“给他们正确的工具：”妇产科项目主任对住院医师补救的看法

IF 2.1 3区医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES

Journal of Surgical Education Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103646

Huma Farid MD, Melissa Spiel DO, Daniela Febres-Cordero MD, Sara Neill MD, Brett C. Young MD

{"title":"“给他们正确的工具：”妇产科项目主任对住院医师补救的看法","authors":"Huma Farid MD, Melissa Spiel DO, Daniela Febres-Cordero MD, Sara Neill MD, Brett C. Young MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103646","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Resident remediation is a multifaceted process requiring tailored and individualized interventions. Our study aimed to better understand the remediation process, from initiation to conclusion, from the perspective of program directors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with obstetrics and gynecology program directors nationwide and identified themes around resident remediation using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>We interviewed participants virtually from a variety of geographic regions across the country at academic and community hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants were required to be current residency program directors or associate program directors in obstetrics-gynecology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten respondents were included. Key themes emerged in our interviews, including the role of the Clinical Competency Committee in evaluation and identification of residents in need of remediation, lack of standardized documentation practices, concerns regarding limited engagement of faculty and residents, and difficulties in remediating professionalism concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need for structured remediation protocols, increased faculty engagement, and standardized support systems to optimize residency remediation outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 10","pages":"Article 103646"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“Giving Them the Right Tools:” Obstetrics and Gynecology Program Directors’ Perspectives on Resident Remediation\",\"authors\":\"Huma Farid MD, Melissa Spiel DO, Daniela Febres-Cordero MD, Sara Neill MD, Brett C. Young MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103646\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Resident remediation is a multifaceted process requiring tailored and individualized interventions. Our study aimed to better understand the remediation process, from initiation to conclusion, from the perspective of program directors.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with obstetrics and gynecology program directors nationwide and identified themes around resident remediation using thematic analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>We interviewed participants virtually from a variety of geographic regions across the country at academic and community hospitals.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>Participants were required to be current residency program directors or associate program directors in obstetrics-gynecology.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ten respondents were included. Key themes emerged in our interviews, including the role of the Clinical Competency Committee in evaluation and identification of residents in need of remediation, lack of standardized documentation practices, concerns regarding limited engagement of faculty and residents, and difficulties in remediating professionalism concerns.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Our findings highlight the need for structured remediation protocols, increased faculty engagement, and standardized support systems to optimize residency remediation outcomes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103646\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002272\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002272","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

总统补救是一个多方面的过程，需要量身定制和个性化的干预措施。我们的研究旨在从项目主管的角度更好地理解从开始到结束的修复过程。我们对全国的妇产科项目主任进行了单独的、半结构化的访谈，并通过主题分析确定了居民修复的主题。我们采访了来自全国不同地理区域的学术和社区医院的参与者。参与者被要求是妇产科的现任住院医师项目主任或副项目主任。结果纳入10名调查对象。在我们的访谈中出现了关键主题，包括临床能力委员会在评估和识别需要纠正的住院医生中的作用，缺乏标准化的文件实践，对教师和住院医生有限参与的担忧，以及纠正专业问题的困难。结论：我们的研究结果强调需要结构化的补救方案，提高教师参与度和标准化的支持系统来优化住院医师补救结果。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

“Giving Them the Right Tools:” Obstetrics and Gynecology Program Directors’ Perspectives on Resident Remediation

Objective

Resident remediation is a multifaceted process requiring tailored and individualized interventions. Our study aimed to better understand the remediation process, from initiation to conclusion, from the perspective of program directors.

Design

We conducted individual, semi-structured interviews with obstetrics and gynecology program directors nationwide and identified themes around resident remediation using thematic analysis.

Setting

We interviewed participants virtually from a variety of geographic regions across the country at academic and community hospitals.

Participants

Participants were required to be current residency program directors or associate program directors in obstetrics-gynecology.

Results

Ten respondents were included. Key themes emerged in our interviews, including the role of the Clinical Competency Committee in evaluation and identification of residents in need of remediation, lack of standardized documentation practices, concerns regarding limited engagement of faculty and residents, and difficulties in remediating professionalism concerns.

Conclusions

Our findings highlight the need for structured remediation protocols, increased faculty engagement, and standardized support systems to optimize residency remediation outcomes.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY

CiteScore

5.60

自引率

10.30%

发文量

261

审稿时长

48 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.