2016年至2023年,英联邦和全球癌症公共和慈善研究资金、出版物和研究网络:比较分析

Anbang Du, Markus Brede, Stuart A McIntosh, Beining Zhang, Aminu O Alem, Gabriela Borin, Wilson Cheah, Ellen Copson, Ramsey I Cutress, Anna Folz, Emily T Helms, Zain Memon, Olabiyi H Olaniran, Constantinos Savva, Edward Thomas, Rifat Atun, Michael G Head
{"title":"2016年至2023年,英联邦和全球癌症公共和慈善研究资金、出版物和研究网络:比较分析","authors":"Anbang Du, Markus Brede, Stuart A McIntosh, Beining Zhang, Aminu O Alem, Gabriela Borin, Wilson Cheah, Ellen Copson, Ramsey I Cutress, Anna Folz, Emily T Helms, Zain Memon, Olabiyi H Olaniran, Constantinos Savva, Edward Thomas, Rifat Atun, Michael G Head","doi":"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00338-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Review presents a comprehensive analysis of the amounts and distribution of public and philanthropic global cancer research funding between 2016 and 2023, including patterns of international collaboration and downstream research output, with an emphasis on the Commonwealth. We show that annual investment decreased globally each year, apart from a rise in 2021. Network analysis revealed that grant and publication collaborations between the Commonwealth, the USA, and the EU are facilitated by linkages through a core group of Commonwealth countries, including the UK, Australia, and Canada. There are inequities in research investment and low funding for treatment modalities for many cancers. These inequities also manifest in the central positioning of high-income Commonwealth countries in research collaborations, but also point to opportunities for high-income Commonwealth countries to facilitate linkages with low-income countries and support active cancer research in the USA and the EU. There is an urgent need to review research investment priorities, both within the Commonwealth and globally, to align with population needs and promote collaborative strategies that can build research skills and infrastructure in low-income settings to impact global cancer control. Finite resources should be invested wisely to achieve maximum improvements in mortality and alleviate the cancer burden.","PeriodicalId":22865,"journal":{"name":"The Lancet Oncology","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public and philanthropic research funding, publications, and research networks for cancer in the Commonwealth and globally between 2016 and 2023: a comparative analysis\",\"authors\":\"Anbang Du, Markus Brede, Stuart A McIntosh, Beining Zhang, Aminu O Alem, Gabriela Borin, Wilson Cheah, Ellen Copson, Ramsey I Cutress, Anna Folz, Emily T Helms, Zain Memon, Olabiyi H Olaniran, Constantinos Savva, Edward Thomas, Rifat Atun, Michael G Head\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00338-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This Review presents a comprehensive analysis of the amounts and distribution of public and philanthropic global cancer research funding between 2016 and 2023, including patterns of international collaboration and downstream research output, with an emphasis on the Commonwealth. We show that annual investment decreased globally each year, apart from a rise in 2021. Network analysis revealed that grant and publication collaborations between the Commonwealth, the USA, and the EU are facilitated by linkages through a core group of Commonwealth countries, including the UK, Australia, and Canada. There are inequities in research investment and low funding for treatment modalities for many cancers. These inequities also manifest in the central positioning of high-income Commonwealth countries in research collaborations, but also point to opportunities for high-income Commonwealth countries to facilitate linkages with low-income countries and support active cancer research in the USA and the EU. There is an urgent need to review research investment priorities, both within the Commonwealth and globally, to align with population needs and promote collaborative strategies that can build research skills and infrastructure in low-income settings to impact global cancer control. Finite resources should be invested wisely to achieve maximum improvements in mortality and alleviate the cancer burden.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Lancet Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00338-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Lancet Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/s1470-2045(25)00338-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本综述全面分析了2016年至2023年间全球公共和慈善癌症研究资金的数量和分布,包括国际合作模式和下游研究产出,重点是英联邦。我们发现,除了2021年出现增长外,全球年度投资每年都在下降。网络分析显示,英联邦、美国和欧盟之间的资助和出版合作是通过包括英国、澳大利亚和加拿大在内的英联邦国家核心集团的联系来促进的。在研究投资方面存在不公平,许多癌症的治疗方式资金不足。这些不平等还体现在高收入英联邦国家在研究合作中的中心地位,但也指出高收入英联邦国家有机会促进与低收入国家的联系,并支持美国和欧盟积极的癌症研究。迫切需要审查英联邦内部和全球的研究投资重点,以便与人口需求保持一致,并促进能够在低收入环境中建立研究技能和基础设施的合作战略,以影响全球癌症控制。应该明智地投资有限的资源,以最大限度地降低死亡率和减轻癌症负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public and philanthropic research funding, publications, and research networks for cancer in the Commonwealth and globally between 2016 and 2023: a comparative analysis
This Review presents a comprehensive analysis of the amounts and distribution of public and philanthropic global cancer research funding between 2016 and 2023, including patterns of international collaboration and downstream research output, with an emphasis on the Commonwealth. We show that annual investment decreased globally each year, apart from a rise in 2021. Network analysis revealed that grant and publication collaborations between the Commonwealth, the USA, and the EU are facilitated by linkages through a core group of Commonwealth countries, including the UK, Australia, and Canada. There are inequities in research investment and low funding for treatment modalities for many cancers. These inequities also manifest in the central positioning of high-income Commonwealth countries in research collaborations, but also point to opportunities for high-income Commonwealth countries to facilitate linkages with low-income countries and support active cancer research in the USA and the EU. There is an urgent need to review research investment priorities, both within the Commonwealth and globally, to align with population needs and promote collaborative strategies that can build research skills and infrastructure in low-income settings to impact global cancer control. Finite resources should be invested wisely to achieve maximum improvements in mortality and alleviate the cancer burden.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信