时域光子多普勒测速分析的贝叶斯方法。

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION
J R Allison, R Bordas, J Read, G Burdiak, V Beltrán, N Joiner, H Doyle, N Hawker, J Skidmore, T Ao, A Porwitzky, D Dolan, B Farfan, C Johnson, A Hansen
{"title":"时域光子多普勒测速分析的贝叶斯方法。","authors":"J R Allison, R Bordas, J Read, G Burdiak, V Beltrán, N Joiner, H Doyle, N Hawker, J Skidmore, T Ao, A Porwitzky, D Dolan, B Farfan, C Johnson, A Hansen","doi":"10.1063/5.0267409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV) is an established technique for measuring the velocities of fast-moving surfaces in high-energy-density experiments. In the standard approach to PDV analysis, the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is used to generate a spectrogram from which the velocity history of the target is inferred. The user chooses the form, duration, and separation of the window function. Here, we present a Bayesian approach to infer the velocity directly from the PDV oscilloscope trace, without using the spectrogram for analysis. This is clearly a difficult inference problem due to the highly periodic nature of the data, but we find that with carefully chosen prior distributions for the model parameters, we can accurately recover the injected velocity from synthetic data. We validate this method using PDV data collected at the STAR two-stage light gas gun at Sandia National Laboratories, recovering shock-front velocities in quartz that are consistent with those inferred using the STFT-based approach and are interpolated across regions of low signal-to-noise data. Although this method does not rely on the same user choices as the STFT, we caution that it can be prone to misspecification if the chosen model is not sufficient to capture the velocity behavior. Analysis using posterior predictive checks can be used to establish whether a better model is required, although more complex models come with additional computational cost, often taking more than several hours to converge when sampling the Bayesian posterior. We, therefore, recommend it be viewed as a complementary method to that of the STFT-based approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":21111,"journal":{"name":"Review of Scientific Instruments","volume":"96 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Bayesian approach to time-domain photonic Doppler velocimetry analysis.\",\"authors\":\"J R Allison, R Bordas, J Read, G Burdiak, V Beltrán, N Joiner, H Doyle, N Hawker, J Skidmore, T Ao, A Porwitzky, D Dolan, B Farfan, C Johnson, A Hansen\",\"doi\":\"10.1063/5.0267409\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV) is an established technique for measuring the velocities of fast-moving surfaces in high-energy-density experiments. In the standard approach to PDV analysis, the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is used to generate a spectrogram from which the velocity history of the target is inferred. The user chooses the form, duration, and separation of the window function. Here, we present a Bayesian approach to infer the velocity directly from the PDV oscilloscope trace, without using the spectrogram for analysis. This is clearly a difficult inference problem due to the highly periodic nature of the data, but we find that with carefully chosen prior distributions for the model parameters, we can accurately recover the injected velocity from synthetic data. We validate this method using PDV data collected at the STAR two-stage light gas gun at Sandia National Laboratories, recovering shock-front velocities in quartz that are consistent with those inferred using the STFT-based approach and are interpolated across regions of low signal-to-noise data. Although this method does not rely on the same user choices as the STFT, we caution that it can be prone to misspecification if the chosen model is not sufficient to capture the velocity behavior. Analysis using posterior predictive checks can be used to establish whether a better model is required, although more complex models come with additional computational cost, often taking more than several hours to converge when sampling the Bayesian posterior. We, therefore, recommend it be viewed as a complementary method to that of the STFT-based approach.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Scientific Instruments\",\"volume\":\"96 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Scientific Instruments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0267409\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Scientific Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0267409","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

光子多普勒测速技术(PDV)是一种在高能量密度实验中测量快速运动表面速度的成熟技术。在PDV分析的标准方法中,短时傅里叶变换(STFT)用于生成频谱图,从中推断目标的速度历史。用户选择窗口函数的形式、持续时间和间隔。在这里,我们提出了一种贝叶斯方法来直接从PDV示波器轨迹推断速度,而不使用频谱图进行分析。由于数据的高度周期性,这显然是一个困难的推理问题,但我们发现,通过仔细选择模型参数的先验分布,我们可以准确地从合成数据中恢复注入速度。我们使用桑迪亚国家实验室STAR两级光气枪收集的PDV数据验证了该方法,恢复了石英中的冲击前速度,这些速度与使用基于stft的方法推断的速度一致,并在低信噪比数据区域进行了插值。虽然这种方法不依赖于与STFT相同的用户选择,但我们警告说,如果选择的模型不足以捕获速度行为,它可能容易出现错误说明。使用后验预测检查的分析可以用来确定是否需要一个更好的模型,尽管更复杂的模型需要额外的计算成本,通常需要几个小时才能在贝叶斯后验抽样时收敛。因此,我们建议将其视为基于stft方法的补充方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Bayesian approach to time-domain photonic Doppler velocimetry analysis.

Photonic Doppler velocimetry (PDV) is an established technique for measuring the velocities of fast-moving surfaces in high-energy-density experiments. In the standard approach to PDV analysis, the short-time Fourier transform (STFT) is used to generate a spectrogram from which the velocity history of the target is inferred. The user chooses the form, duration, and separation of the window function. Here, we present a Bayesian approach to infer the velocity directly from the PDV oscilloscope trace, without using the spectrogram for analysis. This is clearly a difficult inference problem due to the highly periodic nature of the data, but we find that with carefully chosen prior distributions for the model parameters, we can accurately recover the injected velocity from synthetic data. We validate this method using PDV data collected at the STAR two-stage light gas gun at Sandia National Laboratories, recovering shock-front velocities in quartz that are consistent with those inferred using the STFT-based approach and are interpolated across regions of low signal-to-noise data. Although this method does not rely on the same user choices as the STFT, we caution that it can be prone to misspecification if the chosen model is not sufficient to capture the velocity behavior. Analysis using posterior predictive checks can be used to establish whether a better model is required, although more complex models come with additional computational cost, often taking more than several hours to converge when sampling the Bayesian posterior. We, therefore, recommend it be viewed as a complementary method to that of the STFT-based approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Review of Scientific Instruments
Review of Scientific Instruments 工程技术-物理:应用
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
758
审稿时长
2.6 months
期刊介绍: Review of Scientific Instruments, is committed to the publication of advances in scientific instruments, apparatuses, and techniques. RSI seeks to meet the needs of engineers and scientists in physics, chemistry, and the life sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信