Johanna Xemaire, Ines Wolz, Dustin Werle, Carolin Dudschig, Jennifer Svaldi
{"title":"用自我描述身体图片测量成年女性神经性贪食症、身体高度不满和健康对照的内隐回避倾向。","authors":"Johanna Xemaire, Ines Wolz, Dustin Werle, Carolin Dudschig, Jennifer Svaldi","doi":"10.1002/eat.24523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Body dissatisfaction is an important factor for the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa (BN). At the behavioral level, body dissatisfaction often manifests itself in excessive body-related avoidance, thought to act as a negative reinforcer. The Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) is an implicit measure of avoidance behavior, but the literature on body-related avoidance measured by the AAT is inconclusive. In the present study, we considered self-reference and cognitive load as important dimensions to better understand AAT-evoked biases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adult female participants with BN (n = 21), high body dissatisfaction (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20) completed a novel, slider-based AAT with task-irrelevant self-depicting body pictures and scrambled versions of these pictures as control stimuli. We further induced cognitive load through a flanker task to assess possible moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant Group × Picture Type × Motion Direction interaction for either motion onset or motion duration. The results further revealed a standard flanker effect in that participants reacted faster to compatible trials; but this was independent of Group membership, Picture Type, and Motion Direction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In sum, the AAT did not yield evidence of body-related avoidance behavior. Future studies should control for the occurrence of body checking (i.e., increased focus on disliked body parts which could activate approach-biases) during AAT, manipulate the strength of self-reference, e.g., by presenting/omitting facial cues in self-depicting body pictures, and consider the task relevance of (and thus overt attention to) the body pictures.</p>","PeriodicalId":51067,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Implicit Approach-Avoidance Tendencies Using Self-Depicting Body Pictures in Female Adults With Bulimia Nervosa, High Body Dissatisfaction and Healthy Controls.\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Xemaire, Ines Wolz, Dustin Werle, Carolin Dudschig, Jennifer Svaldi\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eat.24523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Body dissatisfaction is an important factor for the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa (BN). At the behavioral level, body dissatisfaction often manifests itself in excessive body-related avoidance, thought to act as a negative reinforcer. The Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) is an implicit measure of avoidance behavior, but the literature on body-related avoidance measured by the AAT is inconclusive. In the present study, we considered self-reference and cognitive load as important dimensions to better understand AAT-evoked biases.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Adult female participants with BN (n = 21), high body dissatisfaction (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20) completed a novel, slider-based AAT with task-irrelevant self-depicting body pictures and scrambled versions of these pictures as control stimuli. We further induced cognitive load through a flanker task to assess possible moderating effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant Group × Picture Type × Motion Direction interaction for either motion onset or motion duration. The results further revealed a standard flanker effect in that participants reacted faster to compatible trials; but this was independent of Group membership, Picture Type, and Motion Direction.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>In sum, the AAT did not yield evidence of body-related avoidance behavior. Future studies should control for the occurrence of body checking (i.e., increased focus on disliked body parts which could activate approach-biases) during AAT, manipulate the strength of self-reference, e.g., by presenting/omitting facial cues in self-depicting body pictures, and consider the task relevance of (and thus overt attention to) the body pictures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Eating Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24523\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Eating Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24523","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Measuring Implicit Approach-Avoidance Tendencies Using Self-Depicting Body Pictures in Female Adults With Bulimia Nervosa, High Body Dissatisfaction and Healthy Controls.
Objective: Body dissatisfaction is an important factor for the etiology and maintenance of eating disorders such as bulimia nervosa (BN). At the behavioral level, body dissatisfaction often manifests itself in excessive body-related avoidance, thought to act as a negative reinforcer. The Approach-Avoidance Task (AAT) is an implicit measure of avoidance behavior, but the literature on body-related avoidance measured by the AAT is inconclusive. In the present study, we considered self-reference and cognitive load as important dimensions to better understand AAT-evoked biases.
Method: Adult female participants with BN (n = 21), high body dissatisfaction (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20) completed a novel, slider-based AAT with task-irrelevant self-depicting body pictures and scrambled versions of these pictures as control stimuli. We further induced cognitive load through a flanker task to assess possible moderating effects.
Results: There was no significant Group × Picture Type × Motion Direction interaction for either motion onset or motion duration. The results further revealed a standard flanker effect in that participants reacted faster to compatible trials; but this was independent of Group membership, Picture Type, and Motion Direction.
Discussion: In sum, the AAT did not yield evidence of body-related avoidance behavior. Future studies should control for the occurrence of body checking (i.e., increased focus on disliked body parts which could activate approach-biases) during AAT, manipulate the strength of self-reference, e.g., by presenting/omitting facial cues in self-depicting body pictures, and consider the task relevance of (and thus overt attention to) the body pictures.
期刊介绍:
Articles featured in the journal describe state-of-the-art scientific research on theory, methodology, etiology, clinical practice, and policy related to eating disorders, as well as contributions that facilitate scholarly critique and discussion of science and practice in the field. Theoretical and empirical work on obesity or healthy eating falls within the journal’s scope inasmuch as it facilitates the advancement of efforts to describe and understand, prevent, or treat eating disorders. IJED welcomes submissions from all regions of the world and representing all levels of inquiry (including basic science, clinical trials, implementation research, and dissemination studies), and across a full range of scientific methods, disciplines, and approaches.