谨慎行事:评估和增加妇产科住院医师教学和学习环境的心理安全

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Giuliana Guarna HBSc, MD, Jessica Murphy MSc, PhD, Sapna Sharma BHSc, MD
{"title":"谨慎行事:评估和增加妇产科住院医师教学和学习环境的心理安全","authors":"Giuliana Guarna HBSc, MD,&nbsp;Jessica Murphy MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Sapna Sharma BHSc, MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103653","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The primary objective of this study was to understand resident perspectives on psychological safety in a large Obstetrics/Gynecology program in Ontario, Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the impact of an educational session on psychological safety.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>A nine-question survey was sent to all residents to assess perspectives on psychological safety during training. Fischer’s exact test was used to explore associations between resident year (junior and senior) and associated perspectives on psychological safety. Based on perspectives expressed in the first survey, an educational session discussing the concept of psychological safety, strategies for increasing psychological safety, and links to resources was designed.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The survey was sent to all Obstetrics/Gynecology residents at McMaster, University, the third largest training program in Canada. The training session was presented at a virtual grand round; a pre- and post-session survey was distributed to attendees.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Nineteen residents (56%) completed the first survey. A significant association was found between year and belief that the learning environment was psychologically safe. Results suggested that juniors tended to disagree more with this statement than senior residents. No other significant associations were found; however, there was a pattern suggesting that junior residents had lower perceptions of psychological safety. Eighteen (43%) grand rounds participants completed the pre-intervention survey. The education session resulted in a higher percentage of people claiming knowledge of psychological safety, feeling psychologically safe in their work environment, and knowledge of resources related to psychological safety.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Overall, results suggest that junior residents may have lower levels of psychological safety than senior residents. In addition, an education session can increase awareness of educational concepts and where to access resources.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 10","pages":"Article 103653"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Proceed with Caution: Assessing for and Increasing Psychological Safety in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Teaching and Learning Environments\",\"authors\":\"Giuliana Guarna HBSc, MD,&nbsp;Jessica Murphy MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Sapna Sharma BHSc, MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103653\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>OBJECTIVE</h3><div>The primary objective of this study was to understand resident perspectives on psychological safety in a large Obstetrics/Gynecology program in Ontario, Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the impact of an educational session on psychological safety.</div></div><div><h3>DESIGN</h3><div>A nine-question survey was sent to all residents to assess perspectives on psychological safety during training. Fischer’s exact test was used to explore associations between resident year (junior and senior) and associated perspectives on psychological safety. Based on perspectives expressed in the first survey, an educational session discussing the concept of psychological safety, strategies for increasing psychological safety, and links to resources was designed.</div></div><div><h3>SETTING</h3><div>The survey was sent to all Obstetrics/Gynecology residents at McMaster, University, the third largest training program in Canada. The training session was presented at a virtual grand round; a pre- and post-session survey was distributed to attendees.</div></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><div>Nineteen residents (56%) completed the first survey. A significant association was found between year and belief that the learning environment was psychologically safe. Results suggested that juniors tended to disagree more with this statement than senior residents. No other significant associations were found; however, there was a pattern suggesting that junior residents had lower perceptions of psychological safety. Eighteen (43%) grand rounds participants completed the pre-intervention survey. The education session resulted in a higher percentage of people claiming knowledge of psychological safety, feeling psychologically safe in their work environment, and knowledge of resources related to psychological safety.</div></div><div><h3>CONCLUSION</h3><div>Overall, results suggest that junior residents may have lower levels of psychological safety than senior residents. In addition, an education session can increase awareness of educational concepts and where to access resources.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103653\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042500234X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S193172042500234X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的主要目的是了解加拿大安大略省一个大型妇产科项目的住院医师对心理安全的看法。第二个目标是描述一次教育会议对心理安全的影响。DESIGNA向所有住院医师发送了一份包含九个问题的调查问卷,以评估他们对培训期间心理安全的看法。Fischer的精确检验被用来探讨住院学生年级(大三和大四)与心理安全相关观点之间的关系。基于第一次调查中表达的观点,设计了一个教育会议,讨论心理安全的概念、增加心理安全的策略以及与资源的联系。该调查被发送给麦克马斯特大学的所有妇产科住院医师,这是加拿大第三大培训项目。培训课程在一个虚拟的大回合中进行;会议前和会议后的调查分发给与会者。结果19名居民(56%)完成了第一次调查。研究发现,年龄与学习环境在心理上是安全的信念之间存在显著关联。结果表明,青少年比老年人更不同意这一说法。没有发现其他显著的关联;然而,有一种模式表明,初级住院医师的心理安全感较低。18名(43%)大轮次参与者完成了干预前调查。教育课程导致更高比例的人声称了解心理安全,在工作环境中感到心理安全,并了解与心理安全相关的资源。结论总体而言,低龄住院医师的心理安全水平可能低于老年住院医师。此外,教育会议可以提高对教育概念和获取资源的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Proceed with Caution: Assessing for and Increasing Psychological Safety in Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Teaching and Learning Environments

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to understand resident perspectives on psychological safety in a large Obstetrics/Gynecology program in Ontario, Canada. The secondary objective was to describe the impact of an educational session on psychological safety.

DESIGN

A nine-question survey was sent to all residents to assess perspectives on psychological safety during training. Fischer’s exact test was used to explore associations between resident year (junior and senior) and associated perspectives on psychological safety. Based on perspectives expressed in the first survey, an educational session discussing the concept of psychological safety, strategies for increasing psychological safety, and links to resources was designed.

SETTING

The survey was sent to all Obstetrics/Gynecology residents at McMaster, University, the third largest training program in Canada. The training session was presented at a virtual grand round; a pre- and post-session survey was distributed to attendees.

RESULTS

Nineteen residents (56%) completed the first survey. A significant association was found between year and belief that the learning environment was psychologically safe. Results suggested that juniors tended to disagree more with this statement than senior residents. No other significant associations were found; however, there was a pattern suggesting that junior residents had lower perceptions of psychological safety. Eighteen (43%) grand rounds participants completed the pre-intervention survey. The education session resulted in a higher percentage of people claiming knowledge of psychological safety, feeling psychologically safe in their work environment, and knowledge of resources related to psychological safety.

CONCLUSION

Overall, results suggest that junior residents may have lower levels of psychological safety than senior residents. In addition, an education session can increase awareness of educational concepts and where to access resources.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Surgical Education
Journal of Surgical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
261
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信