国际皮肤镜学会成员的皮肤镜图像数字后处理感知和使用:一项基于网络的调查结果。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Marian Voloshynovych, Paweł Pietkiewicz, Cristián Navarette-Dechent, Aimilios Lallas, John Paoli, Harald Kittler, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Mohamad Goldust, Jacek C Szepietowski, Iris Zalaudek, Thomas M Beachkofsky, Caterina Longo, Cliff Rosendahl, Norbert Kiss, Giuseppe Argenziano, Mohammad Jafferany, Agnieszka Leszczyńska-Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Nataliia Matkovska
{"title":"国际皮肤镜学会成员的皮肤镜图像数字后处理感知和使用:一项基于网络的调查结果。","authors":"Marian Voloshynovych, Paweł Pietkiewicz, Cristián Navarette-Dechent, Aimilios Lallas, John Paoli, Harald Kittler, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Mohamad Goldust, Jacek C Szepietowski, Iris Zalaudek, Thomas M Beachkofsky, Caterina Longo, Cliff Rosendahl, Norbert Kiss, Giuseppe Argenziano, Mohammad Jafferany, Agnieszka Leszczyńska-Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Nataliia Matkovska","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1503a5366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Speculatively, digital image post-processing (DIPP) enhances diagnostic accuracy in dermoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the advantages and limitations of DIPP, as well as its perceived reliability and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study we investigated the perception and use of DIPP among members of the International Dermoscopy Society through a web-based survey with 17 questions focusing on: (i) demographics (sex, age, nationality, specialty, professional experience in dermoscopy), (ii) application of digital dermoscopy, (iii) imaging devices, (iv) DIPP software usage, (v) area of DIPP application (e.g., neoplastic dermatoses or inflammoscopy), preference over manual or automatized DIPP, (vi) personally adjusted parameters, (vii) perceived reliability and safety of DIPP, and (viii) an open comment section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 360 respondents (64 countries) completed the survey. While 91.7% of respondents reported capturing dermoscopic images during examination, only 22.4% of them declared using DIPP. We have demonstrated that DIPP was used more commonly with smartphones rather than video dermatoscopes or digital cameras and for dermoscopy of neoplastic dermatoses rather than inflammoscopy. Respondents tended to adjust image parameters manually. The perceptions of its usefulness and safety were good, even though slight variability across geographic regions was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given that no regulations for DIPP exist, healthcare professionals involved with dermoscopic image acquisition and archiving may require special training to responsibly implement DIPP in their practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339135/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dermoscopic Image Digital Post-Processing Perception and Use Among Members of the International Dermoscopy Society: Results of a Web-based Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Marian Voloshynovych, Paweł Pietkiewicz, Cristián Navarette-Dechent, Aimilios Lallas, John Paoli, Harald Kittler, Ashfaq A Marghoob, Mohamad Goldust, Jacek C Szepietowski, Iris Zalaudek, Thomas M Beachkofsky, Caterina Longo, Cliff Rosendahl, Norbert Kiss, Giuseppe Argenziano, Mohammad Jafferany, Agnieszka Leszczyńska-Pietkiewicz, Natalia Salwowska, Nataliia Matkovska\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/dpc.1503a5366\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Speculatively, digital image post-processing (DIPP) enhances diagnostic accuracy in dermoscopy.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to investigate the advantages and limitations of DIPP, as well as its perceived reliability and safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study we investigated the perception and use of DIPP among members of the International Dermoscopy Society through a web-based survey with 17 questions focusing on: (i) demographics (sex, age, nationality, specialty, professional experience in dermoscopy), (ii) application of digital dermoscopy, (iii) imaging devices, (iv) DIPP software usage, (v) area of DIPP application (e.g., neoplastic dermatoses or inflammoscopy), preference over manual or automatized DIPP, (vi) personally adjusted parameters, (vii) perceived reliability and safety of DIPP, and (viii) an open comment section.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 360 respondents (64 countries) completed the survey. While 91.7% of respondents reported capturing dermoscopic images during examination, only 22.4% of them declared using DIPP. We have demonstrated that DIPP was used more commonly with smartphones rather than video dermatoscopes or digital cameras and for dermoscopy of neoplastic dermatoses rather than inflammoscopy. Respondents tended to adjust image parameters manually. The perceptions of its usefulness and safety were good, even though slight variability across geographic regions was observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Given that no regulations for DIPP exist, healthcare professionals involved with dermoscopic image acquisition and archiving may require special training to responsibly implement DIPP in their practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339135/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5366\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5366","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从理论上讲,数字图像后处理(DIPP)提高了皮肤镜检查的诊断准确性。目的:探讨DIPP的优点和局限性,以及其可靠性和安全性。方法:在本研究中,我们通过网络调查调查了国际皮肤镜学会成员对DIPP的认知和使用,共17个问题,重点是:(i)人口统计(性别、年龄、国籍、专业、皮肤镜检查的专业经验),(ii)数字皮肤镜检查的应用,(iii)成像设备,(iv) DIPP软件的使用,(v) DIPP应用的领域(例如,肿瘤性皮肤病或炎症镜检查),对手动或自动DIPP的偏好,(vi)个人调整参数,(vii)感知到的DIPP的可靠性和安全性,以及(viii)开放评论部分。结果:共有360名受访者(64个国家)完成了调查。91.7%的受访者表示在检查过程中捕获了皮肤镜图像,而只有22.4%的受访者表示使用了DIPP。我们已经证明,DIPP更常用于智能手机,而不是视频皮镜或数码相机,用于肿瘤性皮肤病的皮镜检查,而不是炎症检查。受访者倾向于手动调整图像参数。对其有用性和安全性的看法是好的,尽管在地理区域之间观察到轻微的差异。结论:由于没有DIPP的相关规定,参与皮肤镜图像采集和存档的医疗保健专业人员可能需要接受特殊培训,以便在实践中负责任地实施DIPP。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dermoscopic Image Digital Post-Processing Perception and Use Among Members of the International Dermoscopy Society: Results of a Web-based Survey.

Introduction: Speculatively, digital image post-processing (DIPP) enhances diagnostic accuracy in dermoscopy.

Objective: We aimed to investigate the advantages and limitations of DIPP, as well as its perceived reliability and safety.

Methods: In this study we investigated the perception and use of DIPP among members of the International Dermoscopy Society through a web-based survey with 17 questions focusing on: (i) demographics (sex, age, nationality, specialty, professional experience in dermoscopy), (ii) application of digital dermoscopy, (iii) imaging devices, (iv) DIPP software usage, (v) area of DIPP application (e.g., neoplastic dermatoses or inflammoscopy), preference over manual or automatized DIPP, (vi) personally adjusted parameters, (vii) perceived reliability and safety of DIPP, and (viii) an open comment section.

Results: A total of 360 respondents (64 countries) completed the survey. While 91.7% of respondents reported capturing dermoscopic images during examination, only 22.4% of them declared using DIPP. We have demonstrated that DIPP was used more commonly with smartphones rather than video dermatoscopes or digital cameras and for dermoscopy of neoplastic dermatoses rather than inflammoscopy. Respondents tended to adjust image parameters manually. The perceptions of its usefulness and safety were good, even though slight variability across geographic regions was observed.

Conclusion: Given that no regulations for DIPP exist, healthcare professionals involved with dermoscopic image acquisition and archiving may require special training to responsibly implement DIPP in their practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信