评估液体活检生物标志物早期检测脑转移:一项系统综述。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npaf032
Jinyue Yu, Craig Paterson, Phillippa Davies, Jennifer C Palmer, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian
{"title":"评估液体活检生物标志物早期检测脑转移:一项系统综述。","authors":"Jinyue Yu, Craig Paterson, Phillippa Davies, Jennifer C Palmer, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian","doi":"10.1093/nop/npaf032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and BMs. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies involving 5676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (eg, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localized tumor to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"600-617"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349767/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of brain metastasis: A systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Jinyue Yu, Craig Paterson, Phillippa Davies, Jennifer C Palmer, Julian P T Higgins, Kathreena M Kurian\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npaf032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and BMs. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one studies involving 5676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (eg, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localized tumor to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"600-617\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349767/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脑转移瘤(Brain metastasis, BMs)是成人最常见的颅内恶性肿瘤,对癌症相关的发病率和死亡率有重要影响。早期发现对于优化治疗和提高生存率至关重要。本系统综述评估液体活检生物标志物在检测肺癌、乳腺癌和其他癌症中的诊断潜力。方法:在MEDLINE、Embase和BIOSIS数据库中使用与液体活检、生物标志物和脑转移相关的关键词进行全面检索。独立提取参与者特征、诊断参考标准、生物标志物类型、原发性癌症起源和诊断结果的数据。通过敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)评估诊断效果。使用QUADAS-2工具评估偏倚风险。结果:纳入31项研究,涉及5676名受试者,评估生物标志物,如cfDNA、miRNAs、蛋白质(如神经丝光[NfL]、胶质纤维酸性蛋白[GFAP]、S100B)、代谢组学特征和多标记模型。NfL和GFAP成为最有希望的生物标志物,在多种癌症类型中表现出中等到强的诊断性能。结合NfL和GFAP的多标记模型的灵敏度和特异性均超过90%。由于研究设计和阈值的差异,S100B表现出不同的表现。cfDNA和代谢组学等新兴生物标志物显示出潜力,但需要进一步验证。结论:液体活检生物标志物,特别是NfL和GFAP,有望用于非侵入性脑脊膜炎检测。临床应用可能是在局部肿瘤的早期癌症检查中提示脑成像。未来的研究需要在不同癌症类型的更大、更多样化的人群中验证生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating liquid biopsy biomarkers for early detection of brain metastasis: A systematic review.

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are the most common intracranial malignancy in adults, contributing significantly to cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Early detection is critical for optimizing treatment and improving survival. This systematic review evaluates the diagnostic potential of liquid biopsy biomarkers for detecting BM from lung, breast, and other cancers.

Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and BIOSIS databases using keywords related to liquid biopsy, biomarkers, and BMs. Data on participant characteristics, diagnostic reference standards, types of biomarkers, primary cancer origins, and diagnostic outcomes were independently extracted. Diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Risk of bias was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool.

Results: Thirty-one studies involving 5676 participants were included, assessing biomarkers such as cfDNA, miRNAs, proteins (eg, neurofilament light [NfL], glial fibrillary acidic protein [GFAP], S100B), metabolomic profiles, and multi-marker models. NfL and GFAP emerged as the most promising biomarkers, demonstrating moderate to strong diagnostic performance across multiple cancer types. Multi-marker models combining NfL and GFAP achieved sensitivity and specificity exceeding 90%. S100B showed variable performance due to differences in study designs and thresholds. Emerging biomarkers like cfDNA and metabolomic profiles showed potential but require further validation.

Conclusions: Liquid biopsy biomarkers, particularly NfL and GFAP, hold promise for non-invasive BM detection. Clinical utility may be in the initial cancer workup for localized tumor to prompt brain imaging. Future research is required to validate biomarkers in larger, diverse populations across different cancer types.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信