老年人护理网络和未满足需求的途径。

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Innovation in Aging Pub Date : 2025-08-10 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/geroni/igaf063
Jyoti Savla, Zhe Wang
{"title":"老年人护理网络和未满足需求的途径。","authors":"Jyoti Savla, Zhe Wang","doi":"10.1093/geroni/igaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults differ widely both in the care they require and in who provides them care, often reporting significant unmet needs for assistance. Few studies have simultaneously considered the type of disability (self-care, mobility, and household activities) and multisource care networks (kin, extended-kin, non-kin, and paid help) to understand factors influencing unmet care needs among community-living older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011; <i>N</i> = 3,265; <i>M</i> <sub>Age</sub> [<i>SD</i>] = 77 [7.74] years, 62% women), we conducted a latent class analysis to identify care network types based on older adults' functional limitations and caregiver sources. Multinomial logistic regression models predicted network membership based on personal and structural predictors. Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship between network type and unmet care needs 1 year later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven distinct care network types emerged, characterized by combinations of caregiving sources and disability domains. Kin caregivers were involved across all network types. Older adults coresiding with kin typically received minimal paid help, which significantly increased their likelihood of unmet care needs in the subsequent year. Networks predominantly relying on non-kin caregivers tended to not use paid services and exhibited higher unmet care needs. Mismatches between disability type and the assistance received (e.g., requiring self-care assistance but primarily receiving household help) were associated with unmet care needs in the subsequent year.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The provision of adequate care was contingent upon the direct alignment of caregiving tasks with the functional limitations of aging adults and the effective coordination of informal and formal care resources. Enhancing care alignment through targeted assessments, supplementing family caregiving with formal services, and promoting coordinated caregiving arrangements could substantially reduce unmet care needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13596,"journal":{"name":"Innovation in Aging","volume":"9 7","pages":"igaf063"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older adults' care networks and the pathways to unmet needs.\",\"authors\":\"Jyoti Savla, Zhe Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/geroni/igaf063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Older adults differ widely both in the care they require and in who provides them care, often reporting significant unmet needs for assistance. Few studies have simultaneously considered the type of disability (self-care, mobility, and household activities) and multisource care networks (kin, extended-kin, non-kin, and paid help) to understand factors influencing unmet care needs among community-living older adults.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011; <i>N</i> = 3,265; <i>M</i> <sub>Age</sub> [<i>SD</i>] = 77 [7.74] years, 62% women), we conducted a latent class analysis to identify care network types based on older adults' functional limitations and caregiver sources. Multinomial logistic regression models predicted network membership based on personal and structural predictors. Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship between network type and unmet care needs 1 year later.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven distinct care network types emerged, characterized by combinations of caregiving sources and disability domains. Kin caregivers were involved across all network types. Older adults coresiding with kin typically received minimal paid help, which significantly increased their likelihood of unmet care needs in the subsequent year. Networks predominantly relying on non-kin caregivers tended to not use paid services and exhibited higher unmet care needs. Mismatches between disability type and the assistance received (e.g., requiring self-care assistance but primarily receiving household help) were associated with unmet care needs in the subsequent year.</p><p><strong>Discussion and implications: </strong>The provision of adequate care was contingent upon the direct alignment of caregiving tasks with the functional limitations of aging adults and the effective coordination of informal and formal care resources. Enhancing care alignment through targeted assessments, supplementing family caregiving with formal services, and promoting coordinated caregiving arrangements could substantially reduce unmet care needs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13596,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"volume\":\"9 7\",\"pages\":\"igaf063\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12342885/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Innovation in Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf063\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovation in Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaf063","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:老年人在他们需要的护理和谁为他们提供护理方面差异很大,通常报告有大量未满足的援助需求。很少有研究同时考虑残疾类型(自我护理、流动性和家庭活动)和多来源护理网络(亲属、延伸亲属、非亲属和有偿帮助),以了解影响社区生活老年人未满足护理需求的因素。研究设计与方法:采用2011年国家健康与老龄化趋势研究的数据;n = 3265;年龄[SD] = 77[7.74]岁,62%为女性),我们进行了潜在分类分析,以识别基于老年人功能限制和照顾者来源的护理网络类型。多项逻辑回归模型基于个人和结构预测因子预测网络成员。零膨胀泊松回归检验了1年后网络类型与未满足的护理需求之间的关系。结果:出现了七种不同的护理网络类型,其特征是护理来源和残疾领域的结合。亲属照顾者参与了所有网络类型。与亲属同住的老年人通常只得到最低限度的有偿帮助,这大大增加了他们在随后一年未得到满足的护理需求的可能性。主要依赖非亲属照顾者的网络倾向于不使用付费服务,并表现出更高的未满足护理需求。残疾类型与获得的援助(例如,需要自我照顾援助,但主要接受家庭帮助)之间的不匹配与随后一年的护理需求未得到满足有关。讨论和启示:提供足够的护理取决于护理任务与老年人功能限制的直接对齐以及非正式和正式护理资源的有效协调。通过有针对性的评估加强护理协调,以正式服务补充家庭护理,并促进协调的护理安排,可大大减少未得到满足的护理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Older adults' care networks and the pathways to unmet needs.

