呼吁包容:创伤治疗研究中的智障儿童。

IF 2 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL
Zackary F Moore, Anna W Wright, Carine E Leslie, Allison D'Aguilar, Ananda B Amstadter, Ruth C Brown
{"title":"呼吁包容:创伤治疗研究中的智障儿童。","authors":"Zackary F Moore, Anna W Wright, Carine E Leslie, Allison D'Aguilar, Ananda B Amstadter, Ruth C Brown","doi":"10.1111/jir.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience disparities in mental health care despite experiencing increased exposure to trauma such as physical, emotional and sexual abuse. Studies have suggested that the exclusion of people with ID from medical research may contribute to disparities in health care. It is currently unknown to what extent children with ID are excluded from trauma treatment research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 62) included in the most up-to-date International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) clinical care guidelines meta-analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments were reanalysed and coded to determine whether or not children with ID or other developmental disabilities that co-occur with ID were excluded based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were double-coded by the research team. The corresponding authors of the studies were asked to complete a survey rating the likelihood that children with ID would have been eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the studies, 61.3% reviewed reported exclusion criteria based on a diagnosis of intellectual disability, cognitive impairment, autism spectrum disorder, organic/neurological conditions, or other related terms (e.g., 'significant learning difficulties'). Operationalisation of exclusion criteria was sparse. Few studies reported the number of children excluded from trials based on an ID diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence base for the ISTSS clinical care guidelines of child PTSD treatment is not representative of children with ID. Improved documentation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, reporting of disability as a demographic characteristic, and inclusion of children with ID in PTSD treatment trials are needed to improve representation of children with ID in PTSD research.</p>","PeriodicalId":16163,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Call for Inclusion: Children With Intellectual Disabilities in Trauma Treatment Research.\",\"authors\":\"Zackary F Moore, Anna W Wright, Carine E Leslie, Allison D'Aguilar, Ananda B Amstadter, Ruth C Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jir.70011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience disparities in mental health care despite experiencing increased exposure to trauma such as physical, emotional and sexual abuse. Studies have suggested that the exclusion of people with ID from medical research may contribute to disparities in health care. It is currently unknown to what extent children with ID are excluded from trauma treatment research.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 62) included in the most up-to-date International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) clinical care guidelines meta-analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments were reanalysed and coded to determine whether or not children with ID or other developmental disabilities that co-occur with ID were excluded based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were double-coded by the research team. The corresponding authors of the studies were asked to complete a survey rating the likelihood that children with ID would have been eligible for the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the studies, 61.3% reviewed reported exclusion criteria based on a diagnosis of intellectual disability, cognitive impairment, autism spectrum disorder, organic/neurological conditions, or other related terms (e.g., 'significant learning difficulties'). Operationalisation of exclusion criteria was sparse. Few studies reported the number of children excluded from trials based on an ID diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The evidence base for the ISTSS clinical care guidelines of child PTSD treatment is not representative of children with ID. Improved documentation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, reporting of disability as a demographic characteristic, and inclusion of children with ID in PTSD treatment trials are needed to improve representation of children with ID in PTSD research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70011\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual Disability Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jir.70011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:智力残疾儿童(ID)在精神卫生保健方面存在差异,尽管他们经历了更多的创伤,如身体、情感和性虐待。研究表明,将ID患者排除在医学研究之外可能会导致医疗保健方面的差异。目前尚不清楚有ID的儿童在多大程度上被排除在创伤治疗研究之外。方法:重新分析所有纳入最新国际创伤应激研究学会(ISTSS)临床护理指南创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)治疗荟萃分析的随机对照试验(rct) (n = 62),并对其进行编码,以确定是否根据纳入/排除标准排除患有ID或与ID同时发生的其他发育障碍的儿童。研究小组对文章进行了双重编码。研究的通讯作者被要求完成一项调查,评估患有ID的儿童有资格参加研究的可能性。结果:在这些研究中,61.3%的研究回顾了基于智力残疾、认知障碍、自闭症谱系障碍、器官/神经系统疾病或其他相关术语(例如“显著学习困难”)诊断的报告排除标准。排除标准的操作很少。很少有研究报告了基于ID诊断而被排除在试验之外的儿童数量。结论:ISTSS儿童创伤后应激障碍治疗临床护理指南的证据基础不能代表ID儿童。需要改进纳入/排除标准的文件,将残疾作为人口统计学特征的报告,以及将ID儿童纳入PTSD治疗试验,以提高ID儿童在PTSD研究中的代表性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Call for Inclusion: Children With Intellectual Disabilities in Trauma Treatment Research.

Background: Children with intellectual disabilities (ID) experience disparities in mental health care despite experiencing increased exposure to trauma such as physical, emotional and sexual abuse. Studies have suggested that the exclusion of people with ID from medical research may contribute to disparities in health care. It is currently unknown to what extent children with ID are excluded from trauma treatment research.

Methods: All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) (n = 62) included in the most up-to-date International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies (ISTSS) clinical care guidelines meta-analysis of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) treatments were reanalysed and coded to determine whether or not children with ID or other developmental disabilities that co-occur with ID were excluded based on inclusion/exclusion criteria. Articles were double-coded by the research team. The corresponding authors of the studies were asked to complete a survey rating the likelihood that children with ID would have been eligible for the study.

Results: Of the studies, 61.3% reviewed reported exclusion criteria based on a diagnosis of intellectual disability, cognitive impairment, autism spectrum disorder, organic/neurological conditions, or other related terms (e.g., 'significant learning difficulties'). Operationalisation of exclusion criteria was sparse. Few studies reported the number of children excluded from trials based on an ID diagnosis.

Conclusions: The evidence base for the ISTSS clinical care guidelines of child PTSD treatment is not representative of children with ID. Improved documentation of inclusion/exclusion criteria, reporting of disability as a demographic characteristic, and inclusion of children with ID in PTSD treatment trials are needed to improve representation of children with ID in PTSD research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
5.60%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: The Journal of Intellectual Disability Research is devoted exclusively to the scientific study of intellectual disability and publishes papers reporting original observations in this field. The subject matter is broad and includes, but is not restricted to, findings from biological, educational, genetic, medical, psychiatric, psychological and sociological studies, and ethical, philosophical, and legal contributions that increase knowledge on the treatment and prevention of intellectual disability and of associated impairments and disabilities, and/or inform public policy and practice. Expert reviews on themes in which recent research has produced notable advances will be included. Such reviews will normally be by invitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信