Sarah Callinan, Simon D'Aquino, Ben Riordan, Jonas Raninen, Michael Livingston, Paul M Dietze, Gerhard Gmel, Robin Room
{"title":"调查问题的数量和频率在预测未来的酒精消费量上有不同的年龄。","authors":"Sarah Callinan, Simon D'Aquino, Ben Riordan, Jonas Raninen, Michael Livingston, Paul M Dietze, Gerhard Gmel, Robin Room","doi":"10.1111/dar.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross sectional research has demonstrated that screening tool questions on frequency of alcohol consumption are a better predictor of dependence and harmful drinking in younger adults; questions about quantity per occasion are a better predictor in older adults. The aim of this study is to see if this relationship also holds longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 9076 respondents aged 15 and over completed at least two waves of the longitudinal annual Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 10 years apart between 2001-2010 and 2012-2020. Standardised scores from responses to questions on drinking quantity and frequency in the first survey were used to predict consumption 10 years later in groups stratified by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frequency of consumption was a significantly better predictor of future consumption than quantity in younger drinkers (aged < 36; β = 9.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.6-10.0), than older drinkers (aged > 49; β = 5.1, 95% CI 4.8-5.5) while quantity was a better predictor in older drinkers (β = 8.2, 95% CI 7.2-9.3) than younger drinkers (β = 3.4, 95% CI 3.1-3.7).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Some commonly used screening items, such as drinking quantity and frequency, are differentially effective at identifying future heavy drinkers between age groups. Development of age-specific screening tools could potentially lead to more accurate identification of people who could benefit from intervention to reduce their alcohol consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":11318,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Survey Questions on Quantity and Frequency Are Differentially Effective by Age in Predicting Future Alcohol Consumption.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Callinan, Simon D'Aquino, Ben Riordan, Jonas Raninen, Michael Livingston, Paul M Dietze, Gerhard Gmel, Robin Room\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dar.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Cross sectional research has demonstrated that screening tool questions on frequency of alcohol consumption are a better predictor of dependence and harmful drinking in younger adults; questions about quantity per occasion are a better predictor in older adults. The aim of this study is to see if this relationship also holds longitudinally.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 9076 respondents aged 15 and over completed at least two waves of the longitudinal annual Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 10 years apart between 2001-2010 and 2012-2020. Standardised scores from responses to questions on drinking quantity and frequency in the first survey were used to predict consumption 10 years later in groups stratified by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Frequency of consumption was a significantly better predictor of future consumption than quantity in younger drinkers (aged < 36; β = 9.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.6-10.0), than older drinkers (aged > 49; β = 5.1, 95% CI 4.8-5.5) while quantity was a better predictor in older drinkers (β = 8.2, 95% CI 7.2-9.3) than younger drinkers (β = 3.4, 95% CI 3.1-3.7).</p><p><strong>Discussion and conclusions: </strong>Some commonly used screening items, such as drinking quantity and frequency, are differentially effective at identifying future heavy drinkers between age groups. Development of age-specific screening tools could potentially lead to more accurate identification of people who could benefit from intervention to reduce their alcohol consumption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70019\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dar.70019","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
简介:横断面研究表明,关于酒精消费频率的筛查工具问题可以更好地预测年轻人的依赖和有害饮酒;关于每次饮酒次数的问题在老年人中是一个更好的预测指标。这项研究的目的是看看这种关系是否也在纵向上成立。方法:共有9076名15岁及以上的受访者在2001-2010年和2012-2020年之间间隔10年完成了至少两波纵向年度澳大利亚家庭收入和劳动力动态调查。在第一次调查中,对饮酒量和频率问题的回答的标准化得分被用来预测10年后按年龄分层的人群的饮酒量。结果:在年轻饮酒者(49岁;β = 5.1, 95% CI 4.8-5.5)中,饮酒频率比饮酒数量更能预测未来饮酒,而在老年饮酒者(β = 8.2, 95% CI 7.2-9.3)中,饮酒数量比年轻饮酒者(β = 3.4, 95% CI 3.1-3.7)更能预测未来饮酒。讨论与结论:一些常用的筛查项目,如饮酒量和频率,在识别不同年龄组的未来重度饮酒者方面效果不同。开发针对特定年龄的筛查工具可能会更准确地识别出哪些人可以从干预中受益,从而减少饮酒量。
Survey Questions on Quantity and Frequency Are Differentially Effective by Age in Predicting Future Alcohol Consumption.
Introduction: Cross sectional research has demonstrated that screening tool questions on frequency of alcohol consumption are a better predictor of dependence and harmful drinking in younger adults; questions about quantity per occasion are a better predictor in older adults. The aim of this study is to see if this relationship also holds longitudinally.
Methods: A total of 9076 respondents aged 15 and over completed at least two waves of the longitudinal annual Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey 10 years apart between 2001-2010 and 2012-2020. Standardised scores from responses to questions on drinking quantity and frequency in the first survey were used to predict consumption 10 years later in groups stratified by age.
Results: Frequency of consumption was a significantly better predictor of future consumption than quantity in younger drinkers (aged < 36; β = 9.3, 95% confidence interval [CI] 8.6-10.0), than older drinkers (aged > 49; β = 5.1, 95% CI 4.8-5.5) while quantity was a better predictor in older drinkers (β = 8.2, 95% CI 7.2-9.3) than younger drinkers (β = 3.4, 95% CI 3.1-3.7).
Discussion and conclusions: Some commonly used screening items, such as drinking quantity and frequency, are differentially effective at identifying future heavy drinkers between age groups. Development of age-specific screening tools could potentially lead to more accurate identification of people who could benefit from intervention to reduce their alcohol consumption.
期刊介绍:
Drug and Alcohol Review is an international meeting ground for the views, expertise and experience of all those involved in studying alcohol, tobacco and drug problems. Contributors to the Journal examine and report on alcohol and drug use from a wide range of clinical, biomedical, epidemiological, psychological and sociological perspectives. Drug and Alcohol Review particularly encourages the submission of papers which have a harm reduction perspective. However, all philosophies will find a place in the Journal: the principal criterion for publication of papers is their quality.