孕期能量摄入和身体活动与妊娠期体重增加:随机对照生活方式干预试验数据的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Yixin Chen, Sasithorn Sarnthiyakul, Sophie K F Michel, Chuyue Wu, Hans Hauner, Ondine S von Ehrenstein, Jihong Liu, Liwei Chen
{"title":"孕期能量摄入和身体活动与妊娠期体重增加:随机对照生活方式干预试验数据的系统回顾和剂量反应荟萃分析","authors":"Yixin Chen, Sasithorn Sarnthiyakul, Sophie K F Michel, Chuyue Wu, Hans Hauner, Ondine S von Ehrenstein, Jihong Liu, Liwei Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between energy intake (EI) and physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and gestational weight gain (GWG) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs measuring EI and PA at least twice and total GWG during pregnancy were eligible. To synthesize PA measures reported on different scales, standardized mean change per day (SMC/day) were obtained by dividing the change in PA by the standard deviation of the change. We estimated mean changes in EI, PA, and mean total GWG across studies, accounting for clustering within studies. One-stage dose-response meta-analyses (DRMA) quantified the additional GWG associated with changes in EI and PA during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 RCTs with 7,705 participants were included. The mean total GWG was 11.99 kg (95% CI: 11.05 kg to 12.94 kg). The mean baseline EI was 1977 kcal/day across studies (range: 1652 to 2777 kcal/day) and the mean increase in EI throughout pregnancy was 132 kcal/day (95% CI: 54 to 209 kcal/day). The average change in PA during pregnancy was - 0.11 SMC/day (95% CI: -0.33 to 0.12 SMC/day). DRMA indicated 0.30 kg additional weight gain per 100 kcal/day increase in EI (95% CI: -0.01 kg to 0.60 kg, P = 0.06). The effect size was greater in studies with low risk of bias vs. high risk of bias (0.57 vs. -0.20 kg, P for difference = 0.02). DRMA showed 0.24 kg less weight gain per 0.25 SMC/day increase in PA (-0.50 to 0.02 kg, P = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Average GWG often exceeds recommendations of current guidelines, particularly among women with overweight/obesity (OWOB), while average increases in EI were below current recommendations, and PA levels were frequently observed to decrease. DRMA further suggests that GWG may be modifiable through changes in EI and PA with greater EI increases or PA reductions linked to greater GWG, especially among women with OW/OB. Despite challenges in precisely quantifying these associations, integrated findings from this comprehensive systematic review and subgroup/sensitivity analyses highlight the need for more individualized nutrition and exercise recommendations and may warrant revisiting current guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":19203,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Journal","volume":"24 1","pages":"123"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333096/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Energy intake and physical activity over the course of pregnancy and gestational weight gain: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled lifestyle intervention trials.\",\"authors\":\"Yixin Chen, Sasithorn Sarnthiyakul, Sophie K F Michel, Chuyue Wu, Hans Hauner, Ondine S von Ehrenstein, Jihong Liu, Liwei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between energy intake (EI) and physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and gestational weight gain (GWG) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>RCTs measuring EI and PA at least twice and total GWG during pregnancy were eligible. To synthesize PA measures reported on different scales, standardized mean change per day (SMC/day) were obtained by dividing the change in PA by the standard deviation of the change. We estimated mean changes in EI, PA, and mean total GWG across studies, accounting for clustering within studies. One-stage dose-response meta-analyses (DRMA) quantified the additional GWG associated with changes in EI and PA during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 21 RCTs with 7,705 participants were included. The mean total GWG was 11.99 kg (95% CI: 11.05 kg to 12.94 kg). The mean baseline EI was 1977 kcal/day across studies (range: 1652 to 2777 kcal/day) and the mean increase in EI throughout pregnancy was 132 kcal/day (95% CI: 54 to 209 kcal/day). The average change in PA during pregnancy was - 0.11 SMC/day (95% CI: -0.33 to 0.12 SMC/day). DRMA indicated 0.30 kg additional weight gain per 100 kcal/day increase in EI (95% CI: -0.01 kg to 0.60 kg, P = 0.06). The effect size was greater in studies with low risk of bias vs. high risk of bias (0.57 vs. -0.20 kg, P for difference = 0.02). DRMA showed 0.24 kg less weight gain per 0.25 SMC/day increase in PA (-0.50 to 0.02 kg, P = 0.07).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Average GWG often exceeds recommendations of current guidelines, particularly among women with overweight/obesity (OWOB), while average increases in EI were below current recommendations, and PA levels were frequently observed to decrease. DRMA further suggests that GWG may be modifiable through changes in EI and PA with greater EI increases or PA reductions linked to greater GWG, especially among women with OW/OB. Despite challenges in precisely quantifying these associations, integrated findings from this comprehensive systematic review and subgroup/sensitivity analyses highlight the need for more individualized nutrition and exercise recommendations and may warrant revisiting current guidelines.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"123\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12333096/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12937-025-01182-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在量化随机对照试验(RCTs)中妊娠期能量摄入(EI)和身体活动(PA)与妊娠期体重增加(GWG)之间的关系。方法:采用随机对照试验(rct)测量EI和PA至少2次及妊娠期总GWG。为了综合不同尺度上报告的PA测量,将PA变化除以变化的标准差,得到标准化的每天平均变化(SMC/day)。我们估计了研究中EI、PA和平均总GWG的平均变化,考虑了研究中的聚类。单阶段剂量反应荟萃分析(DRMA)量化了妊娠期间与EI和PA变化相关的额外GWG。结果:共纳入21项rct, 7705名受试者。平均总GWG为11.99 kg (95% CI: 11.05 kg ~ 12.94 kg)。所有研究的平均基线EI为1977千卡/天(范围:1652至2777千卡/天),整个孕期EI平均增加为132千卡/天(95% CI: 54至209千卡/天)。妊娠期间PA的平均变化为- 0.11 SMC/天(95% CI: -0.33至0.12 SMC/天)。DRMA表明,每增加100千卡/天,体重增加0.30公斤(95% CI: -0.01公斤至0.60公斤,P = 0.06)。低偏倚风险研究的效应量大于高偏倚风险研究(0.57 vs -0.20 kg, P = 0.02)。每增加0.25 SMC/d, DRMA的增重减少0.24 kg (-0.50 ~ 0.02 kg, P = 0.07)。结论:平均GWG经常超过当前指南的推荐值,特别是在超重/肥胖(OWOB)的女性中,而EI的平均增加低于当前推荐值,并且经常观察到PA水平下降。DRMA进一步表明,GWG可能通过EI和PA的变化而改变,EI增加或PA减少与GWG增加有关,特别是在OW/OB女性中。尽管在精确量化这些关联方面存在挑战,但这项全面的系统评价和亚组/敏感性分析的综合发现强调了更个性化的营养和运动建议的必要性,并且可能需要重新审视当前的指南。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Energy intake and physical activity over the course of pregnancy and gestational weight gain: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of data from randomized controlled lifestyle intervention trials.

