腰椎管狭窄椎间突固定装置腰椎稳定。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurologia medico-chirurgica Pub Date : 2025-09-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-14 DOI:10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0314
Taisuke Yoshinaga, Kyongsong Kim, Takato Tajiri, Fumiaki Fujihara, Masanori Isobe, Hiroshi Abe, Toyohiko Isu
{"title":"腰椎管狭窄椎间突固定装置腰椎稳定。","authors":"Taisuke Yoshinaga, Kyongsong Kim, Takato Tajiri, Fumiaki Fujihara, Masanori Isobe, Hiroshi Abe, Toyohiko Isu","doi":"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study reports the treatment outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery and evaluates the radiological effects of the surgery at least 1 year post-surgery. Forty consecutive patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis underwent lumbar stabilization surgery using a titanium alloy interspinous spacer between August 2021 and October 2023. The cohort included 19 males and females, respectively, with a mean age of 75.2 years. The surgical level was L1 in 20 patients and L2 in 18 patients. Patients were operated using general anesthesia in 20 patients and local anesthesia in 18. We evaluated their surgical outcomes using the numerical rating scale for pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, before surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Radiological effects were also evaluated. All outcomes for the patient showed significant improvement at 6- and 12-months post-surgery. There was no significant change in the area of the dural sac before and after surgery; but the surgical level angle markedly decreased in both neutral and extended positions. Two patients underwent additional treatment post-surgery. This method does not require the removal of the lamina and yellow ligament, does not expose the nerves, and surgery can be performed without suspending antithrombotic drugs. It can also be performed under local anesthesia for patients at high risk for general anesthesia. However, general anesthesia is preferable as local anesthesia may lead to discomfort during surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":19225,"journal":{"name":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","volume":" ","pages":"413-419"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497514/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar Stabilization with Interspinous Process Devices for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.\",\"authors\":\"Taisuke Yoshinaga, Kyongsong Kim, Takato Tajiri, Fumiaki Fujihara, Masanori Isobe, Hiroshi Abe, Toyohiko Isu\",\"doi\":\"10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study reports the treatment outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery and evaluates the radiological effects of the surgery at least 1 year post-surgery. Forty consecutive patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis underwent lumbar stabilization surgery using a titanium alloy interspinous spacer between August 2021 and October 2023. The cohort included 19 males and females, respectively, with a mean age of 75.2 years. The surgical level was L1 in 20 patients and L2 in 18 patients. Patients were operated using general anesthesia in 20 patients and local anesthesia in 18. We evaluated their surgical outcomes using the numerical rating scale for pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, before surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Radiological effects were also evaluated. All outcomes for the patient showed significant improvement at 6- and 12-months post-surgery. There was no significant change in the area of the dural sac before and after surgery; but the surgical level angle markedly decreased in both neutral and extended positions. Two patients underwent additional treatment post-surgery. This method does not require the removal of the lamina and yellow ligament, does not expose the nerves, and surgery can be performed without suspending antithrombotic drugs. It can also be performed under local anesthesia for patients at high risk for general anesthesia. However, general anesthesia is preferable as local anesthesia may lead to discomfort during surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"413-419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12497514/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologia medico-chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0314\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/14 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologia medico-chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2176/jns-nmc.2024-0314","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究报道腰椎管狭窄患者行腰椎稳定手术的治疗结果,并评估手术后至少1年的放射学效果。在2021年8月至2023年10月期间,连续40例腰椎管狭窄患者使用钛合金棘间间隔器进行腰椎稳定手术。该队列包括男性和女性各19人,平均年龄75.2岁。20例手术水平为L1, 18例为L2。全麻20例,局麻18例。我们使用疼痛的数值评定量表、Roland-Morris残疾问卷和日本骨科协会评分,在手术前和术后6个月和12个月对他们的手术结果进行评估。放射效应也进行了评估。术后6个月和12个月患者的所有预后均有显著改善。手术前后硬膜囊面积无明显变化;但在中立位和伸展位,手术水平角均明显减小。2例患者术后接受了额外治疗。这种方法不需要切除椎板和黄韧带,不暴露神经,手术可以在不暂停抗血栓药物的情况下进行。对于全麻高危患者,也可在局麻下进行。然而,全身麻醉是可取的,因为局部麻醉可能导致手术过程中的不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Lumbar Stabilization with Interspinous Process Devices for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

Lumbar Stabilization with Interspinous Process Devices for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

Lumbar Stabilization with Interspinous Process Devices for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

Lumbar Stabilization with Interspinous Process Devices for Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis.

This study reports the treatment outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis who underwent lumbar stabilization surgery and evaluates the radiological effects of the surgery at least 1 year post-surgery. Forty consecutive patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis underwent lumbar stabilization surgery using a titanium alloy interspinous spacer between August 2021 and October 2023. The cohort included 19 males and females, respectively, with a mean age of 75.2 years. The surgical level was L1 in 20 patients and L2 in 18 patients. Patients were operated using general anesthesia in 20 patients and local anesthesia in 18. We evaluated their surgical outcomes using the numerical rating scale for pain, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Japanese Orthopedic Association scores, before surgery and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Radiological effects were also evaluated. All outcomes for the patient showed significant improvement at 6- and 12-months post-surgery. There was no significant change in the area of the dural sac before and after surgery; but the surgical level angle markedly decreased in both neutral and extended positions. Two patients underwent additional treatment post-surgery. This method does not require the removal of the lamina and yellow ligament, does not expose the nerves, and surgery can be performed without suspending antithrombotic drugs. It can also be performed under local anesthesia for patients at high risk for general anesthesia. However, general anesthesia is preferable as local anesthesia may lead to discomfort during surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologia medico-chirurgica
Neurologia medico-chirurgica 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Information not localized
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信