Background and objectives: Older adults differ widely both in the care they require and in who provides them care, often reporting significant unmet needs for assistance. Few studies have simultaneously considered the type of disability (self-care, mobility, and household activities) and multisource care networks (kin, extended-kin, non-kin, and paid help) to understand factors influencing unmet care needs among community-living older adults.

Research design and methods: Using data from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011; N = 3,265; M Age [SD] = 77 [7.74] years, 62% women), we conducted a latent class analysis to identify care network types based on older adults' functional limitations and caregiver sources. Multinomial logistic regression models predicted network membership based on personal and structural predictors. Zero-inflated Poisson regression examined the relationship between network type and unmet care needs 1 year later.

Results: Seven distinct care network types emerged, characterized by combinations of caregiving sources and disability domains. Kin caregivers were involved across all network types. Older adults coresiding with kin typically received minimal paid help, which significantly increased their likelihood of unmet care needs in the subsequent year. Networks predominantly relying on non-kin caregivers tended to not use paid services and exhibited higher unmet care needs. Mismatches between disability type and the assistance received (e.g., requiring self-care assistance but primarily receiving household help) were associated with unmet care needs in the subsequent year.

Discussion and implications: The provision of adequate care was contingent upon the direct alignment of caregiving tasks with the functional limitations of aging adults and the effective coordination of informal and formal care resources. Enhancing care alignment through targeted assessments, supplementing family caregiving with formal services, and promoting coordinated caregiving arrangements could substantially reduce unmet care needs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Innovation in Aging
Innovation in Aging GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Innovation in Aging, an interdisciplinary Open Access journal of the Gerontological Society of America (GSA), is dedicated to publishing innovative, conceptually robust, and methodologically rigorous research focused on aging and the life course. The journal aims to present studies with the potential to significantly enhance the health, functionality, and overall well-being of older adults by translating scientific insights into practical applications. Research published in the journal spans a variety of settings, including community, clinical, and laboratory contexts, with a clear emphasis on issues that are directly pertinent to aging and the dynamics of life over time. The content of the journal mirrors the diverse research interests of GSA members and encompasses a range of study types. These include the validation of new conceptual or theoretical models, assessments of factors impacting the health and well-being of older adults, evaluations of interventions and policies, the implementation of groundbreaking research methodologies, interdisciplinary research that adapts concepts and methods from other fields to aging studies, and the use of modeling and simulations to understand factors and processes influencing aging outcomes. The journal welcomes contributions from scholars across various disciplines, such as technology, engineering, architecture, economics, business, law, political science, public policy, education, public health, social and psychological sciences, biomedical and health sciences, and the humanities and arts, reflecting a holistic approach to advancing knowledge in gerontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信