脑膜瘤临床研究的核心结局集(COSMIC):国际患者和医疗保健专业人员对研究的共识。

IF 2.5 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neuro-oncology practice Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1093/nop/npaf023
Christopher P Millward, Terri S Armstrong, Sabrina Bell, Andrew R Brodbelt, Helen Bulbeck, Linda Dirven, Paul L Grundy, Abdurrahman I Islim, Mohsen Javadpour, Sumirat M Keshwara, Shelli D Koszdin, Anthony G Marson, Michael W McDermott, Torstein R Meling, Kathy Oliver, Puneet Plaha, Matthias Preusser, Thomas Santarius, Nisaharan Srikandarajah, Martin J B Taphoorn, Carole Turner, Colin Watts, Michael Weller, Paula R Williamson, Gelareh Zadeh, Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Michael D Jenkinson
{"title":"脑膜瘤临床研究的核心结局集(COSMIC):国际患者和医疗保健专业人员对研究的共识。","authors":"Christopher P Millward, Terri S Armstrong, Sabrina Bell, Andrew R Brodbelt, Helen Bulbeck, Linda Dirven, Paul L Grundy, Abdurrahman I Islim, Mohsen Javadpour, Sumirat M Keshwara, Shelli D Koszdin, Anthony G Marson, Michael W McDermott, Torstein R Meling, Kathy Oliver, Puneet Plaha, Matthias Preusser, Thomas Santarius, Nisaharan Srikandarajah, Martin J B Taphoorn, Carole Turner, Colin Watts, Michael Weller, Paula R Williamson, Gelareh Zadeh, Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Michael D Jenkinson","doi":"10.1093/nop/npaf023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core Outcome Sets (COS) define the minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific health condition or health area. The aim was to develop 2 COS for intracranial meningioma to be used in future clinical studies: COSMIC: Intervention for effectiveness trials and COSMIC: Observation for studies of incidental/untreated meningioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study advisory group was formed with representation from international stakeholder groups: EORTC BTG, ICOM, EANO, SNO, RANO-PRO, BNOS, SBNS, BIMS, TBTC, International Brain Tumour Alliance, and Brainstrust. Outcomes of potential relevance to key stakeholders were identified and rationalized to populate 2 eDelphi surveys. Participants were recruited internationally and asked to rate each outcome on its importance for inclusion in the COS. The 2 final COS were ratified through 2, one-day, online consensus meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COSMIC: Intervention eDelphi survey contained 25 items and was completed by 199 participants. Following the consensus meeting, 15 outcomes were included. The COSMIC: Observation eDelphi survey contained 17 items and was completed by 129 participants. Sixteen outcomes were included. Eight core outcomes were common to both COS; tumor growth, physical, emotional, and neurocognitive functioning, overall quality of life, progression-free survival, meningioma-specific mortality and overall survival. Role and social functioning were core outcomes in COSMIC: Observation but not COSMIC: Intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptake of these COS in relevant future meningioma clinical studies will ensure that stakeholder-determined, critically important outcomes are consistently measured and reported across similar clinical studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19234,"journal":{"name":"Neuro-oncology practice","volume":"12 4","pages":"700-713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349768/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core Outcome Sets for Meningioma In Clinical studies (COSMIC): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.\",\"authors\":\"Christopher P Millward, Terri S Armstrong, Sabrina Bell, Andrew R Brodbelt, Helen Bulbeck, Linda Dirven, Paul L Grundy, Abdurrahman I Islim, Mohsen Javadpour, Sumirat M Keshwara, Shelli D Koszdin, Anthony G Marson, Michael W McDermott, Torstein R Meling, Kathy Oliver, Puneet Plaha, Matthias Preusser, Thomas Santarius, Nisaharan Srikandarajah, Martin J B Taphoorn, Carole Turner, Colin Watts, Michael Weller, Paula R Williamson, Gelareh Zadeh, Amir H Zamanipoor Najafabadi, Michael D Jenkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/nop/npaf023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Core Outcome Sets (COS) define the minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific health condition or health area. The aim was to develop 2 COS for intracranial meningioma to be used in future clinical studies: COSMIC: Intervention for effectiveness trials and COSMIC: Observation for studies of incidental/untreated meningioma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A study advisory group was formed with representation from international stakeholder groups: EORTC BTG, ICOM, EANO, SNO, RANO-PRO, BNOS, SBNS, BIMS, TBTC, International Brain Tumour Alliance, and Brainstrust. Outcomes of potential relevance to key stakeholders were identified and rationalized to populate 2 eDelphi surveys. Participants were recruited internationally and asked to rate each outcome on its importance for inclusion in the COS. The 2 final COS were ratified through 2, one-day, online consensus meetings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The COSMIC: Intervention eDelphi survey contained 25 items and was completed by 199 participants. Following the consensus meeting, 15 outcomes were included. The COSMIC: Observation eDelphi survey contained 17 items and was completed by 129 participants. Sixteen outcomes were included. Eight core outcomes were common to both COS; tumor growth, physical, emotional, and neurocognitive functioning, overall quality of life, progression-free survival, meningioma-specific mortality and overall survival. Role and social functioning were core outcomes in COSMIC: Observation but not COSMIC: Intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Uptake of these COS in relevant future meningioma clinical studies will ensure that stakeholder-determined, critically important outcomes are consistently measured and reported across similar clinical studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"volume\":\"12 4\",\"pages\":\"700-713\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12349768/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neuro-oncology practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuro-oncology practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/nop/npaf023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:核心结局集(COS)定义了在特定健康状况或健康领域的所有临床试验中应测量和报告的最低结果。目的是开发颅内脑膜瘤的2个COS用于未来的临床研究:COSMIC:干预有效性试验和COSMIC:观察偶发/未经治疗的脑膜瘤的研究。方法:由国际利益相关团体EORTC BTG、ICOM、EANO、SNO、RANO-PRO、BNOS、SBNS、BIMS、TBTC、国际脑肿瘤联盟和braintrust代表组成研究咨询小组。确定了与关键利益相关者潜在相关的结果,并对其进行了合理化,以填充2次eDelphi调查。参与者是在国际上招募的,并被要求对每个结果的重要性进行评分,以纳入COS。2个最终的COS是通过2个为期一天的在线共识会议批准的。结果:COSMIC: Intervention eDelphi调查共包含25个项目,199名参与者完成。协商一致会议达成15项成果。COSMIC: Observation eDelphi调查包含17个项目,由129名参与者完成。纳入了16项结果。两种COS共有8项核心结局;肿瘤生长、身体、情绪和神经认知功能、总体生活质量、无进展生存期、脑膜瘤特异性死亡率和总体生存期。角色和社会功能是COSMIC:观察的核心结果,而不是COSMIC:干预。结论:在未来相关的脑膜瘤临床研究中使用这些COS将确保利益相关者确定的、至关重要的结果在类似的临床研究中得到一致的测量和报告。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Core Outcome Sets for Meningioma In Clinical studies (COSMIC): An international patient and healthcare professional consensus for research studies.

