在未训练的个体中,使用自选间隔对激活后的表现增强效果不明显。

IF 1.8 4区 心理学 Q4 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Gabriel Fontanetti, Renan Vieira Barreto, Arthur Zecchin, Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção, Túlio Luiz Banja Fernandes, Amilton Vieira, Camila Coelho Greco, Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima
{"title":"在未训练的个体中,使用自选间隔对激活后的表现增强效果不明显。","authors":"Gabriel Fontanetti, Renan Vieira Barreto, Arthur Zecchin, Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção, Túlio Luiz Banja Fernandes, Amilton Vieira, Camila Coelho Greco, Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima","doi":"10.1177/00315125251365060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigated the efficacy of adopting self-selected interval (SSI) to elicit post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in untrained individuals and compared it to adopting the best fixed recovery interval (BST). Eleven male participants (age: 21.6 ± 2.1 years; body mass: 76.6 ± 11.1 kg; height: 175 ± 4 cm; 5RM squat load: 108 ± 17 kg) with no experience with strength training participated in three experimental sessions in a randomized order. The three experimental sessions consisted of: (1) a control session (CON), with countermovement jump (CMJ) height assessments performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after participants remained seated on a chair without performing any conditioning activity (CA) protocol; (2) a session with fixed recovery interval (FRI), with CMJ height assessment performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after a CA consisting of five back squats with a 5 repetition maximum load, and; (3) a session with SSI, with CMJ height assessment performed only once after the CA and participants adopting a SSI based on a readiness scale. No significant differences were found in CMJ performance between baseline (BL) and post-CA in the CON session and in the SSI session. CMJ height in the BST was 4.4% higher than BL value during the FRI session (BL: 31.5 ± 3.1 cm; post: 32.9 ± 2.6 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.05, d = 0.5). Therefore, it is possible to conclude that, although untrained individuals are not able to identify an ideal recovery interval after PA using a readiness scale, they can be responsive to PAPE when adopting a FRI.</p>","PeriodicalId":19869,"journal":{"name":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","volume":" ","pages":"315125251365060"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Use of Self-Selected Interval is not Effective in Eliciting Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Untrained Individuals.\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel Fontanetti, Renan Vieira Barreto, Arthur Zecchin, Claudio de Oliveira Assumpção, Túlio Luiz Banja Fernandes, Amilton Vieira, Camila Coelho Greco, Leonardo Coelho Rabello de Lima\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00315125251365060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigated the efficacy of adopting self-selected interval (SSI) to elicit post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in untrained individuals and compared it to adopting the best fixed recovery interval (BST). Eleven male participants (age: 21.6 ± 2.1 years; body mass: 76.6 ± 11.1 kg; height: 175 ± 4 cm; 5RM squat load: 108 ± 17 kg) with no experience with strength training participated in three experimental sessions in a randomized order. The three experimental sessions consisted of: (1) a control session (CON), with countermovement jump (CMJ) height assessments performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after participants remained seated on a chair without performing any conditioning activity (CA) protocol; (2) a session with fixed recovery interval (FRI), with CMJ height assessment performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after a CA consisting of five back squats with a 5 repetition maximum load, and; (3) a session with SSI, with CMJ height assessment performed only once after the CA and participants adopting a SSI based on a readiness scale. No significant differences were found in CMJ performance between baseline (BL) and post-CA in the CON session and in the SSI session. CMJ height in the BST was 4.4% higher than BL value during the FRI session (BL: 31.5 ± 3.1 cm; post: 32.9 ± 2.6 cm, <i>p</i> < 0.05, d = 0.5). Therefore, it is possible to conclude that, although untrained individuals are not able to identify an ideal recovery interval after PA using a readiness scale, they can be responsive to PAPE when adopting a FRI.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"315125251365060\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perceptual and Motor Skills\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251365060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perceptual and Motor Skills","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00315125251365060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究探讨了采用自我选择间隔(SSI)诱导未训练个体激活后表现增强(PAPE)的效果,并将其与采用最佳固定恢复间隔(BST)进行了比较。男性11例(年龄:21.6±2.1岁;体重:76.6±11.1 kg;高度:175±4cm;5RM深蹲负荷:108±17 kg),没有力量训练经验,按随机顺序参加三个实验。三个实验阶段包括:(1)一个控制阶段(CON),参与者在不进行任何条件反射活动(CA)方案的情况下坐在椅子上4分钟前和2、4、6、8和10分钟后进行反动作跳跃(CMJ)高度评估;(2)固定恢复间隔(FRI), CMJ高度评估在前4分钟和后2、4、6、8和10分钟进行,包括5次背深蹲,最大负荷5次;(3)一个会话,在CA和参与者采用基于准备程度的SSI之后,只进行一次CMJ高度评估。在CON阶段和SSI阶段,基线(BL)和ca后的CMJ表现没有显著差异。在FRI期间,BST的CMJ高度比BL高4.4% (BL: 31.5±3.1 cm;后位:32.9±2.6 cm, p < 0.05, d = 0.5)。因此,可以得出这样的结论:尽管未经训练的个体无法使用准备程度量表确定PA后的理想恢复间隔,但当采用FRI时,他们可以对PAPE做出反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Use of Self-Selected Interval is not Effective in Eliciting Post-activation Performance Enhancement in Untrained Individuals.

This study investigated the efficacy of adopting self-selected interval (SSI) to elicit post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) in untrained individuals and compared it to adopting the best fixed recovery interval (BST). Eleven male participants (age: 21.6 ± 2.1 years; body mass: 76.6 ± 11.1 kg; height: 175 ± 4 cm; 5RM squat load: 108 ± 17 kg) with no experience with strength training participated in three experimental sessions in a randomized order. The three experimental sessions consisted of: (1) a control session (CON), with countermovement jump (CMJ) height assessments performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after participants remained seated on a chair without performing any conditioning activity (CA) protocol; (2) a session with fixed recovery interval (FRI), with CMJ height assessment performed 4 min before and 2, 4, 6, 8, and 10 min after a CA consisting of five back squats with a 5 repetition maximum load, and; (3) a session with SSI, with CMJ height assessment performed only once after the CA and participants adopting a SSI based on a readiness scale. No significant differences were found in CMJ performance between baseline (BL) and post-CA in the CON session and in the SSI session. CMJ height in the BST was 4.4% higher than BL value during the FRI session (BL: 31.5 ± 3.1 cm; post: 32.9 ± 2.6 cm, p < 0.05, d = 0.5). Therefore, it is possible to conclude that, although untrained individuals are not able to identify an ideal recovery interval after PA using a readiness scale, they can be responsive to PAPE when adopting a FRI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Perceptual and Motor Skills
Perceptual and Motor Skills PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
110
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信