针对青少年恃强凌弱和受害行为的干预措施:一项系统综述

IF 8.1 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Nocentini Annalaura, Taddei Benedetta, De Luca Lisa, Menesini Ersilia
{"title":"针对青少年恃强凌弱和受害行为的干预措施:一项系统综述","authors":"Nocentini Annalaura,&nbsp;Taddei Benedetta,&nbsp;De Luca Lisa,&nbsp;Menesini Ersilia","doi":"10.1007/s40894-024-00255-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reviews and meta-analyses were conducted on universal prevention on school bullying, but no systematic scientific attention has been paid to the indicated interventions targeting those students already involved in the bullying phenomenon as victims or as bullies. This review examined 43 studies providing a qualitative and systematic synthesis of what is realized in the school context as indicated actions, deepening the main characteristics of their implementation and their effectiveness. The analysis was conducted separately for interventions targeting those involved in perpetrating behaviors, those who are victimized, and for interventions including both sides. The results showed that most indicated actions are designed for victims and bullies/victims, and for adolescents. In terms of the interventions implemented, the review presented Evidence-Based Interventions specifically ideated for bullying or programs adapted from general mental health, traditional strategies reported in the literature to address bullying/victimization cases, and specific procedures defined as bullying-indicated interventions. Most interventions are delivered by school staff in the case of bullies/victims and bullies target, while for indicated victim interventions, they are generally led by the school psychologist or counsellor. Interventions for bullies included psycho-educational and emotional-focused actions, victims’ interventions mainly focused on counselling, clinical, and skills building. Protocols for both targets included relational and mediational approaches. 67% of the studies evaluated the effectiveness, and only in a minority of cases did the intervention result not significant in reducing the different types of outcomes. Research needs to integrate a valid evaluation of effectiveness to discuss the sustainability of these new and traditional interventions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45912,"journal":{"name":"Adolescent Research Review","volume":"10 3","pages":"403 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indicated Interventions for Youth Involved in Bullying and Victimization Behaviors: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"Nocentini Annalaura,&nbsp;Taddei Benedetta,&nbsp;De Luca Lisa,&nbsp;Menesini Ersilia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40894-024-00255-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Reviews and meta-analyses were conducted on universal prevention on school bullying, but no systematic scientific attention has been paid to the indicated interventions targeting those students already involved in the bullying phenomenon as victims or as bullies. This review examined 43 studies providing a qualitative and systematic synthesis of what is realized in the school context as indicated actions, deepening the main characteristics of their implementation and their effectiveness. The analysis was conducted separately for interventions targeting those involved in perpetrating behaviors, those who are victimized, and for interventions including both sides. The results showed that most indicated actions are designed for victims and bullies/victims, and for adolescents. In terms of the interventions implemented, the review presented Evidence-Based Interventions specifically ideated for bullying or programs adapted from general mental health, traditional strategies reported in the literature to address bullying/victimization cases, and specific procedures defined as bullying-indicated interventions. Most interventions are delivered by school staff in the case of bullies/victims and bullies target, while for indicated victim interventions, they are generally led by the school psychologist or counsellor. Interventions for bullies included psycho-educational and emotional-focused actions, victims’ interventions mainly focused on counselling, clinical, and skills building. Protocols for both targets included relational and mediational approaches. 67% of the studies evaluated the effectiveness, and only in a minority of cases did the intervention result not significant in reducing the different types of outcomes. Research needs to integrate a valid evaluation of effectiveness to discuss the sustainability of these new and traditional interventions.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"volume\":\"10 3\",\"pages\":\"403 - 432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Adolescent Research Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-024-00255-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Adolescent Research Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40894-024-00255-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对普遍预防校园欺凌进行了回顾和荟萃分析,但没有系统的科学关注针对已经参与欺凌现象的学生作为受害者或欺凌者的指示干预措施。本综述审查了43项研究,提供了在学校背景下作为指示行动实现的定性和系统综合,深化了其实施的主要特征及其有效性。分析分别针对那些参与犯罪行为的人、受害者和包括双方的干预进行。结果表明,大多数指示行为是为受害者和欺凌者/受害者以及青少年设计的。在实施的干预措施方面,本综述提出了专门针对欺凌的基于证据的干预措施,或从一般心理健康中改编的项目,文献中报道的解决欺凌/受害案例的传统策略,以及定义为欺凌指示干预措施的具体程序。在欺凌者/受害者和欺凌目标的情况下,大多数干预措施由学校工作人员提供,而对于指示的受害者干预措施,通常由学校心理学家或辅导员领导。对欺凌者的干预包括心理教育和以情感为重点的行动,受害者的干预主要集中在咨询、临床和技能建设上。这两个目标的协议包括关系和中介方法。67%的研究评估了干预的有效性,只有在少数情况下,干预结果在减少不同类型的结果方面没有显著性。研究需要整合有效的有效性评估,以讨论这些新的和传统的干预措施的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Indicated Interventions for Youth Involved in Bullying and Victimization Behaviors: A Systematic Review

Indicated Interventions for Youth Involved in Bullying and Victimization Behaviors: A Systematic Review

Indicated Interventions for Youth Involved in Bullying and Victimization Behaviors: A Systematic Review

Reviews and meta-analyses were conducted on universal prevention on school bullying, but no systematic scientific attention has been paid to the indicated interventions targeting those students already involved in the bullying phenomenon as victims or as bullies. This review examined 43 studies providing a qualitative and systematic synthesis of what is realized in the school context as indicated actions, deepening the main characteristics of their implementation and their effectiveness. The analysis was conducted separately for interventions targeting those involved in perpetrating behaviors, those who are victimized, and for interventions including both sides. The results showed that most indicated actions are designed for victims and bullies/victims, and for adolescents. In terms of the interventions implemented, the review presented Evidence-Based Interventions specifically ideated for bullying or programs adapted from general mental health, traditional strategies reported in the literature to address bullying/victimization cases, and specific procedures defined as bullying-indicated interventions. Most interventions are delivered by school staff in the case of bullies/victims and bullies target, while for indicated victim interventions, they are generally led by the school psychologist or counsellor. Interventions for bullies included psycho-educational and emotional-focused actions, victims’ interventions mainly focused on counselling, clinical, and skills building. Protocols for both targets included relational and mediational approaches. 67% of the studies evaluated the effectiveness, and only in a minority of cases did the intervention result not significant in reducing the different types of outcomes. Research needs to integrate a valid evaluation of effectiveness to discuss the sustainability of these new and traditional interventions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Adolescent Research Review
Adolescent Research Review PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Adolescent Research Review publishes articles that review important contributions to the understanding of adolescence.  The Review draws from the many subdisciplines of developmental science, psychological science, education, criminology, public health, medicine, social work, and other allied disciplines that address the subject of youth and adolescence. The editors are especially interested in articles that bridge gaps between disciplines or that focus on topics that transcend traditional disciplinary boundaries.  Reviews must be cutting edge and comprehensive in the way they advance science, practice or policy relating to adolescents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信