益生菌对非传染性疾病中与炎症相关的氧化/亚硝化应激和损伤标志物的影响:随机安慰剂对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.4 2区 生物学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Natanny Swerts Silva, Cláudio Daniel Cerdeira, Tiago Marques Dos Reis, Maria Rita Rodrigues
{"title":"益生菌对非传染性疾病中与炎症相关的氧化/亚硝化应激和损伤标志物的影响:随机安慰剂对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Natanny Swerts Silva, Cláudio Daniel Cerdeira, Tiago Marques Dos Reis, Maria Rita Rodrigues","doi":"10.1007/s12602-025-10710-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inflammation and oxidative/nitrosative stress (O&NS) are serious complications in non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including endocrine and metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. The beneficial probiotic microbes, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus, can decrease O&NS and inflammation. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with aims to elucidate the effects of probiotics on O&NS and inflammation in NCDs. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE resulted in the inclusion of studies if they met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data (combined effect size) were analyzed using Meta-Essentials software. Fifteen studies/16 trials with a total of 807 participants (421 cases/386 controls) were reviewed. There was high and moderate certainty of evidence (GRADE) for the effectiveness of probiotic intervention (vs. placebo) in increasing (↑) glutathione (GSH) levels (SMD(SE) = 0.89 (0.51)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.23 to 2.1, I<sup>2</sup> = 92.77%) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD(SE) = 0. 75 (0.22)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.23, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.50%) as well as decreased (↓) malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD(SE) = 1.03 (0.31)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.7, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.88%) and C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (SMD(SE) = 0.74 (0.36)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.07 to 1.55, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.32%). There were no effects on nitric oxide, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Subgroup analysis to reduce heterogeneity indicated probiotic effectiveness on strain number (one/↑GSH), age bracket (41-60 years/↓MDA or > 61 years/↓hsCRP), and NCD (nervous system/neurodegenerative diseases/↑GSH and ↓hsCRP or rheumatoid arthritis/polycystic ovary syndrome/↑TAC). An overall low risk of bias was observed. In conclusion, probiotics may have beneficial effects on markers of O&NS and inflammation in patients with NCDs.</p>","PeriodicalId":20506,"journal":{"name":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Probiotics on Markers of Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress and Damage Associated with Inflammation in Non-communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Natanny Swerts Silva, Cláudio Daniel Cerdeira, Tiago Marques Dos Reis, Maria Rita Rodrigues\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12602-025-10710-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Inflammation and oxidative/nitrosative stress (O&NS) are serious complications in non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including endocrine and metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. The beneficial probiotic microbes, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus, can decrease O&NS and inflammation. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with aims to elucidate the effects of probiotics on O&NS and inflammation in NCDs. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE resulted in the inclusion of studies if they met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data (combined effect size) were analyzed using Meta-Essentials software. Fifteen studies/16 trials with a total of 807 participants (421 cases/386 controls) were reviewed. There was high and moderate certainty of evidence (GRADE) for the effectiveness of probiotic intervention (vs. placebo) in increasing (↑) glutathione (GSH) levels (SMD(SE) = 0.89 (0.51)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.23 to 2.1, I<sup>2</sup> = 92.77%) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD(SE) = 0. 