide insight for future research and interventions. A search of peer-reviewed quantitative studies published from January 2000 to April 2025 resulted in 444 studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 studies involving 2,508 couples plus 328 individuals were included. Overall, most mindfulness-based couple intervention programs included predominantly White, well-educated, different-sex couples and were conducted in multi-couple, in-person group settings. Although some patterns emerged, the limited number and heterogeneity of studies warrant cautious interpretation. Preliminary trends suggested that people of color and low-SES couples could benefit comparably, or in some cases, possibly even more from participating in mindfulness-based couple interventions, especially when programs are tailored to their contexts. Compared to patients with chronic health conditions, their enrolled partners tended to benefit less. Male partners of pregnant women seemed to benefit more. Regarding intervention conditions, the findings on the benefit of homework practices were mixed. Methodological themes (e.g., use of control groups, self-report measures, interdependence among couple members) were also summarized and followed with suggestions for future work (e.g., dismantling studies, observational, physiological, and multi-informant methods).</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Family Process\",\"volume\":\"64 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Family Process\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70067\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Process","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/famp.70067","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

以正念为基础的夫妻干预通常被认为是提高关系结果的有效方法。然而,目前还不清楚具体对谁以及在什么条件下这些项目有利于夫妻关系,留下重要的临床意义被忽视。为了回答这些问题,目前的系统研究综合旨在通过以下方式探索初步趋势:(a)识别基于样本特征的关系收益可能存在的潜在模式,(b)比较项目交付条件,以及(c)回顾方法问题,为未来的研究和干预提供见解。对2000年1月至2025年4月发表的同行评议定量研究的搜索结果是444项研究。在应用纳入和排除标准后,纳入了21项研究,涉及2508对夫妇和328名个体。总的来说,大多数以正念为基础的夫妻干预项目主要包括受过良好教育的白人、不同性别的夫妇,并在多对夫妇面对面的团体环境中进行。虽然出现了一些模式,但有限的数量和异质性的研究需要谨慎的解释。初步的趋势表明,有色人种和低社会经济地位的夫妇可以从参与以正念为基础的夫妻干预中获得相当的好处,或者在某些情况下,甚至可能更多,特别是当项目是根据他们的情况量身定制的时候。与患有慢性疾病的患者相比,他们的登记伴侣往往受益较少。孕妇的男性伴侣似乎受益更多。在干预条件方面,关于作业练习的益处的调查结果好坏参半。还总结了方法学主题(例如,控制组的使用、自我报告措施、夫妻成员之间的相互依赖),并对未来的工作提出了建议(例如,拆解研究、观察、生理和多信息提供者方法)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mindfulness-Based Couple Interventions: For Whom and Under What Conditions Do They Have Relationship Benefits?

Mindfulness-based couple interventions have been generally recognized as effective in enhancing relationship outcomes. However, it remains unclear specifically for whom and under what conditions such programs benefit couple relationships, leaving important clinical implications overlooked. To answer these questions, the current systematic research synthesis aimed to explore preliminary trends by (a) identifying potential patterns in how relationship benefits may differ based on sample characteristics, (b) comparing conditions of program delivery, and (c) reviewing methodological issues to provide insight for future research and interventions. A search of peer-reviewed quantitative studies published from January 2000 to April 2025 resulted in 444 studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 21 studies involving 2,508 couples plus 328 individuals were included. Overall, most mindfulness-based couple intervention programs included predominantly White, well-educated, different-sex couples and were conducted in multi-couple, in-person group settings. Although some patterns emerged, the limited number and heterogeneity of studies warrant cautious interpretation. Preliminary trends suggested that people of color and low-SES couples could benefit comparably, or in some cases, possibly even more from participating in mindfulness-based couple interventions, especially when programs are tailored to their contexts. Compared to patients with chronic health conditions, their enrolled partners tended to benefit less. Male partners of pregnant women seemed to benefit more. Regarding intervention conditions, the findings on the benefit of homework practices were mixed. Methodological themes (e.g., use of control groups, self-report measures, interdependence among couple members) were also summarized and followed with suggestions for future work (e.g., dismantling studies, observational, physiological, and multi-informant methods).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Family Process
Family Process Multiple-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
5.10%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Family Process is an international, multidisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing original articles, including theory and practice, philosophical underpinnings, qualitative and quantitative clinical research, and training in couple and family therapy, family interaction, and family relationships with networks and larger systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信