足球裁判和弹性行为:与心理不灵活性和完美主义的关系。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Félix Arbinaga, Gerardo A Araya-Vargas, Emilio Moreno-San-Pedro
{"title":"足球裁判和弹性行为:与心理不灵活性和完美主义的关系。","authors":"Félix Arbinaga, Gerardo A Araya-Vargas, Emilio Moreno-San-Pedro","doi":"10.1177/00315125251365290","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study analyzes how perfectionism and psychological inflexibility relate to resilience in soccer referees. Data were collected online from 199 referees (91.96% male, <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 28.24, <i>SD</i> = 8.47). Of the total sample, 73.37% were amateur and 26.63% were semi-professional or professional, with no significant differences in the scores of the three variables. Referees with low resilience reported higher psychological inflexibility, greater maladaptive perfectionism, and lower adaptive perfectionism. Participants grouped with high-medium psychological inflexibility showed a higher risk (<i>OR</i> = 4.079) of being in the low-resilience group compared to those with low psychological inflexibility. Linear regression models show a positive and significant predictive capacity for resilience for adaptive perfectionism (<i>β</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> < .001), but a negative one for psychological inflexibility (<i>β</i> = -0.213, <i>p</i> = .003) and maladaptive perfectionism (<i>β</i> = -0.323, <i>p</i> < .001). The implications of these results in the sports context are analyzed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251365290"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soccer Refereeing and Resilient Behavior: Relationships With Psychological Inflexibility and Perfectionism.\",\"authors\":\"Félix Arbinaga, Gerardo A Araya-Vargas, Emilio Moreno-San-Pedro\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125251365290\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study analyzes how perfectionism and psychological inflexibility relate to resilience in soccer referees. Data were collected online from 199 referees (91.96% male, <i>M</i><sub><i>age</i></sub> = 28.24, <i>SD</i> = 8.47). Of the total sample, 73.37% were amateur and 26.63% were semi-professional or professional, with no significant differences in the scores of the three variables. Referees with low resilience reported higher psychological inflexibility, greater maladaptive perfectionism, and lower adaptive perfectionism. Participants grouped with high-medium psychological inflexibility showed a higher risk (<i>OR</i> = 4.079) of being in the low-resilience group compared to those with low psychological inflexibility. Linear regression models show a positive and significant predictive capacity for resilience for adaptive perfectionism (<i>β</i> = 0.468, <i>p</i> < .001), but a negative one for psychological inflexibility (<i>β</i> = -0.213, <i>p</i> = .003) and maladaptive perfectionism (<i>β</i> = -0.323, <i>p</i> < .001). The implications of these results in the sports context are analyzed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"315125251365290\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251365290\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251365290","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

该研究分析了足球裁判的完美主义和心理不灵活性与适应力之间的关系。在线收集199名审稿人数据,其中男性91.96%,Mage = 28.24, SD = 8.47。在整个样本中,73.37%的人是业余的,26.63%的人是半专业或专业的,三个变量的得分没有显著差异。低弹性裁判的心理不灵活性较高,适应不良完美主义程度较高,适应完美主义程度较低。与心理不灵活性低的参与者相比,中高心理不灵活性组的参与者进入低弹性组的风险更高(OR = 4.079)。线性回归模型对适应性完美主义的弹性具有显著的正向预测能力(β = 0.468, p < 0.001),对心理不灵活性(β = -0.213, p = 0.003)和适应不良完美主义(β = -0.323, p < 0.001)具有显著的负向预测能力。分析了这些结果在体育背景下的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soccer Refereeing and Resilient Behavior: Relationships With Psychological Inflexibility and Perfectionism.

The study analyzes how perfectionism and psychological inflexibility relate to resilience in soccer referees. Data were collected online from 199 referees (91.96% male, Mage = 28.24, SD = 8.47). Of the total sample, 73.37% were amateur and 26.63% were semi-professional or professional, with no significant differences in the scores of the three variables. Referees with low resilience reported higher psychological inflexibility, greater maladaptive perfectionism, and lower adaptive perfectionism. Participants grouped with high-medium psychological inflexibility showed a higher risk (OR = 4.079) of being in the low-resilience group compared to those with low psychological inflexibility. Linear regression models show a positive and significant predictive capacity for resilience for adaptive perfectionism (β = 0.468, p < .001), but a negative one for psychological inflexibility (β = -0.213, p = .003) and maladaptive perfectionism (β = -0.323, p < .001). The implications of these results in the sports context are analyzed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信