Background: Core Outcome Sets (COS) define the minimum outcomes that should be measured and reported in all clinical trials for a specific health condition or health area. The aim was to develop 2 COS for intracranial meningioma to be used in future clinical studies: COSMIC: Intervention for effectiveness trials and COSMIC: Observation for studies of incidental/untreated meningioma.

Methods: A study advisory group was formed with representation from international stakeholder groups: EORTC BTG, ICOM, EANO, SNO, RANO-PRO, BNOS, SBNS, BIMS, TBTC, International Brain Tumour Alliance, and Brainstrust. Outcomes of potential relevance to key stakeholders were identified and rationalized to populate 2 eDelphi surveys. Participants were recruited internationally and asked to rate each outcome on its importance for inclusion in the COS. The 2 final COS were ratified through 2, one-day, online consensus meetings.

Results: The COSMIC: Intervention eDelphi survey contained 25 items and was completed by 199 participants. Following the consensus meeting, 15 outcomes were included. The COSMIC: Observation eDelphi survey contained 17 items and was completed by 129 participants. Sixteen outcomes were included. Eight core outcomes were common to both COS; tumor growth, physical, emotional, and neurocognitive functioning, overall quality of life, progression-free survival, meningioma-specific mortality and overall survival. Role and social functioning were core outcomes in COSMIC: Observation but not COSMIC: Intervention.

Conclusions: Uptake of these COS in relevant future meningioma clinical studies will ensure that stakeholder-determined, critically important outcomes are consistently measured and reported across similar clinical studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neuro-oncology practice
Neuro-oncology practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
92
期刊介绍: Neuro-Oncology Practice focuses on the clinical aspects of the subspecialty for practicing clinicians and healthcare specialists from a variety of disciplines including physicians, nurses, physical/occupational therapists, neuropsychologists, and palliative care specialists, who have focused their careers on clinical patient care and who want to apply the latest treatment advances to their practice. These include: Applying new trial results to improve standards of patient care Translating scientific advances such as tumor molecular profiling and advanced imaging into clinical treatment decision making and personalized brain tumor therapies Raising awareness of basic, translational and clinical research in areas of symptom management, survivorship, neurocognitive function, end of life issues and caregiving
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信