Thanh Le Thai Van, Thong Nguyen Tri, Hung Ta Quoc, Tuan Ngo Anh, Yen Thai Thanh, Thao Nguyen Phuong, Anh Le Vi, Nam Tran Ngoc Khanh, Vy Tran Hanh
{"title":"利多卡因浓度对皮肤渗透麻醉镇痛效果及不良事件的影响。","authors":"Thanh Le Thai Van, Thong Nguyen Tri, Hung Ta Quoc, Tuan Ngo Anh, Yen Thai Thanh, Thao Nguyen Phuong, Anh Le Vi, Nam Tran Ngoc Khanh, Vy Tran Hanh","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1503a5382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infiltrative anesthesia with lidocaine plays a vital role in pain management during dermatological procedures, ensuring patient comfort throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the correlation between three different concentrations of lidocaine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:6) used in infiltrative anesthesia and their analgesic efficacy and adverse effects in dermatological procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a randomized design, with 240 patients assigned to receive varying concentrations of lidocaine with epinephrine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, or 1:6) during seven common dermatological procedures: punch biopsy, excisional biopsy, CO2 laser biopsy, surgical excision, CO2 laser excision, fractional CO2 laser treatment, and filler injection. Total lidocaine dosage and patient comfort assessments were recorded for each participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three lidocaine concentrations demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy during the procedures, as measured by visual analog scale scores. The 1:6 dilution group required a significantly lower lidocaine dose, with a 39.3% reduction compared to the 1:4 dilution group and a 75.3% reduction compared to the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001). The 1:6 dilution group experienced significantly less pain during injection than that of the 1:4 dilution group and the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine at dilutions ranging from 1:2 to 1:6 for infiltrative anesthesia in dermatological procedures provided similar analgesic efficacy. Importantly, the 1:6 dilution significantly reduced both injection pain and total lidocaine dosage. More studies are required to confirm our results.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339134/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Lidocaine Concentration on Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Events in Dermatologic Infiltrative Anesthesia.\",\"authors\":\"Thanh Le Thai Van, Thong Nguyen Tri, Hung Ta Quoc, Tuan Ngo Anh, Yen Thai Thanh, Thao Nguyen Phuong, Anh Le Vi, Nam Tran Ngoc Khanh, Vy Tran Hanh\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/dpc.1503a5382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Infiltrative anesthesia with lidocaine plays a vital role in pain management during dermatological procedures, ensuring patient comfort throughout the process.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the correlation between three different concentrations of lidocaine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:6) used in infiltrative anesthesia and their analgesic efficacy and adverse effects in dermatological procedures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study employed a randomized design, with 240 patients assigned to receive varying concentrations of lidocaine with epinephrine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, or 1:6) during seven common dermatological procedures: punch biopsy, excisional biopsy, CO2 laser biopsy, surgical excision, CO2 laser excision, fractional CO2 laser treatment, and filler injection. Total lidocaine dosage and patient comfort assessments were recorded for each participant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All three lidocaine concentrations demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy during the procedures, as measured by visual analog scale scores. The 1:6 dilution group required a significantly lower lidocaine dose, with a 39.3% reduction compared to the 1:4 dilution group and a 75.3% reduction compared to the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001). The 1:6 dilution group experienced significantly less pain during injection than that of the 1:4 dilution group and the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine at dilutions ranging from 1:2 to 1:6 for infiltrative anesthesia in dermatological procedures provided similar analgesic efficacy. Importantly, the 1:6 dilution significantly reduced both injection pain and total lidocaine dosage. More studies are required to confirm our results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339134/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5382\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Lidocaine Concentration on Analgesic Efficacy and Adverse Events in Dermatologic Infiltrative Anesthesia.
Introduction: Infiltrative anesthesia with lidocaine plays a vital role in pain management during dermatological procedures, ensuring patient comfort throughout the process.
Objective: We aimed to investigate the correlation between three different concentrations of lidocaine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, and 1:6) used in infiltrative anesthesia and their analgesic efficacy and adverse effects in dermatological procedures.
Methods: This study employed a randomized design, with 240 patients assigned to receive varying concentrations of lidocaine with epinephrine (2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine diluted at ratios of 1:2, 1:4, or 1:6) during seven common dermatological procedures: punch biopsy, excisional biopsy, CO2 laser biopsy, surgical excision, CO2 laser excision, fractional CO2 laser treatment, and filler injection. Total lidocaine dosage and patient comfort assessments were recorded for each participant.
Results: All three lidocaine concentrations demonstrated comparable analgesic efficacy during the procedures, as measured by visual analog scale scores. The 1:6 dilution group required a significantly lower lidocaine dose, with a 39.3% reduction compared to the 1:4 dilution group and a 75.3% reduction compared to the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001). The 1:6 dilution group experienced significantly less pain during injection than that of the 1:4 dilution group and the 1:2 dilution group (P<0.001).
Conclusion: Lidocaine 2% with 1:100,000 epinephrine at dilutions ranging from 1:2 to 1:6 for infiltrative anesthesia in dermatological procedures provided similar analgesic efficacy. Importantly, the 1:6 dilution significantly reduced both injection pain and total lidocaine dosage. More studies are required to confirm our results.