Background: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the relationship between energy intake (EI) and physical activity (PA) during pregnancy and gestational weight gain (GWG) in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: RCTs measuring EI and PA at least twice and total GWG during pregnancy were eligible. To synthesize PA measures reported on different scales, standardized mean change per day (SMC/day) were obtained by dividing the change in PA by the standard deviation of the change. We estimated mean changes in EI, PA, and mean total GWG across studies, accounting for clustering within studies. One-stage dose-response meta-analyses (DRMA) quantified the additional GWG associated with changes in EI and PA during pregnancy.

Results: A total of 21 RCTs with 7,705 participants were included. The mean total GWG was 11.99 kg (95% CI: 11.05 kg to 12.94 kg). The mean baseline EI was 1977 kcal/day across studies (range: 1652 to 2777 kcal/day) and the mean increase in EI throughout pregnancy was 132 kcal/day (95% CI: 54 to 209 kcal/day). The average change in PA during pregnancy was - 0.11 SMC/day (95% CI: -0.33 to 0.12 SMC/day). DRMA indicated 0.30 kg additional weight gain per 100 kcal/day increase in EI (95% CI: -0.01 kg to 0.60 kg, P = 0.06). The effect size was greater in studies with low risk of bias vs. high risk of bias (0.57 vs. -0.20 kg, P for difference = 0.02). DRMA showed 0.24 kg less weight gain per 0.25 SMC/day increase in PA (-0.50 to 0.02 kg, P = 0.07).

Conclusions: Average GWG often exceeds recommendations of current guidelines, particularly among women with overweight/obesity (OWOB), while average increases in EI were below current recommendations, and PA levels were frequently observed to decrease. DRMA further suggests that GWG may be modifiable through changes in EI and PA with greater EI increases or PA reductions linked to greater GWG, especially among women with OW/OB. Despite challenges in precisely quantifying these associations, integrated findings from this comprehensive systematic review and subgroup/sensitivity analyses highlight the need for more individualized nutrition and exercise recommendations and may warrant revisiting current guidelines.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Journal
Nutrition Journal NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Journal publishes surveillance, epidemiologic, and intervention research that sheds light on i) influences (e.g., familial, environmental) on eating patterns; ii) associations between eating patterns and health, and iii) strategies to improve eating patterns among populations. The journal also welcomes manuscripts reporting on the psychometric properties (e.g., validity, reliability) and feasibility of methods (e.g., for assessing dietary intake) for human nutrition research. In addition, study protocols for controlled trials and cohort studies, with an emphasis on methods for assessing dietary exposures and outcomes as well as intervention components, will be considered. Manuscripts that consider eating patterns holistically, as opposed to solely reductionist approaches that focus on specific dietary components in isolation, are encouraged. Also encouraged are papers that take a holistic or systems perspective in attempting to understand possible compensatory and differential effects of nutrition interventions. The journal does not consider animal studies. In addition to the influence of eating patterns for human health, we also invite research providing insights into the environmental sustainability of dietary practices. Again, a holistic perspective is encouraged, for example, through the consideration of how eating patterns might maximize both human and planetary health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信