75 (0.22)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.23, I<sup>2</sup> = 87.50%) as well as decreased (↓) malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD(SE) = 1.03 (0.31)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.7, I<sup>2</sup> = 93.88%) and C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (SMD(SE) = 0.74 (0.36)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.07 to 1.55, I<sup>2</sup> = 94.32%). There were no effects on nitric oxide, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Subgroup analysis to reduce heterogeneity indicated probiotic effectiveness on strain number (one/↑GSH), age bracket (41-60 years/↓MDA or > 61 years/↓hsCRP), and NCD (nervous system/neurodegenerative diseases/↑GSH and ↓hsCRP or rheumatoid arthritis/polycystic ovary syndrome/↑TAC). An overall low risk of bias was observed. In conclusion, probiotics may have beneficial effects on markers of O&NS and inflammation in patients with NCDs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-025-10710-3\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12602-025-10710-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

炎症和氧化/亚硝化应激(O&NS)是包括内分泌、代谢和神经退行性疾病在内的非传染性疾病(NCDs)的严重并发症。有益的益生菌,如乳酸杆菌、双歧杆菌和链球菌,可以减少O&NS和炎症。我们对随机对照试验(rct)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,旨在阐明益生菌对非传染性疾病O&NS和炎症的影响。通过对PubMed、Scopus和EMBASE的系统检索,如果符合入选标准,就可以纳入研究。采用Cochrane风险偏倚2工具评估方法学质量。使用Meta-Essentials软件分析数据(综合效应量)。我们回顾了15项研究/16项试验,共807名参与者(421例/386例对照)。对于益生菌干预(相对于安慰剂)在增加谷胱甘肽(GSH)水平(SMD(SE) = 0.89 (0.51)/p 2 = 92.77%)和总抗氧化能力(TAC) (SMD(SE) = 0)方面的有效性,有高和中等确定性的证据(GRADE)。75 (0.22) / p 2 = 87.50%)以及减少(↓)丙二醛(MDA) (SMD (SE) = 1.03 (0.31) / p 2 = 93.88%)和c反应蛋白(hsCRP) (SMD (SE) = 0.74 (0.36) / p 2 = 94.32%)。对一氧化氮、8-羟基-2′-脱氧鸟苷、白细胞介素-6和肿瘤坏死因子-α均无影响。亚组分析以减少异质性显示益生菌对菌株数量(1 /↑GSH)、年龄(41-60岁/↓MDA或bbb61岁/↓hsCRP)和NCD(神经系统/神经退行性疾病/↑GSH和↓hsCRP或类风湿关节炎/多囊卵巢综合征/↑TAC)的有效性。总体偏倚风险较低。综上所述,益生菌可能对非传染性疾病患者的O&NS和炎症标志物有有益作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Probiotics on Markers of Oxidative/Nitrosative Stress and Damage Associated with Inflammation in Non-communicable Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trials.

Inflammation and oxidative/nitrosative stress (O&NS) are serious complications in non-communicable diseases (NCDs), including endocrine and metabolic and neurodegenerative diseases. The beneficial probiotic microbes, such as Lactobacillus, Bifidobacterium, and Streptococcus, can decrease O&NS and inflammation. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with aims to elucidate the effects of probiotics on O&NS and inflammation in NCDs. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE resulted in the inclusion of studies if they met the eligibility criteria. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. Data (combined effect size) were analyzed using Meta-Essentials software. Fifteen studies/16 trials with a total of 807 participants (421 cases/386 controls) were reviewed. There was high and moderate certainty of evidence (GRADE) for the effectiveness of probiotic intervention (vs. placebo) in increasing (↑) glutathione (GSH) levels (SMD(SE) = 0.89 (0.51)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.23 to 2.1, I2 = 92.77%) and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) (SMD(SE) = 0. 75 (0.22)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.23, I2 = 87.50%) as well as decreased (↓) malondialdehyde (MDA) (SMD(SE) = 1.03 (0.31)/p < 0.01, 95%CI 0.37 to 1.7, I2 = 93.88%) and C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (SMD(SE) = 0.74 (0.36)/p < 0.05, 95%CI - 0.07 to 1.55, I2 = 94.32%). There were no effects on nitric oxide, 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-α. Subgroup analysis to reduce heterogeneity indicated probiotic effectiveness on strain number (one/↑GSH), age bracket (41-60 years/↓MDA or > 61 years/↓hsCRP), and NCD (nervous system/neurodegenerative diseases/↑GSH and ↓hsCRP or rheumatoid arthritis/polycystic ovary syndrome/↑TAC). An overall low risk of bias was observed. In conclusion, probiotics may have beneficial effects on markers of O&NS and inflammation in patients with NCDs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins
Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGYMICROB-MICROBIOLOGY
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
140
期刊介绍: Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins publishes reviews, original articles, letters and short notes and technical/methodological communications aimed at advancing fundamental knowledge and exploration of the applications of probiotics, natural antimicrobial proteins and their derivatives in biomedical, agricultural, veterinary, food, and cosmetic products. The Journal welcomes fundamental research articles and reports on applications of these microorganisms and substances, and encourages structural studies and studies that correlate the structure and functional properties of antimicrobial proteins.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信