大型语言模型的包容性提示工程:道德、结构化和自适应人工智能的模块化框架

IF 13.9 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mohamad Saleh Torkestani, Ali Alameer, Shivakumara Palaiahnakote, Taha Manosuri
{"title":"大型语言模型的包容性提示工程:道德、结构化和自适应人工智能的模块化框架","authors":"Mohamad Saleh Torkestani,&nbsp;Ali Alameer,&nbsp;Shivakumara Palaiahnakote,&nbsp;Taha Manosuri","doi":"10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Large language models have achieved impressive results across various tasks but remain limited in their ability to adapt ethically and structurally across diverse domains without retraining. This paper presents the Inclusive Prompt Engineering Model (IPEM), a modular framework designed to enhance LLM performance, adaptability, and ethical alignment through prompt-level strategies alone. IPEM integrates four components: Memory-of-Thought for multi-turn consistency, Enhanced Chain-of-Thought prompting for logical verification, Structured and Analogical Reasoning modules for tabular and cross-domain tasks, and Evaluation and Feedback Loops that incorporate uncertainty-aware selection and bias mitigation mechanisms. Evaluated across tasks in arithmetic reasoning, healthcare triage, financial forecasting, and inclusive question answering, IPEM consistently improves model outputs over a GPT-4 baseline. Notable outcomes include up to twenty percentage points in accuracy gains, a 25 percent reduction in logical errors, and nearly 20 percent reduction in social bias scores, all without modifying model weights. Moreover, IPEM reduces annotation demands by one-third while preserving performance, demonstrating its utility in low-resource environments. By unifying ethical safeguards and reasoning mechanisms in a prompt-based system, IPEM offers a reproducible and auditable pathway for deploying adaptable and fair AI systems. The framework contributes both practical solutions and theoretical insights to the evolving field of prompt engineering.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8449,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence Review","volume":"58 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inclusive prompt engineering for large language models: a modular framework for ethical, structured, and adaptive AI\",\"authors\":\"Mohamad Saleh Torkestani,&nbsp;Ali Alameer,&nbsp;Shivakumara Palaiahnakote,&nbsp;Taha Manosuri\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Large language models have achieved impressive results across various tasks but remain limited in their ability to adapt ethically and structurally across diverse domains without retraining. This paper presents the Inclusive Prompt Engineering Model (IPEM), a modular framework designed to enhance LLM performance, adaptability, and ethical alignment through prompt-level strategies alone. IPEM integrates four components: Memory-of-Thought for multi-turn consistency, Enhanced Chain-of-Thought prompting for logical verification, Structured and Analogical Reasoning modules for tabular and cross-domain tasks, and Evaluation and Feedback Loops that incorporate uncertainty-aware selection and bias mitigation mechanisms. Evaluated across tasks in arithmetic reasoning, healthcare triage, financial forecasting, and inclusive question answering, IPEM consistently improves model outputs over a GPT-4 baseline. Notable outcomes include up to twenty percentage points in accuracy gains, a 25 percent reduction in logical errors, and nearly 20 percent reduction in social bias scores, all without modifying model weights. Moreover, IPEM reduces annotation demands by one-third while preserving performance, demonstrating its utility in low-resource environments. By unifying ethical safeguards and reasoning mechanisms in a prompt-based system, IPEM offers a reproducible and auditable pathway for deploying adaptable and fair AI systems. The framework contributes both practical solutions and theoretical insights to the evolving field of prompt engineering.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8449,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"volume\":\"58 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":13.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artificial Intelligence Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence Review","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10462-025-11330-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大型语言模型在各种任务中取得了令人印象深刻的结果,但在不进行再培训的情况下,它们在道德和结构上适应不同领域的能力仍然有限。本文介绍了包容性提示工程模型(IPEM),这是一个模块化框架,旨在通过提示级策略提高法学硕士的绩效、适应性和道德一致性。IPEM集成了四个组件:用于多回合一致性的思维记忆,用于逻辑验证的增强思维链提示,用于表格和跨域任务的结构化和类比推理模块,以及包含不确定性感知选择和偏见缓解机制的评估和反馈循环。通过对算术推理、医疗分诊、财务预测和包容性问题回答等任务的评估,IPEM在GPT-4基线上不断改进模型输出。值得注意的结果包括准确率提高了20个百分点,逻辑错误减少了25%,社会偏见得分减少了近20%,所有这些都没有修改模型权重。此外,IPEM在保持性能的同时减少了三分之一的注释需求,这证明了它在低资源环境中的实用性。通过在基于提示的系统中统一道德保障和推理机制,IPEM为部署适应性强和公平的人工智能系统提供了可重复和可审计的途径。该框架为不断发展的提示工程领域提供了实践解决方案和理论见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inclusive prompt engineering for large language models: a modular framework for ethical, structured, and adaptive AI

Large language models have achieved impressive results across various tasks but remain limited in their ability to adapt ethically and structurally across diverse domains without retraining. This paper presents the Inclusive Prompt Engineering Model (IPEM), a modular framework designed to enhance LLM performance, adaptability, and ethical alignment through prompt-level strategies alone. IPEM integrates four components: Memory-of-Thought for multi-turn consistency, Enhanced Chain-of-Thought prompting for logical verification, Structured and Analogical Reasoning modules for tabular and cross-domain tasks, and Evaluation and Feedback Loops that incorporate uncertainty-aware selection and bias mitigation mechanisms. Evaluated across tasks in arithmetic reasoning, healthcare triage, financial forecasting, and inclusive question answering, IPEM consistently improves model outputs over a GPT-4 baseline. Notable outcomes include up to twenty percentage points in accuracy gains, a 25 percent reduction in logical errors, and nearly 20 percent reduction in social bias scores, all without modifying model weights. Moreover, IPEM reduces annotation demands by one-third while preserving performance, demonstrating its utility in low-resource environments. By unifying ethical safeguards and reasoning mechanisms in a prompt-based system, IPEM offers a reproducible and auditable pathway for deploying adaptable and fair AI systems. The framework contributes both practical solutions and theoretical insights to the evolving field of prompt engineering.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence Review
Artificial Intelligence Review 工程技术-计算机:人工智能
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
5.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence Review, a fully open access journal, publishes cutting-edge research in artificial intelligence and cognitive science. It features critical evaluations of applications, techniques, and algorithms, providing a platform for both researchers and application developers. The journal includes refereed survey and tutorial articles, along with reviews and commentary on significant developments in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信