II期随机胶质瘤研究,评估洛匹坦加昂丹西琼预防放化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效和满意度。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-01-28 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npaf014
Mary Lou Affronti, Mallika P Patel, Erin K Severance, Charles Loughlin, Claire Bradbury, James E Herndon, Kendra Boyd, Eric S Lipp, Henry S Friedman, Annick Desjardins, Margaret O Johnson, Katherine B Peters
{"title":"II期随机胶质瘤研究,评估洛匹坦加昂丹西琼预防放化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的疗效和满意度。","authors":"Mary Lou Affronti, Mallika P Patel, Erin K Severance, Charles Loughlin, Claire Bradbury, James E Herndon, Kendra Boyd, Eric S Lipp, Henry S Friedman, Annick Desjardins, Margaret O Johnson, Katherine B Peters","doi":"10.1093/nop/npaf014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nausea and vomiting remain feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Antiemetic guideline trials exclude malignant glioma patients. In patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea; vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35% and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and cancer control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized phase-II open-label trial, evaluated efficacy, patient preference, and satisfaction of ondansetron (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3 h-half-life) monotherapy versus rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180 h-half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6 weeks of temozolomide (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day × 42 day) with radiation. Fifty-three eligible patients were randomized to Sequence-A (ondansetron-8 mg days: 1-42, day 22 rolapitant-180 mg) or Sequence-B (rolapitant day 1 plus daily ondansetron). <i>Primary endpoint</i> was percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (no vomiting/antiemetic rescue) during the <i>first 2 weeks</i> of radiation. <i>Secondary endpoints</i>: cRIN/cRIV rates, preference/satisfaction for rolapitant/ondansetron, toxicity, and adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight (Sequence-A: 25; Sequnce-B: 23) initiated chemoradiation. Mean age = 53, 58% male, 73% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90%, and 73% glioblastoma. During first 2 weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 57% with ondansetron and 74% receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (<i>P</i> = .27). Patient-reported 6-week cRINV-CR was 55% for both arms. First 2-week cRIN rates (38% Sequence-A; 32% Sequence-B) were more than cRIV rates (19% Sequence-A; 0% Sequence-B). Patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited more during the first 2 weeks and overall (26%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (11%). Among 35 completers, 20% preferred rolapitant/ondansetron, 60% preferred ondansetron, and 20% had no preference (<i>P</i> = .0004). Adverse-events attributable to antiemetics were grade 1-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference was found in cRINV-CRs between the first 2-week treatments or overall satisfaction. Although not a positive study, less vomiting occurred with rolapitant/ondansetron. While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, most perceived better effectiveness with rolapitant/ondansetron.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"618-630"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349775/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phase II randomized glioma study to evaluate efficacy and satisfaction of rolapitant plus ondansetron in preventing chemoradiation-induced nausea and vomiting.\",\"authors\":\"Mary Lou Affronti, Mallika P Patel, Erin K Severance, Charles Loughlin, Claire Bradbury, James E Herndon, Kendra Boyd, Eric S Lipp, Henry S Friedman, Annick Desjardins, Margaret O Johnson, Katherine B Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npaf014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nausea and vomiting remain feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Antiemetic guideline trials exclude malignant glioma patients. In patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea; vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35% and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and cancer control.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized phase-II open-label trial, evaluated efficacy, patient preference, and satisfaction of ondansetron (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3 h-half-life) monotherapy versus rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180 h-half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6 weeks of temozolomide (75 mg/m<sup>2</sup>/day × 42 day) with radiation. Fifty-three eligible patients were randomized to Sequence-A (ondansetron-8 mg days: 1-42, day 22 rolapitant-180 mg) or Sequence-B (rolapitant day 1 plus daily ondansetron). <i>Primary endpoint</i> was percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (no vomiting/antiemetic rescue) during the <i>first 2 weeks</i> of radiation. <i>Secondary endpoints</i>: cRIN/cRIV rates, preference/satisfaction for rolapitant/ondansetron, toxicity, and adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-eight (Sequence-A: 25; Sequnce-B: 23) initiated chemoradiation. Mean age = 53, 58% male, 73% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90%, and 73% glioblastoma. During first 2 weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 57% with ondansetron and 74% receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (<i>P</i> = .27). Patient-reported 6-week cRINV-CR was 55% for both arms. First 2-week cRIN rates (38% Sequence-A; 32% Sequence-B) were more than cRIV rates (19% Sequence-A; 0% Sequence-B). Patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited more during the first 2 weeks and overall (26%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (11%). Among 35 completers, 20% preferred rolapitant/ondansetron, 60% preferred ondansetron, and 20% had no preference (<i>P</i> = .0004). Adverse-events attributable to antiemetics were grade 1-2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No difference was found in cRINV-CRs between the first 2-week treatments or overall satisfaction. Although not a positive study, less vomiting occurred with rolapitant/ondansetron. While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, most perceived better effectiveness with rolapitant/ondansetron.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"618-630\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349775/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf014\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:恶心和呕吐仍然令人担心癌症治疗相关的副作用。止吐指南试验排除了恶性胶质瘤患者。在同时接受替莫唑胺放疗的患者中,放化疗引起的恶心;呕吐(cRINV)率分别为35%和26%,这降低了生活质量、治疗依从性和癌症控制。方法:这项随机ii期开放标签试验,评估了昂丹司琼(短效5HT3-RA;3 h半衰期)单药治疗与罗拉匹坦(长效NK1-RA;在替莫唑胺(75 mg/m2/天× 42天)放射治疗6周期间,180 h半衰期)加昂丹司琼预防cRINV。53名符合条件的患者被随机分配到序列- a(昂丹西酮- 8mg天:1-42天,22天罗拉吡坦- 180mg)或序列- b(罗拉吡坦第1天加每日昂丹西酮)。主要终点是放疗前2周达到crv完全缓解(无呕吐/止吐救援)的百分比。次要终点:cRIN/cRIV率、罗拉匹坦/昂丹司琼的偏好/满意度、毒性和依从性。结果:48例(序列a: 25例;序列b: 23)开始放化疗。平均年龄53岁,58%为男性,73%为Karnofsky performance status (KPS), 90%为KPS, 73%为胶质母细胞瘤。在放疗的前2周,接受昂丹司琼治疗的crv - cr为57%,接受洛瑞匹坦/昂丹司琼治疗的crv - cr为74% (P = 0.27)。两组患者报告的6周crv - cr均为55%。前2周cRIN率(38%;32%序列- b)高于cRIV发生率(19%序列- a;Sequence-B 0%)。单独接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者在前2周呕吐较多(26%),而接受罗拉匹坦/昂丹司琼治疗的患者呕吐较多(11%)。在35名完成者中,20%的患者首选洛瑞匹坦/昂丹司琼,60%的患者首选昂丹司琼,20%的患者无偏好(P = 0.0004)。止吐药引起的不良事件为1-2级。结论:两组治疗前2周的crv - crs及总体满意度无差异。虽然不是阳性研究,但洛匹坦/昂丹西琼组的呕吐发生率较低。虽然患者更喜欢昂丹司琼单药治疗,但大多数人认为罗拉匹坦/昂丹司琼联合治疗效果更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phase II randomized glioma study to evaluate efficacy and satisfaction of rolapitant plus ondansetron in preventing chemoradiation-induced nausea and vomiting.

