国际参考定价规则在欧洲五国药品上市价格预测中的应用。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Milena Izmirlieva
{"title":"国际参考定价规则在欧洲五国药品上市价格预测中的应用。","authors":"Milena Izmirlieva","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether applying official International Reference Pricing (IRP) rules allows accurate prediction of pharmaceutical launch prices in Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, The Netherlands, and North Macedonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Official pre-2019-reform IRP regulations were examined, with 1 Dutch rule further clarified via primary research. IRP rules were applied precisely to calculate the maximum price under IRP for all new chemical/molecular entities presentations first priced in each country in 2018 and customarily subject to IRP, using POLI pricing and reimbursement data for the referrer and the reference countries. Maximum allowed launch prices under IRP were calculated by using prices available for referencing 1 month before launch, the regulation-specified exchange rate and the definition of what constitutes an acceptable product for referencing. If an identical pack size/formulation was not available or multiple suitable products for referencing existed, the appropriate conversion rules were applied as stated in the IRP regulations. The actual first price was compared with the price calculated under IRP for each new chemical or molecular entity presentation, with several scenarios run to explain discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the actual first price and the forecasted/IRP-based price across the sample was lowest for Bulgaria (3.04%), followed by The Netherlands (4.53%), Austria (4.91%), Croatia (9.63%), and North Macedonia (22.09%). North Macedonia's high MAPE is because the country allows prices to exceed the IRP-based price by up to 20%. MAPE < 10% indicates outstanding model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precise IRP rules application can accurately predict launch prices in countries where IRP is binding and is the main price-setting method.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of International Reference Pricing Rules to Forecast Pharmaceutical Launch Prices in 5 European Countries.\",\"authors\":\"Milena Izmirlieva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess whether applying official International Reference Pricing (IRP) rules allows accurate prediction of pharmaceutical launch prices in Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, The Netherlands, and North Macedonia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Official pre-2019-reform IRP regulations were examined, with 1 Dutch rule further clarified via primary research. IRP rules were applied precisely to calculate the maximum price under IRP for all new chemical/molecular entities presentations first priced in each country in 2018 and customarily subject to IRP, using POLI pricing and reimbursement data for the referrer and the reference countries. Maximum allowed launch prices under IRP were calculated by using prices available for referencing 1 month before launch, the regulation-specified exchange rate and the definition of what constitutes an acceptable product for referencing. If an identical pack size/formulation was not available or multiple suitable products for referencing existed, the appropriate conversion rules were applied as stated in the IRP regulations. The actual first price was compared with the price calculated under IRP for each new chemical or molecular entity presentation, with several scenarios run to explain discrepancies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the actual first price and the forecasted/IRP-based price across the sample was lowest for Bulgaria (3.04%), followed by The Netherlands (4.53%), Austria (4.91%), Croatia (9.63%), and North Macedonia (22.09%). North Macedonia's high MAPE is because the country allows prices to exceed the IRP-based price by up to 20%. MAPE < 10% indicates outstanding model performance.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Precise IRP rules application can accurately predict launch prices in countries where IRP is binding and is the main price-setting method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估应用官方国际参考定价(IRP)规则是否可以准确预测奥地利、保加利亚、克罗地亚、荷兰和北马其顿的药品上市价格。方法:审查2019年改革前的官方IRP法规,并通过初步研究进一步澄清了一项荷兰规则。IRP规则被精确地应用于计算IRP下的所有新化学/分子实体产品的最高价格,这些产品在2018年首次在每个国家定价,并且通常受IRP的约束,使用POLI定价和参考国家和参考国家的报销数据。IRP下允许的最高推出价格是根据推出前一个月可供参考的价格、规定的汇率和可供参考的可接受产品的定义来计算的。如果没有相同的包装尺寸/配方,或有多种合适的产品可供参考,则适用IRP条例所述的适当转换规则。实际的第一次价格与每次NCE展示的IRP下计算的价格进行了比较,并运行了几个场景来解释差异。结果:保加利亚的实际首次价格与基于irp的预测价格之间的平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)最低(3.04%),其次是荷兰(4.53%)、奥地利(4.91%)、克罗地亚(9.63%)和北马其顿(22.09%)。北马其顿的高MAPE是因为该国允许价格超过irp基础价格的20%。结论:在有IRP约束的国家,精确应用IRP规则可以准确预测上市价格,是主要的定价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Application of International Reference Pricing Rules to Forecast Pharmaceutical Launch Prices in 5 European Countries.

Objectives: To assess whether applying official International Reference Pricing (IRP) rules allows accurate prediction of pharmaceutical launch prices in Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, The Netherlands, and North Macedonia.

Methods: Official pre-2019-reform IRP regulations were examined, with 1 Dutch rule further clarified via primary research. IRP rules were applied precisely to calculate the maximum price under IRP for all new chemical/molecular entities presentations first priced in each country in 2018 and customarily subject to IRP, using POLI pricing and reimbursement data for the referrer and the reference countries. Maximum allowed launch prices under IRP were calculated by using prices available for referencing 1 month before launch, the regulation-specified exchange rate and the definition of what constitutes an acceptable product for referencing. If an identical pack size/formulation was not available or multiple suitable products for referencing existed, the appropriate conversion rules were applied as stated in the IRP regulations. The actual first price was compared with the price calculated under IRP for each new chemical or molecular entity presentation, with several scenarios run to explain discrepancies.

Results: The mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) between the actual first price and the forecasted/IRP-based price across the sample was lowest for Bulgaria (3.04%), followed by The Netherlands (4.53%), Austria (4.91%), Croatia (9.63%), and North Macedonia (22.09%). North Macedonia's high MAPE is because the country allows prices to exceed the IRP-based price by up to 20%. MAPE < 10% indicates outstanding model performance.

Conclusions: Precise IRP rules application can accurately predict launch prices in countries where IRP is binding and is the main price-setting method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信