{"title":"中学智障学生职业课程教师评价:来自沙特阿拉伯的探索性分析","authors":"Hussain A. Almalky , Shaykhah M. Alqahtani","doi":"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Students with intellectual disabilities (ID) continue to face significant challenges in transitioning from school to employment. Vocational education plays a critical role in developing workforce skills and promoting independent living. Despite its importance, the effectiveness of vocational education for students with ID in Saudi Arabia has received limited empirical investigation. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the vocational curriculum through Tyler’s Curriculum Evaluation Theory and the Universal Design for Transition framework, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study examined special education teachers’ perceptions of the vocational curriculum’s appropriateness for secondary students with ID in Saudi Arabia. It also explored whether these perceptions differed based on teachers’ qualifications, area of specialization, years of experience, or institutional setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A structured quantitative survey measured four curriculum domains: presentation style, content relevance, learning activities, and assessment methods. Data from 84 special education teachers in Riyadh were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, with effect sizes (Cohen’s d) reported. Reliability was confirmed via Cronbach’s alpha, and content validity was established through expert review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Teachers generally rated the curriculum favorably, particularly regarding presentation style. In contrast, the learning activities domain received lower ratings, indicating limited use of experiential and individualized pedagogical methods. No statistically significant differences emerged across demographic variables, suggesting strong consensus among respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings underscore the need to strengthen the learning activities domain to better support students’ development of functional skills and transition to employment. Curricular improvements should integrate practical, differentiated instructional strategies aligned with international standards. Such enhancements align with Vision 2030’s goals for inclusive, outcome-focused vocational education.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51351,"journal":{"name":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","volume":"165 ","pages":"Article 105100"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Teachers’ evaluation of vocational curriculum for secondary students with intellectual disabilities: An exploratory analysis from Saudi Arabia\",\"authors\":\"Hussain A. Almalky , Shaykhah M. Alqahtani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ridd.2025.105100\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Students with intellectual disabilities (ID) continue to face significant challenges in transitioning from school to employment. Vocational education plays a critical role in developing workforce skills and promoting independent living. Despite its importance, the effectiveness of vocational education for students with ID in Saudi Arabia has received limited empirical investigation. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the vocational curriculum through Tyler’s Curriculum Evaluation Theory and the Universal Design for Transition framework, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.</div></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><div>This study examined special education teachers’ perceptions of the vocational curriculum’s appropriateness for secondary students with ID in Saudi Arabia. It also explored whether these perceptions differed based on teachers’ qualifications, area of specialization, years of experience, or institutional setting.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A structured quantitative survey measured four curriculum domains: presentation style, content relevance, learning activities, and assessment methods. Data from 84 special education teachers in Riyadh were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, with effect sizes (Cohen’s d) reported. Reliability was confirmed via Cronbach’s alpha, and content validity was established through expert review.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Teachers generally rated the curriculum favorably, particularly regarding presentation style. In contrast, the learning activities domain received lower ratings, indicating limited use of experiential and individualized pedagogical methods. No statistically significant differences emerged across demographic variables, suggesting strong consensus among respondents.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings underscore the need to strengthen the learning activities domain to better support students’ development of functional skills and transition to employment. Curricular improvements should integrate practical, differentiated instructional strategies aligned with international standards. Such enhancements align with Vision 2030’s goals for inclusive, outcome-focused vocational education.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"volume\":\"165 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Developmental Disabilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225001842\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Developmental Disabilities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0891422225001842","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Teachers’ evaluation of vocational curriculum for secondary students with intellectual disabilities: An exploratory analysis from Saudi Arabia
Background
Students with intellectual disabilities (ID) continue to face significant challenges in transitioning from school to employment. Vocational education plays a critical role in developing workforce skills and promoting independent living. Despite its importance, the effectiveness of vocational education for students with ID in Saudi Arabia has received limited empirical investigation. This study addresses this gap by evaluating the vocational curriculum through Tyler’s Curriculum Evaluation Theory and the Universal Design for Transition framework, aligning with Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030.
Aims
This study examined special education teachers’ perceptions of the vocational curriculum’s appropriateness for secondary students with ID in Saudi Arabia. It also explored whether these perceptions differed based on teachers’ qualifications, area of specialization, years of experience, or institutional setting.
Methods
A structured quantitative survey measured four curriculum domains: presentation style, content relevance, learning activities, and assessment methods. Data from 84 special education teachers in Riyadh were analyzed using descriptive statistics and independent samples t-tests, with effect sizes (Cohen’s d) reported. Reliability was confirmed via Cronbach’s alpha, and content validity was established through expert review.
Results
Teachers generally rated the curriculum favorably, particularly regarding presentation style. In contrast, the learning activities domain received lower ratings, indicating limited use of experiential and individualized pedagogical methods. No statistically significant differences emerged across demographic variables, suggesting strong consensus among respondents.
Conclusion
These findings underscore the need to strengthen the learning activities domain to better support students’ development of functional skills and transition to employment. Curricular improvements should integrate practical, differentiated instructional strategies aligned with international standards. Such enhancements align with Vision 2030’s goals for inclusive, outcome-focused vocational education.
期刊介绍:
Research In Developmental Disabilities is aimed at publishing original research of an interdisciplinary nature that has a direct bearing on the remediation of problems associated with developmental disabilities. Manuscripts will be solicited throughout the world. Articles will be primarily empirical studies, although an occasional position paper or review will be accepted. The aim of the journal will be to publish articles on all aspects of research with the developmentally disabled, with any methodologically sound approach being acceptable.