Katrin Gradl,Sonja Sterneder,Kristin Kahlenberg,Beate Brandl,Thomas Skurk,Veronika Somoza
{"title":"随机对照试验:低水解程度的苦味豌豆蛋白水解干预对中等超重男性受试者能量摄入的影响。","authors":"Katrin Gradl,Sonja Sterneder,Kristin Kahlenberg,Beate Brandl,Thomas Skurk,Veronika Somoza","doi":"10.1002/mnfr.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optimizing plant-based protein intake, such as pea protein hydrolysates (PPHs), may aid in obesity management. This study investigated whether PPHs with varying bitterness and degrees of hydrolysis (DH) differently affect satiety in healthy male participants. In a short-term randomized control trial, 19 moderately overweight men (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) consumed boluses of 75 g glucose plus 15 g PPH (control without PPH; PPH1: less bitter, DH = 35%; PPH2: more bitter, DH = 23%). Upon PPH administration, energy intake from an ad libitum breakfast was reduced by -126 ± 329 kcal (p < 0.05) in the PPH2 group compared to the control. PPH1 decreased plasma ghrelin and DPP-4 levels (AUC: -9.4 ± 19.6 and -12.5 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying was delayed by a mean of 65% (p < 0.0001) after PPH2 consumption, assessed via 13C-Na-acetate breath test. Bitterness and DH of PPH influence satiety signals differently. PPH1 (less bitter, higher DH) reduces DPP-4 and ghrelin levels, promoting satiety. PPH2 (more bitter, lower DH) delays gastric emptying, enhancing satiation. These findings highlight the potential of PPHs as functional ingredients in weight management strategies.","PeriodicalId":212,"journal":{"name":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","volume":"14 1","pages":"e70195"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized Controlled Trial: Effects of a Bitter-Tasting Pea Protein Hydrolysate Intervention With Low Degree of Hydrolyzation on Energy Intake in Moderately Overweight Male Subjects.\",\"authors\":\"Katrin Gradl,Sonja Sterneder,Kristin Kahlenberg,Beate Brandl,Thomas Skurk,Veronika Somoza\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mnfr.70195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optimizing plant-based protein intake, such as pea protein hydrolysates (PPHs), may aid in obesity management. This study investigated whether PPHs with varying bitterness and degrees of hydrolysis (DH) differently affect satiety in healthy male participants. In a short-term randomized control trial, 19 moderately overweight men (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) consumed boluses of 75 g glucose plus 15 g PPH (control without PPH; PPH1: less bitter, DH = 35%; PPH2: more bitter, DH = 23%). Upon PPH administration, energy intake from an ad libitum breakfast was reduced by -126 ± 329 kcal (p < 0.05) in the PPH2 group compared to the control. PPH1 decreased plasma ghrelin and DPP-4 levels (AUC: -9.4 ± 19.6 and -12.5 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying was delayed by a mean of 65% (p < 0.0001) after PPH2 consumption, assessed via 13C-Na-acetate breath test. Bitterness and DH of PPH influence satiety signals differently. PPH1 (less bitter, higher DH) reduces DPP-4 and ghrelin levels, promoting satiety. PPH2 (more bitter, lower DH) delays gastric emptying, enhancing satiation. These findings highlight the potential of PPHs as functional ingredients in weight management strategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"e70195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70195\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular Nutrition & Food Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mnfr.70195","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Randomized Controlled Trial: Effects of a Bitter-Tasting Pea Protein Hydrolysate Intervention With Low Degree of Hydrolyzation on Energy Intake in Moderately Overweight Male Subjects.
Optimizing plant-based protein intake, such as pea protein hydrolysates (PPHs), may aid in obesity management. This study investigated whether PPHs with varying bitterness and degrees of hydrolysis (DH) differently affect satiety in healthy male participants. In a short-term randomized control trial, 19 moderately overweight men (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) consumed boluses of 75 g glucose plus 15 g PPH (control without PPH; PPH1: less bitter, DH = 35%; PPH2: more bitter, DH = 23%). Upon PPH administration, energy intake from an ad libitum breakfast was reduced by -126 ± 329 kcal (p < 0.05) in the PPH2 group compared to the control. PPH1 decreased plasma ghrelin and DPP-4 levels (AUC: -9.4 ± 19.6 and -12.5 ± 24.7, p < 0.05). Gastric emptying was delayed by a mean of 65% (p < 0.0001) after PPH2 consumption, assessed via 13C-Na-acetate breath test. Bitterness and DH of PPH influence satiety signals differently. PPH1 (less bitter, higher DH) reduces DPP-4 and ghrelin levels, promoting satiety. PPH2 (more bitter, lower DH) delays gastric emptying, enhancing satiation. These findings highlight the potential of PPHs as functional ingredients in weight management strategies.
期刊介绍:
Molecular Nutrition & Food Research is a primary research journal devoted to health, safety and all aspects of molecular nutrition such as nutritional biochemistry, nutrigenomics and metabolomics aiming to link the information arising from related disciplines:
Bioactivity: Nutritional and medical effects of food constituents including bioavailability and kinetics.
Immunology: Understanding the interactions of food and the immune system.
Microbiology: Food spoilage, food pathogens, chemical and physical approaches of fermented foods and novel microbial processes.
Chemistry: Isolation and analysis of bioactive food ingredients while considering environmental aspects.