用学前评估预测州测试能力

IF 2.9 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Patrick Ehrman, Robert J. Duncan, Sara A. Schmitt, David J. Purpura
{"title":"用学前评估预测州测试能力","authors":"Patrick Ehrman, Robert J. Duncan, Sara A. Schmitt, David J. Purpura","doi":"10.1177/00222194251364840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many children in the United States fail to meet proficiency benchmarks on mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) tests in elementary school despite those tests being related to future outcomes. Thus, strategies are needed to identify and support children at risk for failing to reach proficiency in mathematics and ELA that consider multiple school readiness domains. The current study tested predictive relations between preschool skills and proficiency status on third and fourth-grade state tests for mathematics and ELA using data from 431 children. Three backward selection ordinal logistic regressions were run for each outcome using nine assessments covering mathematics, language, literacy, and executive function (EF) skills. Models using (a) fall scores, (b) spring scores, and (c) the average and change scores across the preschool year consistently identified early mathematics ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.34 to 2.32) and EF ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.23 to 1.40) as strong predictors of proficiency in both mathematics and ELA. Children’s vocabulary skills ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.29 to 1.55), but not early literacy skills, were consistently strong predictors of proficiency in ELA. Implications for policy and practice to improve children’s early learning outcomes are discussed.","PeriodicalId":48189,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting State Testing Proficiency with Preschool Assessments\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Ehrman, Robert J. Duncan, Sara A. Schmitt, David J. Purpura\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00222194251364840\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many children in the United States fail to meet proficiency benchmarks on mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) tests in elementary school despite those tests being related to future outcomes. Thus, strategies are needed to identify and support children at risk for failing to reach proficiency in mathematics and ELA that consider multiple school readiness domains. The current study tested predictive relations between preschool skills and proficiency status on third and fourth-grade state tests for mathematics and ELA using data from 431 children. Three backward selection ordinal logistic regressions were run for each outcome using nine assessments covering mathematics, language, literacy, and executive function (EF) skills. Models using (a) fall scores, (b) spring scores, and (c) the average and change scores across the preschool year consistently identified early mathematics ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.34 to 2.32) and EF ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.23 to 1.40) as strong predictors of proficiency in both mathematics and ELA. Children’s vocabulary skills ( <jats:italic>ORs</jats:italic> from 1.29 to 1.55), but not early literacy skills, were consistently strong predictors of proficiency in ELA. Implications for policy and practice to improve children’s early learning outcomes are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48189,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"70 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Learning Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251364840\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Learning Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00222194251364840","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多美国儿童在小学时未能达到数学和英语语言艺术(ELA)测试的熟练程度基准,尽管这些测试与未来的成就有关。因此,需要制定策略来识别和支持有可能无法熟练掌握数学和ELA的儿童,并考虑多个入学准备领域。本研究利用431名儿童的数据,测试了学前技能与三年级和四年级数学和ELA状态测试的熟练程度之间的预测关系。使用涵盖数学、语言、读写和执行功能(EF)技能的九项评估,对每个结果进行三次反向选择有序逻辑回归。使用(a)秋季分数、(b)春季分数和(c)学龄前平均和变化分数的模型一致认为,早期数学(or从1.34到2.32)和EF (or从1.23到1.40)是数学和ELA熟练程度的有力预测因子。儿童的词汇技能(or从1.29到1.55),而不是早期读写技能,始终是ELA熟练程度的强预测因子。讨论了改善儿童早期学习成果的政策和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting State Testing Proficiency with Preschool Assessments
Many children in the United States fail to meet proficiency benchmarks on mathematics and English Language Arts (ELA) tests in elementary school despite those tests being related to future outcomes. Thus, strategies are needed to identify and support children at risk for failing to reach proficiency in mathematics and ELA that consider multiple school readiness domains. The current study tested predictive relations between preschool skills and proficiency status on third and fourth-grade state tests for mathematics and ELA using data from 431 children. Three backward selection ordinal logistic regressions were run for each outcome using nine assessments covering mathematics, language, literacy, and executive function (EF) skills. Models using (a) fall scores, (b) spring scores, and (c) the average and change scores across the preschool year consistently identified early mathematics ( ORs from 1.34 to 2.32) and EF ( ORs from 1.23 to 1.40) as strong predictors of proficiency in both mathematics and ELA. Children’s vocabulary skills ( ORs from 1.29 to 1.55), but not early literacy skills, were consistently strong predictors of proficiency in ELA. Implications for policy and practice to improve children’s early learning outcomes are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Learning Disabilities (JLD), a multidisciplinary, international publication, presents work and comments related to learning disabilities. Initial consideration of a manuscript depends upon (a) the relevance and usefulness of the content to the readership; (b) how the manuscript compares to other articles dealing with similar content on pertinent variables (e.g., sample size, research design, review of literature); (c) clarity of writing style; and (d) the author"s adherence to APA guidelines. Articles cover such fields as education, psychology, neurology, medicine, law, and counseling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信