Background: Nausea and vomiting remain feared cancer treatment-related side effects. Antiemetic guideline trials exclude malignant glioma patients. In patients receiving radiation with concurrent temozolomide, chemoradiation-induced nausea; vomiting (cRINV) rates are 35% and 26%, respectively, which reduce quality of life, treatment adherence, and cancer control.

Methods: This randomized phase-II open-label trial, evaluated efficacy, patient preference, and satisfaction of ondansetron (short-acting 5HT3-RA; 3 h-half-life) monotherapy versus rolapitant (long-acting NK1-RA; 180 h-half-life) plus ondansetron in preventing cRINV during 6 weeks of temozolomide (75 mg/m2/day × 42 day) with radiation. Fifty-three eligible patients were randomized to Sequence-A (ondansetron-8 mg days: 1-42, day 22 rolapitant-180 mg) or Sequence-B (rolapitant day 1 plus daily ondansetron). Primary endpoint was percentage achieving cRINV-complete response (no vomiting/antiemetic rescue) during the first 2 weeks of radiation. Secondary endpoints: cRIN/cRIV rates, preference/satisfaction for rolapitant/ondansetron, toxicity, and adherence.

Results: Forty-eight (Sequence-A: 25; Sequnce-B: 23) initiated chemoradiation. Mean age = 53, 58% male, 73% Karnofsky performance status (KPS) > 90%, and 73% glioblastoma. During first 2 weeks of radiation, cRINV-CR was 57% with ondansetron and 74% receiving rolapitant/ondansetron (P = .27). Patient-reported 6-week cRINV-CR was 55% for both arms. First 2-week cRIN rates (38% Sequence-A; 32% Sequence-B) were more than cRIV rates (19% Sequence-A; 0% Sequence-B). Patients receiving ondansetron alone vomited more during the first 2 weeks and overall (26%) than with rolapitant/ondansetron (11%). Among 35 completers, 20% preferred rolapitant/ondansetron, 60% preferred ondansetron, and 20% had no preference (P = .0004). Adverse-events attributable to antiemetics were grade 1-2.

Conclusions: No difference was found in cRINV-CRs between the first 2-week treatments or overall satisfaction. Although not a positive study, less vomiting occurred with rolapitant/ondansetron. While patients prefer ondansetron monotherapy, most perceived better effectiveness with rolapitant/ondansetron.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信