A4SLR:一个人工智能辅助的系统性文献综述框架,以增强HEOR和HTA的证据合成。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Kyeryoung Lee, Hunki Paek, Nneka Ofoegbu, Steven Rube, Mitchell K Higashi, Dalia Dawoud, Hua Xu, Lizheng Shi, Xiaoyan Wang
{"title":"A4SLR:一个人工智能辅助的系统性文献综述框架,以增强HEOR和HTA的证据合成。","authors":"Kyeryoung Lee, Hunki Paek, Nneka Ofoegbu, Steven Rube, Mitchell K Higashi, Dalia Dawoud, Hua Xu, Lizheng Shi, Xiaoyan Wang","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are essential for synthesizing high-quality evidence in clinical research, health economics and outcome research (HEOR), and health technology assessments (HTAs). However, the growing volume of published data has made SLRs time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To address these challenges, we introduce A4SLR, an Agentic Artificial intelligence (AI)-Assisted SLR framework, that provides a flexible, extensible methodology for automating the entire SLR process-from initial query formulation to evidence synthesis-across various study fields.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A4SLR comprises eight modules integrated with specialized AI agents powered by large language models: Search, I/E criteria deployment, Abstract/full-text screening, Text/table pre-processing, Data extraction, Assessment, Risk of bias analysis, and Report. We implemented and validated this framework using two use cases, non-small cell lung cancer and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. Performance of the assessment was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our implementation demonstrated high accuracy in article screening (F1 scores:0.917-0.977), risk of bias assessment (Cohen's κ:0.8442-0.9064), and data extraction (F-scores:0.96-0.998), including patient characteristics, safety and efficacy-outcomes, economic model parameters, and cost-effectiveness data. Notably, the Text/table pre-processing agent yielded comprehensive coverage of data elements, particularly in the challenging tasks of accurately matching outcome values to their corresponding study arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the potential of the A4SLR framework to transform the evidence synthesis process by addressing the limitations of manual SLRs, thereby enhancing HEOR and HTAs. Designed as a scalable, user-centric, extensible approach, A4SLR provides a robust solution for generating comprehensive up-to-date evidence to support researchers and decision-makers across diverse clinical and therapeutic areas.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A4SLR: An Agentic AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for HEOR and HTA.\",\"authors\":\"Kyeryoung Lee, Hunki Paek, Nneka Ofoegbu, Steven Rube, Mitchell K Higashi, Dalia Dawoud, Hua Xu, Lizheng Shi, Xiaoyan Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are essential for synthesizing high-quality evidence in clinical research, health economics and outcome research (HEOR), and health technology assessments (HTAs). However, the growing volume of published data has made SLRs time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To address these challenges, we introduce A4SLR, an Agentic Artificial intelligence (AI)-Assisted SLR framework, that provides a flexible, extensible methodology for automating the entire SLR process-from initial query formulation to evidence synthesis-across various study fields.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A4SLR comprises eight modules integrated with specialized AI agents powered by large language models: Search, I/E criteria deployment, Abstract/full-text screening, Text/table pre-processing, Data extraction, Assessment, Risk of bias analysis, and Report. We implemented and validated this framework using two use cases, non-small cell lung cancer and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. Performance of the assessment was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our implementation demonstrated high accuracy in article screening (F1 scores:0.917-0.977), risk of bias assessment (Cohen's κ:0.8442-0.9064), and data extraction (F-scores:0.96-0.998), including patient characteristics, safety and efficacy-outcomes, economic model parameters, and cost-effectiveness data. Notably, the Text/table pre-processing agent yielded comprehensive coverage of data elements, particularly in the challenging tasks of accurately matching outcome values to their corresponding study arms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings highlight the potential of the A4SLR framework to transform the evidence synthesis process by addressing the limitations of manual SLRs, thereby enhancing HEOR and HTAs. Designed as a scalable, user-centric, extensible approach, A4SLR provides a robust solution for generating comprehensive up-to-date evidence to support researchers and decision-makers across diverse clinical and therapeutic areas.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.002\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.08.002","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:系统文献综述(SLRs)是临床研究、卫生经济学和结果研究(HEOR)以及卫生技术评估(hta)中综合高质量证据的关键。然而,不断增长的发布数据量使得单反相机耗时、费力且昂贵。为了应对这些挑战,我们引入了A4SLR,一个人工智能(AI)辅助单反框架,它提供了一个灵活的、可扩展的方法来自动化整个单反过程,从最初的查询公式到证据合成,跨越各个研究领域。方法:A4SLR包括8个模块,其中集成了由大型语言模型驱动的专业人工智能代理:搜索、I/E标准部署、摘要/全文筛选、文本/表格预处理、数据提取、评估、偏倚风险分析和报告。我们通过非小细胞肺癌和围产期情绪和焦虑症两个用例实施并验证了这一框架。对评估的绩效进行了定量和定性评价。结果:我们的实施在文章筛选(F1评分:0.917-0.977)、偏倚风险评估(Cohen's κ:0.8442-0.9064)和数据提取(f评分:0.96-0.998)方面显示出较高的准确性,包括患者特征、安全性和有效性结局、经济模型参数和成本-效果数据。值得注意的是,文本/表格预处理代理产生了数据元素的全面覆盖,特别是在将结果值与相应研究分组准确匹配的具有挑战性的任务中。结论:我们的研究结果强调了A4SLR框架通过解决手动单反的局限性来改变证据合成过程的潜力,从而提高了HEOR和hta。作为一种可扩展的、以用户为中心的、可扩展的方法,A4SLR提供了一个强大的解决方案,用于生成全面的最新证据,以支持不同临床和治疗领域的研究人员和决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A4SLR: An Agentic AI-Assisted Systematic Literature Review Framework to Augment Evidence Synthesis for HEOR and HTA.

Objectives: Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are essential for synthesizing high-quality evidence in clinical research, health economics and outcome research (HEOR), and health technology assessments (HTAs). However, the growing volume of published data has made SLRs time-consuming, labor-intensive, and costly. To address these challenges, we introduce A4SLR, an Agentic Artificial intelligence (AI)-Assisted SLR framework, that provides a flexible, extensible methodology for automating the entire SLR process-from initial query formulation to evidence synthesis-across various study fields.

Methods: A4SLR comprises eight modules integrated with specialized AI agents powered by large language models: Search, I/E criteria deployment, Abstract/full-text screening, Text/table pre-processing, Data extraction, Assessment, Risk of bias analysis, and Report. We implemented and validated this framework using two use cases, non-small cell lung cancer and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. Performance of the assessment was evaluated quantitatively and qualitatively.

Results: Our implementation demonstrated high accuracy in article screening (F1 scores:0.917-0.977), risk of bias assessment (Cohen's κ:0.8442-0.9064), and data extraction (F-scores:0.96-0.998), including patient characteristics, safety and efficacy-outcomes, economic model parameters, and cost-effectiveness data. Notably, the Text/table pre-processing agent yielded comprehensive coverage of data elements, particularly in the challenging tasks of accurately matching outcome values to their corresponding study arms.

Conclusions: Our findings highlight the potential of the A4SLR framework to transform the evidence synthesis process by addressing the limitations of manual SLRs, thereby enhancing HEOR and HTAs. Designed as a scalable, user-centric, extensible approach, A4SLR provides a robust solution for generating comprehensive up-to-date evidence to support researchers and decision-makers across diverse clinical and therapeutic areas.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信