面部皮肤病患者的感知压力、压力应对策略与身体形象。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Hazel Ezgi Kaya, İlknur Kıvanç Altunay, Aslı Aksu
{"title":"面部皮肤病患者的感知压力、压力应对策略与身体形象。","authors":"Hazel Ezgi Kaya, İlknur Kıvanç Altunay, Aslı Aksu","doi":"10.5826/dpc.1503a5054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering its visible nature, facial dermatosis may result in more prominent psychosocial effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, stress coping strategies, and body image in individuals with facial and trunk dermatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 with facial dermatosis, 60 with trunk dermatosis) and 60 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Demographic and clinical features were recorded, and participants were evaluated with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Stress Coping Attitudes Inventory (SCAI), and Body Image Scale (BIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In trunk dermatosis patient group, the DLQI, HADS, and PSS scores were significantly higher, while the BIS scores were significantly lower than in the facial dermatosis group and the controls. Avoidance subscores of the SCAI were significantly higher in the trunk dermatosis group compared to the facial dermatosis group. Acceptance/Cognitive Restructuring subscore of the SCAI was found to be higher in the facial dermatosis than the trunk dermatosis group (P=0.037). Linear regression analysis revealed that the most important determinant of DLQI was HADS-Anxiety score (β=0.271, P=0.023) and one of the most important determinant of the PSS score was HADS-Anxiety score (β= 0.426, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with trunk dermatosis experienced more stress, anxiety, depression, and distortion of body perception, and the impact on quality of life was more pronounced. This situation was thought to be related to the fact that patients with facial dermatosis used positive coping strategies, while negative strategies were more common in patients with trunk dermatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":11168,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339105/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceived Stress, Stress Coping Strategies, and Body Image Among Facial Dermatosis.\",\"authors\":\"Hazel Ezgi Kaya, İlknur Kıvanç Altunay, Aslı Aksu\",\"doi\":\"10.5826/dpc.1503a5054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Considering its visible nature, facial dermatosis may result in more prominent psychosocial effects.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to compare quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, stress coping strategies, and body image in individuals with facial and trunk dermatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 120 patients (60 with facial dermatosis, 60 with trunk dermatosis) and 60 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Demographic and clinical features were recorded, and participants were evaluated with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Stress Coping Attitudes Inventory (SCAI), and Body Image Scale (BIS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In trunk dermatosis patient group, the DLQI, HADS, and PSS scores were significantly higher, while the BIS scores were significantly lower than in the facial dermatosis group and the controls. Avoidance subscores of the SCAI were significantly higher in the trunk dermatosis group compared to the facial dermatosis group. Acceptance/Cognitive Restructuring subscore of the SCAI was found to be higher in the facial dermatosis than the trunk dermatosis group (P=0.037). Linear regression analysis revealed that the most important determinant of DLQI was HADS-Anxiety score (β=0.271, P=0.023) and one of the most important determinant of the PSS score was HADS-Anxiety score (β= 0.426, P<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with trunk dermatosis experienced more stress, anxiety, depression, and distortion of body perception, and the impact on quality of life was more pronounced. This situation was thought to be related to the fact that patients with facial dermatosis used positive coping strategies, while negative strategies were more common in patients with trunk dermatosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12339105/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology practical & conceptual\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5054\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology practical & conceptual","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5826/dpc.1503a5054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其可见性,面部皮肤病可能导致更突出的社会心理影响。目的:我们旨在比较面部和躯干皮肤病患者的生活质量、焦虑、抑郁、感知压力、压力应对策略和身体形象。方法:选取面部皮肤病患者60例,躯干皮肤病患者60例,健康志愿者60例。记录人口统计学和临床特征,并使用皮肤病生活质量指数(DLQI)、医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)、感知压力量表(PSS)、压力应对态度量表(SCAI)和身体形象量表(BIS)对参与者进行评估。结果:躯干皮肤病患者组DLQI、HADS、PSS评分显著高于面部皮肤病组和对照组,BIS评分显著低于面部皮肤病组和对照组。躯干皮肤病组SCAI回避评分明显高于面部皮肤病组。面部皮肤病组SCAI接受/认知重构评分高于躯干皮肤病组(P=0.037)。线性回归分析显示,影响患者DLQI的最重要因素是HADS-Anxiety评分(β=0.271, P=0.023),影响PSS评分的最重要因素之一是HADS-Anxiety评分(β= 0.426, P)。结论:躯干皮肤病患者的压力、焦虑、抑郁和身体感知扭曲程度更高,对生活质量的影响更明显。这种情况被认为与面部皮肤病患者采用积极应对策略有关,而躯干皮肤病患者采用消极应对策略更为常见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceived Stress, Stress Coping Strategies, and Body Image Among Facial Dermatosis.

Introduction: Considering its visible nature, facial dermatosis may result in more prominent psychosocial effects.

Objectives: We aimed to compare quality of life, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, stress coping strategies, and body image in individuals with facial and trunk dermatosis.

Methods: A total of 120 patients (60 with facial dermatosis, 60 with trunk dermatosis) and 60 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Demographic and clinical features were recorded, and participants were evaluated with Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), Stress Coping Attitudes Inventory (SCAI), and Body Image Scale (BIS).

Results: In trunk dermatosis patient group, the DLQI, HADS, and PSS scores were significantly higher, while the BIS scores were significantly lower than in the facial dermatosis group and the controls. Avoidance subscores of the SCAI were significantly higher in the trunk dermatosis group compared to the facial dermatosis group. Acceptance/Cognitive Restructuring subscore of the SCAI was found to be higher in the facial dermatosis than the trunk dermatosis group (P=0.037). Linear regression analysis revealed that the most important determinant of DLQI was HADS-Anxiety score (β=0.271, P=0.023) and one of the most important determinant of the PSS score was HADS-Anxiety score (β= 0.426, P<0.001).

Conclusion: Patients with trunk dermatosis experienced more stress, anxiety, depression, and distortion of body perception, and the impact on quality of life was more pronounced. This situation was thought to be related to the fact that patients with facial dermatosis used positive coping strategies, while negative strategies were more common in patients with trunk dermatosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信