手术机器人任务自动化的系统综述

IF 3.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Thomas E. Shkurti;M. Cenk Çavuşoğlu
{"title":"手术机器人任务自动化的系统综述","authors":"Thomas E. Shkurti;M. Cenk Çavuşoğlu","doi":"10.1109/TMRB.2025.3583182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The physically challenging and time-consuming nature of robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) presents an incentive for automation of routine surgical tasks. We perform a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in the automation of laparoscopic surgical robots for the tasks of suturing, retraction, incision/dissection/resection, palpation, and debridement. Particular attention is paid to the various performance metrics employed by different studies, and methodological accommodations that differ from operating-room conditions. We conclude that the field remains in an exploratory state and rigorous definitions of success or performance in a given subtask have yet to materialize.","PeriodicalId":73318,"journal":{"name":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","volume":"7 3","pages":"863-880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Review of Task Automation in Surgical Robotics\",\"authors\":\"Thomas E. Shkurti;M. Cenk Çavuşoğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMRB.2025.3583182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The physically challenging and time-consuming nature of robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) presents an incentive for automation of routine surgical tasks. We perform a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in the automation of laparoscopic surgical robots for the tasks of suturing, retraction, incision/dissection/resection, palpation, and debridement. Particular attention is paid to the various performance metrics employed by different studies, and methodological accommodations that differ from operating-room conditions. We conclude that the field remains in an exploratory state and rigorous definitions of success or performance in a given subtask have yet to materialize.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"863-880\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11051014/\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11051014/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器人微创手术(RMIS)的物理挑战和耗时的性质提出了常规手术任务自动化的动机。我们全面回顾了目前腹腔镜手术机器人在缝合、回缩、切开/剥离/切除、触诊和清创等方面的自动化技术。特别注意不同研究采用的各种性能指标,以及不同于手术室条件的方法调整。我们得出的结论是,该领域仍处于探索状态,在给定子任务中成功或表现的严格定义尚未实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Review of Task Automation in Surgical Robotics
The physically challenging and time-consuming nature of robotic minimally invasive surgery (RMIS) presents an incentive for automation of routine surgical tasks. We perform a comprehensive review of the current state of the art in the automation of laparoscopic surgical robots for the tasks of suturing, retraction, incision/dissection/resection, palpation, and debridement. Particular attention is paid to the various performance metrics employed by different studies, and methodological accommodations that differ from operating-room conditions. We conclude that the field remains in an exploratory state and rigorous definitions of success or performance in a given subtask have yet to materialize.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信