Alice R. Kininmonth , Victoria L. Jenneson , Francesca Pontin , Jason C.G. Halford , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Michelle A. Morris , Alison Fildes , the DIO Food Team
{"title":"消费者对高脂、高糖、高盐食品(HFSS)法规的认识和认知及其对自我报告食品购买的影响","authors":"Alice R. Kininmonth , Victoria L. Jenneson , Francesca Pontin , Jason C.G. Halford , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Michelle A. Morris , Alison Fildes , the DIO Food Team","doi":"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102941","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 1968 adults, living in England, who were the primary shopper for the household completed online surveys, with oversampling of lower incomes (households earning less than £39,999 annually).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most purchased products from HFSS-dominated categories at least once/week (92.5 %). Shoppers with children or those living with food insecurity reported purchasing HFSS-dominated products more frequently and reported greater susceptibility to product placement and price-promotion strategies targeted by the current and planned HFSS legislation. The majority of shoppers surveyed were not aware of the HFSS legislation (58.7%), and most did not notice any changes to the shopping environment, either online (79.8%) or in-store (56.1%). Most felt the legislation was a good first step (71.4). However, 90% felt affordability of healthier food was as or more important than legislation of less healthy foods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While shoppers supported the legislation’s potential to encourage healthier food choices, they emphasised the importance of affordability. Households with children or those living with food insecurity are particularly susceptible to retail promotional strategies. To support these shoppers, future legislation should also consider promoting healthier foods to reduce dietary inequalities.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":321,"journal":{"name":"Food Policy","volume":"135 ","pages":"Article 102941"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing\",\"authors\":\"Alice R. Kininmonth , Victoria L. Jenneson , Francesca Pontin , Jason C.G. Halford , Alexandra M. Johnstone , Michelle A. Morris , Alison Fildes , the DIO Food Team\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodpol.2025.102941\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A sample of 1968 adults, living in England, who were the primary shopper for the household completed online surveys, with oversampling of lower incomes (households earning less than £39,999 annually).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Most purchased products from HFSS-dominated categories at least once/week (92.5 %). Shoppers with children or those living with food insecurity reported purchasing HFSS-dominated products more frequently and reported greater susceptibility to product placement and price-promotion strategies targeted by the current and planned HFSS legislation. The majority of shoppers surveyed were not aware of the HFSS legislation (58.7%), and most did not notice any changes to the shopping environment, either online (79.8%) or in-store (56.1%). Most felt the legislation was a good first step (71.4). However, 90% felt affordability of healthier food was as or more important than legislation of less healthy foods.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>While shoppers supported the legislation’s potential to encourage healthier food choices, they emphasised the importance of affordability. Households with children or those living with food insecurity are particularly susceptible to retail promotional strategies. To support these shoppers, future legislation should also consider promoting healthier foods to reduce dietary inequalities.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Policy\",\"volume\":\"135 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102941\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001460\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Policy","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306919225001460","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Customer awareness and perceptions of the high in fat, sugar, and salt (HFSS) placement legislation and impacts on self-reported food purchasing
Introduction
Legislation in England restricts the placement of high in fat, sugar or salt (HFSS) products in stores and online. This is the first study to investigate shoppers’ perceptions, and self-reported purchasing behaviours following its implementation.
Methods
A sample of 1968 adults, living in England, who were the primary shopper for the household completed online surveys, with oversampling of lower incomes (households earning less than £39,999 annually).
Results
Most purchased products from HFSS-dominated categories at least once/week (92.5 %). Shoppers with children or those living with food insecurity reported purchasing HFSS-dominated products more frequently and reported greater susceptibility to product placement and price-promotion strategies targeted by the current and planned HFSS legislation. The majority of shoppers surveyed were not aware of the HFSS legislation (58.7%), and most did not notice any changes to the shopping environment, either online (79.8%) or in-store (56.1%). Most felt the legislation was a good first step (71.4). However, 90% felt affordability of healthier food was as or more important than legislation of less healthy foods.
Conclusion
While shoppers supported the legislation’s potential to encourage healthier food choices, they emphasised the importance of affordability. Households with children or those living with food insecurity are particularly susceptible to retail promotional strategies. To support these shoppers, future legislation should also consider promoting healthier foods to reduce dietary inequalities.
期刊介绍:
Food Policy is a multidisciplinary journal publishing original research and novel evidence on issues in the formulation, implementation, and evaluation of policies for the food sector in developing, transition, and advanced economies.
Our main focus is on the economic and social aspect of food policy, and we prioritize empirical studies informing international food policy debates. Provided that articles make a clear and explicit contribution to food policy debates of international interest, we consider papers from any of the social sciences. Papers from other disciplines (e.g., law) will be considered only if they provide a key policy contribution, and are written in a style which is accessible to a social science readership.