不仅仅是一个症状计数:用生活压力访谈测量酒精使用障碍的功能。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY
Dylan E Kirsch, Erica N Grodin, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Lara A Ray
{"title":"不仅仅是一个症状计数:用生活压力访谈测量酒精使用障碍的功能。","authors":"Dylan E Kirsch, Erica N Grodin, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Lara A Ray","doi":"10.15288/jsad.25-00030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The alcohol field has increasingly recognized that functioning plays a key role in the clinical course of alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, there remains a need for comprehensive instruments that capture functioning in this population. This study examined the utility of the UCLA Life Stress Interview Chronic Stress Assessment (LSI)-a functional domains-based assessment widely used in mood disorder research-as a tool to measure functioning in key life domains in AUD. We: (1) compare LSI scores between individuals with and without current AUD; and (2) examine whether LSI scores are associated with recent alcohol use and AUD symptomology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary case-control study included 38 adults with AUD and 35 age- and biological sex-matched controls. The LSI was used to assess functioning in interpersonal, occupational, personal health, and family health domains over the prior 6-months. The Timeline Followback was used to assess recent alcohol use, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 was used to assess AUD symptomology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with AUD exhibited significantly poorer interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning, compared to controls. Among individuals with AUD, worse interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning correlated with a higher number of AUD symptoms, and both interpersonal and occupational functioning also correlated with greater recent alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This secondary study provides preliminary support for the LSI as a tool to assess functioning in AUD, offering an unbiased, addiction-independent evaluation of functioning across key domains. Future work should replicate results in larger samples, conduct formal psychometric evaluation, and examine the effects of biological, demographic, and clinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":17159,"journal":{"name":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"More Than a Symptom Count: Measuring Functioning in Alcohol Use Disorder With the Life Stress Interview.\",\"authors\":\"Dylan E Kirsch, Erica N Grodin, Danielle Keenan-Miller, Lara A Ray\",\"doi\":\"10.15288/jsad.25-00030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The alcohol field has increasingly recognized that functioning plays a key role in the clinical course of alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, there remains a need for comprehensive instruments that capture functioning in this population. This study examined the utility of the UCLA Life Stress Interview Chronic Stress Assessment (LSI)-a functional domains-based assessment widely used in mood disorder research-as a tool to measure functioning in key life domains in AUD. We: (1) compare LSI scores between individuals with and without current AUD; and (2) examine whether LSI scores are associated with recent alcohol use and AUD symptomology.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This secondary case-control study included 38 adults with AUD and 35 age- and biological sex-matched controls. The LSI was used to assess functioning in interpersonal, occupational, personal health, and family health domains over the prior 6-months. The Timeline Followback was used to assess recent alcohol use, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 was used to assess AUD symptomology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Individuals with AUD exhibited significantly poorer interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning, compared to controls. Among individuals with AUD, worse interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning correlated with a higher number of AUD symptoms, and both interpersonal and occupational functioning also correlated with greater recent alcohol use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This secondary study provides preliminary support for the LSI as a tool to assess functioning in AUD, offering an unbiased, addiction-independent evaluation of functioning across key domains. Future work should replicate results in larger samples, conduct formal psychometric evaluation, and examine the effects of biological, demographic, and clinical factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17159,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.25-00030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of studies on alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15288/jsad.25-00030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:酒精领域越来越多地认识到功能在酒精使用障碍(AUD)的临床过程中起着关键作用。然而,仍然需要掌握这一群体功能的综合工具。本研究检验了UCLA生活压力访谈慢性压力评估(LSI)作为衡量AUD患者关键生活领域功能的工具的效用。LSI是一种基于功能领域的评估,广泛应用于情绪障碍研究。我们:(1)比较有和没有当前AUD的个体之间的LSI得分;(2)检查LSI评分是否与近期饮酒和AUD症状相关。方法:这项继发性病例对照研究包括38名成年AUD患者和35名年龄和生理性别匹配的对照组。在过去的6个月里,LSI被用来评估人际、职业、个人健康和家庭健康领域的功能。时间线随访用于评估近期的酒精使用情况,DSM-5的结构化临床访谈用于评估AUD症状。结果:与对照组相比,AUD患者表现出明显较差的人际、职业和个人健康功能。在患有AUD的个体中,更差的人际、职业和个人健康功能与AUD症状的数量相关,人际和职业功能也与最近更多的酒精使用相关。结论:这项二级研究为大规模集成电路作为评估AUD功能的工具提供了初步支持,为关键领域的功能提供了公正、独立于成瘾的评估。未来的工作应该在更大的样本中重复结果,进行正式的心理测量评估,并检查生物学、人口统计学和临床因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
More Than a Symptom Count: Measuring Functioning in Alcohol Use Disorder With the Life Stress Interview.

Objective: The alcohol field has increasingly recognized that functioning plays a key role in the clinical course of alcohol use disorder (AUD). However, there remains a need for comprehensive instruments that capture functioning in this population. This study examined the utility of the UCLA Life Stress Interview Chronic Stress Assessment (LSI)-a functional domains-based assessment widely used in mood disorder research-as a tool to measure functioning in key life domains in AUD. We: (1) compare LSI scores between individuals with and without current AUD; and (2) examine whether LSI scores are associated with recent alcohol use and AUD symptomology.

Methods: This secondary case-control study included 38 adults with AUD and 35 age- and biological sex-matched controls. The LSI was used to assess functioning in interpersonal, occupational, personal health, and family health domains over the prior 6-months. The Timeline Followback was used to assess recent alcohol use, and the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 was used to assess AUD symptomology.

Results: Individuals with AUD exhibited significantly poorer interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning, compared to controls. Among individuals with AUD, worse interpersonal, occupational, and personal health functioning correlated with a higher number of AUD symptoms, and both interpersonal and occupational functioning also correlated with greater recent alcohol use.

Conclusion: This secondary study provides preliminary support for the LSI as a tool to assess functioning in AUD, offering an unbiased, addiction-independent evaluation of functioning across key domains. Future work should replicate results in larger samples, conduct formal psychometric evaluation, and examine the effects of biological, demographic, and clinical factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs began in 1940 as the Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol. It was founded by Howard W. Haggard, M.D., director of Yale University’s Laboratory of Applied Physiology. Dr. Haggard was a physiologist studying the effects of alcohol on the body, and he started the Journal as a way to publish the increasing amount of research on alcohol use, abuse, and treatment that emerged from Yale and other institutions in the years following the repeal of Prohibition in 1933. In addition to original research, the Journal also published abstracts summarizing other published documents dealing with alcohol. At Yale, Dr. Haggard built a large team of alcohol researchers within the Laboratory of Applied Physiology—including E.M. Jellinek, who became managing editor of the Journal in 1941. In 1943, to bring together the various alcohol research projects conducted by the Laboratory, Dr. Haggard formed the Section of Studies on Alcohol, which also became home to the Journal and its editorial staff. In 1950, the Section was renamed the Center of Alcohol Studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信