{"title":"测量外科医生的情绪智力:范围回顾","authors":"Amelia Waller, Matthew Rickard","doi":"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary aim was to evaluate methods of measuring emotional intelligence (EI) in surgeons and surgical trainees. Secondary aims included examining the role of EI among surgeons, focusing on its impact on burnout, job satisfaction, patient-surgeon relationships, and teaching abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The study followed PRISMA guidelines, with a systematic search conducted in June 2024 across databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. A total of 444 articles were initially identified, with 75 articles undergoing full-text review, and 42 being deemed relevant. The review included studies published between 2008 and 2024, focusing on various surgical specialties and EI measurement tools.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The study involved reviewing literature from various institutions and healthcare settings, with a focus on surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The review targeted surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status. Exclusion criteria included nonsurgical populations, insufficient data, nonempirical studies, non-English language publications, inaccessible full texts, and poor methodological quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) was the most frequently used tool, appearing in 23 studies, followed by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), and Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT), among others. Higher EI scores were significantly associated with lower burnout levels among surgical residents and faculty, increased job satisfaction,<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> better patient-surgeon relationships,<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> and improved teaching and mentoring abilities.<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span> Gender differences were noted, with women scoring higher in emotionality and impulse control, and men scoring higher in sociability and stress management.<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> The review also highlighted the variability in EI measurement tools, with some assessments being more comprehensive but costly, while others were shorter and free but less thorough.<span><span><sup>4</sup></span></span><sup>,</sup><span><span><sup>5</sup></span></span><sup>,</sup><span><span><sup>6</sup></span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review highlights EI's role in reducing stress, preventing burnout, and improving surgical performance. However, the variation in EI tools and definitions complicates cross-study comparisons. Standardizing EI measurements is essential for consistent assessment and comparison. Incorporating EI training into surgical education is recommended, with further research needed to evaluate its impact</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50033,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Education","volume":"82 10","pages":"Article 103634"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Emotional Intelligence in Surgeons: A Scoping Review\",\"authors\":\"Amelia Waller, Matthew Rickard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsurg.2025.103634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The primary aim was to evaluate methods of measuring emotional intelligence (EI) in surgeons and surgical trainees. Secondary aims included examining the role of EI among surgeons, focusing on its impact on burnout, job satisfaction, patient-surgeon relationships, and teaching abilities.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>The study followed PRISMA guidelines, with a systematic search conducted in June 2024 across databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. A total of 444 articles were initially identified, with 75 articles undergoing full-text review, and 42 being deemed relevant. The review included studies published between 2008 and 2024, focusing on various surgical specialties and EI measurement tools.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>The study involved reviewing literature from various institutions and healthcare settings, with a focus on surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The review targeted surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status. Exclusion criteria included nonsurgical populations, insufficient data, nonempirical studies, non-English language publications, inaccessible full texts, and poor methodological quality.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) was the most frequently used tool, appearing in 23 studies, followed by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), and Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT), among others. Higher EI scores were significantly associated with lower burnout levels among surgical residents and faculty, increased job satisfaction,<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> better patient-surgeon relationships,<span><span><sup>2</sup></span></span> and improved teaching and mentoring abilities.<span><span><sup>3</sup></span></span> Gender differences were noted, with women scoring higher in emotionality and impulse control, and men scoring higher in sociability and stress management.<span><span><sup>1</sup></span></span> The review also highlighted the variability in EI measurement tools, with some assessments being more comprehensive but costly, while others were shorter and free but less thorough.<span><span><sup>4</sup></span></span><sup>,</sup><span><span><sup>5</sup></span></span><sup>,</sup><span><span><sup>6</sup></span></span></div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The review highlights EI's role in reducing stress, preventing burnout, and improving surgical performance. However, the variation in EI tools and definitions complicates cross-study comparisons. Standardizing EI measurements is essential for consistent assessment and comparison. Incorporating EI training into surgical education is recommended, with further research needed to evaluate its impact</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"volume\":\"82 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 103634\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Surgical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002156\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1931720425002156","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring Emotional Intelligence in Surgeons: A Scoping Review
Objective
The primary aim was to evaluate methods of measuring emotional intelligence (EI) in surgeons and surgical trainees. Secondary aims included examining the role of EI among surgeons, focusing on its impact on burnout, job satisfaction, patient-surgeon relationships, and teaching abilities.
Design
The study followed PRISMA guidelines, with a systematic search conducted in June 2024 across databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus. A total of 444 articles were initially identified, with 75 articles undergoing full-text review, and 42 being deemed relevant. The review included studies published between 2008 and 2024, focusing on various surgical specialties and EI measurement tools.
Setting
The study involved reviewing literature from various institutions and healthcare settings, with a focus on surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status.
Participants
The review targeted surgeons across all specialties at or above residency status. Exclusion criteria included nonsurgical populations, insufficient data, nonempirical studies, non-English language publications, inaccessible full texts, and poor methodological quality.
Results
The Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue) was the most frequently used tool, appearing in 23 studies, followed by the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSCEIT), Bar-On Emotional Quotient Inventory (EQ-i), and Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence Test (SSEIT), among others. Higher EI scores were significantly associated with lower burnout levels among surgical residents and faculty, increased job satisfaction,1 better patient-surgeon relationships,2 and improved teaching and mentoring abilities.3 Gender differences were noted, with women scoring higher in emotionality and impulse control, and men scoring higher in sociability and stress management.1 The review also highlighted the variability in EI measurement tools, with some assessments being more comprehensive but costly, while others were shorter and free but less thorough.4,5,6
Conclusions
The review highlights EI's role in reducing stress, preventing burnout, and improving surgical performance. However, the variation in EI tools and definitions complicates cross-study comparisons. Standardizing EI measurements is essential for consistent assessment and comparison. Incorporating EI training into surgical education is recommended, with further research needed to evaluate its impact
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Surgical Education (JSE) is dedicated to advancing the field of surgical education through original research. The journal publishes research articles in all surgical disciplines on topics relative to the education of surgical students, residents, and fellows, as well as practicing surgeons. Our readers look to JSE for timely, innovative research findings from the international surgical education community. As the official journal of the Association of Program Directors in Surgery (APDS), JSE publishes the proceedings of the annual APDS meeting held during Surgery Education Week.