Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Wladimir J. Alonso, Cleo Verkuijl, Margaret Hegwood, Kate Hartcher
{"title":"福利足迹框架有助于平衡动物福利与食品系统的其他优先事项。","authors":"Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Wladimir J. Alonso, Cleo Verkuijl, Margaret Hegwood, Kate Hartcher","doi":"10.1038/s43016-025-01213-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Animal welfare lacks sufficient methods for quantitative inclusion in food system impact assessments. The Welfare Footprint Framework addresses this gap, revealing that adopting slower-growing breeds can prevent at least 15–100 hours of intense pain in chickens at an estimated cost of US$1 per kilogram of meat, or US$0.00003–0.00005 for each hour using carbon externality pricing.","PeriodicalId":94151,"journal":{"name":"Nature food","volume":"6 8","pages":"737-739"},"PeriodicalIF":21.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Welfare Footprint Framework can help balance animal welfare with other food system priorities\",\"authors\":\"Cynthia Schuck-Paim, Wladimir J. Alonso, Cleo Verkuijl, Margaret Hegwood, Kate Hartcher\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s43016-025-01213-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Animal welfare lacks sufficient methods for quantitative inclusion in food system impact assessments. The Welfare Footprint Framework addresses this gap, revealing that adopting slower-growing breeds can prevent at least 15–100 hours of intense pain in chickens at an estimated cost of US$1 per kilogram of meat, or US$0.00003–0.00005 for each hour using carbon externality pricing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature food\",\"volume\":\"6 8\",\"pages\":\"737-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature food\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01213-z\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature food","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s43016-025-01213-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Welfare Footprint Framework can help balance animal welfare with other food system priorities
Animal welfare lacks sufficient methods for quantitative inclusion in food system impact assessments. The Welfare Footprint Framework addresses this gap, revealing that adopting slower-growing breeds can prevent at least 15–100 hours of intense pain in chickens at an estimated cost of US$1 per kilogram of meat, or US$0.00003–0.00005 for each hour using carbon externality pricing.