欺负受害者、自我同情和道德脱离中的同伴相互依赖:早期青少年的二元分析。

IF 3.6 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL
Shengping Xue, Aitao Lu, Kaixu Zhu, Wanyi Chen, Yang Xu, Lihong Ao, Jingui Chen
{"title":"欺负受害者、自我同情和道德脱离中的同伴相互依赖:早期青少年的二元分析。","authors":"Shengping Xue, Aitao Lu, Kaixu Zhu, Wanyi Chen, Yang Xu, Lihong Ao, Jingui Chen","doi":"10.1007/s10964-025-02238-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Moral disengagement plays a critical role in adolescents' social adjustment, and growing evidence suggests that peer characteristics may be linked to its development. However, limited research has explored how best friend's adverse experiences and emotion regulation strategies relate to adolescents' moral strategies. Bullying victimization and self-compassion, as salient adverse experiences and emotion regulation processes during adolescence, have been associated with moral disengagement, but the interpersonal patterns of these associations remain unclear. To address this gap, the present study applied the actor-partner interdependence model in a six-month longitudinal design to examine how adolescents' own (actor effects) and best friend's (partner effects) bullying victimization experiences and self-compassion were associated with their moral disengagement over time. The study sample included 105 same-gender friend dyads (120 boys; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.42, SD = 0.87) recruited from middle schools in Guangdong, China. Results showed that only adolescents' own bullying victimization, not that of their best friend, was significantly associated with their moral disengagement. Both adolescents' and their best friend's self-compassion were negatively associated with moral disengagement, with a relatively stronger actor effect (β = -0.191 vs. -0.113). These findings underscore the individual-specific nature of the link between bullying victimization and moral disengagement, while also highlighting the potential interpersonal relevance of best friend's self-compassion in adolescents' moral strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":17624,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer Interdependence in Bullying Victimization, Self-Compassion, and Moral Disengagement: A Dyadic Analysis of Early Adolescents.\",\"authors\":\"Shengping Xue, Aitao Lu, Kaixu Zhu, Wanyi Chen, Yang Xu, Lihong Ao, Jingui Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10964-025-02238-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Moral disengagement plays a critical role in adolescents' social adjustment, and growing evidence suggests that peer characteristics may be linked to its development. However, limited research has explored how best friend's adverse experiences and emotion regulation strategies relate to adolescents' moral strategies. Bullying victimization and self-compassion, as salient adverse experiences and emotion regulation processes during adolescence, have been associated with moral disengagement, but the interpersonal patterns of these associations remain unclear. To address this gap, the present study applied the actor-partner interdependence model in a six-month longitudinal design to examine how adolescents' own (actor effects) and best friend's (partner effects) bullying victimization experiences and self-compassion were associated with their moral disengagement over time. The study sample included 105 same-gender friend dyads (120 boys; M<sub>age</sub> = 13.42, SD = 0.87) recruited from middle schools in Guangdong, China. Results showed that only adolescents' own bullying victimization, not that of their best friend, was significantly associated with their moral disengagement. Both adolescents' and their best friend's self-compassion were negatively associated with moral disengagement, with a relatively stronger actor effect (β = -0.191 vs. -0.113). These findings underscore the individual-specific nature of the link between bullying victimization and moral disengagement, while also highlighting the potential interpersonal relevance of best friend's self-compassion in adolescents' moral strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17624,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Youth and Adolescence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02238-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Youth and Adolescence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-025-02238-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道德脱离在青少年的社会适应中起着至关重要的作用,越来越多的证据表明同伴特征可能与其发展有关。然而,关于最好的朋友的不良经历和情绪调节策略与青少年道德策略之间的关系的研究有限。欺凌受害和自我同情作为青少年时期显著的不良经历和情绪调节过程,与道德脱离相关,但这些关联的人际模式尚不清楚。为了解决这一差距,本研究在六个月的纵向设计中应用了行为者-伴侣相互依赖模型,以研究青少年自己(行为者效应)和最好的朋友(伴侣效应)的欺凌受害经历和自我同情是如何随着时间的推移与他们的道德脱离联系的。研究样本包括105对同性朋友(120名男孩;Mage = 13.42, SD = 0.87),从中国广东的中学中招募。结果表明,只有青少年自己的欺凌受害与他们的道德脱离显著相关,而不是他们最好的朋友的欺凌受害。青少年及其好友的自我同情与道德脱离均呈负相关,且行动者效应相对较强(β = -0.191 vs. -0.113)。这些发现强调了欺凌受害和道德脱离之间联系的个体特殊性,同时也强调了最好的朋友的自我同情在青少年道德策略中的潜在人际相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer Interdependence in Bullying Victimization, Self-Compassion, and Moral Disengagement: A Dyadic Analysis of Early Adolescents.

Moral disengagement plays a critical role in adolescents' social adjustment, and growing evidence suggests that peer characteristics may be linked to its development. However, limited research has explored how best friend's adverse experiences and emotion regulation strategies relate to adolescents' moral strategies. Bullying victimization and self-compassion, as salient adverse experiences and emotion regulation processes during adolescence, have been associated with moral disengagement, but the interpersonal patterns of these associations remain unclear. To address this gap, the present study applied the actor-partner interdependence model in a six-month longitudinal design to examine how adolescents' own (actor effects) and best friend's (partner effects) bullying victimization experiences and self-compassion were associated with their moral disengagement over time. The study sample included 105 same-gender friend dyads (120 boys; Mage = 13.42, SD = 0.87) recruited from middle schools in Guangdong, China. Results showed that only adolescents' own bullying victimization, not that of their best friend, was significantly associated with their moral disengagement. Both adolescents' and their best friend's self-compassion were negatively associated with moral disengagement, with a relatively stronger actor effect (β = -0.191 vs. -0.113). These findings underscore the individual-specific nature of the link between bullying victimization and moral disengagement, while also highlighting the potential interpersonal relevance of best friend's self-compassion in adolescents' moral strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Youth and Adolescence
Journal of Youth and Adolescence PSYCHOLOGY, DEVELOPMENTAL-
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
6.10%
发文量
155
期刊介绍: Journal of Youth and Adolescence provides a single, high-level medium of communication for psychologists, psychiatrists, biologists, criminologists, educators, and researchers in many other allied disciplines who address the subject of youth and adolescence. The journal publishes quantitative analyses, theoretical papers, and comprehensive review articles. The journal especially welcomes empirically rigorous papers that take policy implications seriously. Research need not have been designed to address policy needs, but manuscripts must address implications for the manner society formally (e.g., through laws, policies or regulations) or informally (e.g., through parents, peers, and social institutions) responds to the period of youth and adolescence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信