{"title":"身份不稳定、本体论不安全与苏格兰移民身份不稳定家庭儿童的福祉","authors":"Calum Lindsay","doi":"10.1002/psp.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Migration policy in the United Kingdom continues to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable forms of migration, using increasingly punitive policy provisions designed to make life unliveable for those outside narrowing frames of acceptability. Part of this policy involves broadening and deepening precarious forms of status while denying routes to permanence to those considered less desirable. This includes many families with children. Although existing quantitative studies have established links between precarious immigration status, post‐migration stressors and poor mental health outcomes for children and for parents, these studies lack insight into everyday life within a hostile immigration environment, including how people actively encounter and navigate life in precarity. This paper presents new qualitative research exploring the impacts of precarious and uncertain immigration status on the wellbeing of children in the United Kingdom. It uses a novel theoretical framework combining the concept of ontological security with Bourdieu's theory of practice to determine how policies of precaritisation result in the denial of access to resources that contribute to crucial elements of wellbeing. It also provides insight into how people actively navigate these challenges to resist the pressures of exclusionary policy.","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Status Precarity, Ontological Insecurity and the Wellbeing of Children in Families With Precarious Immigration Status in Scotland\",\"authors\":\"Calum Lindsay\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp.70091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Migration policy in the United Kingdom continues to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable forms of migration, using increasingly punitive policy provisions designed to make life unliveable for those outside narrowing frames of acceptability. Part of this policy involves broadening and deepening precarious forms of status while denying routes to permanence to those considered less desirable. This includes many families with children. Although existing quantitative studies have established links between precarious immigration status, post‐migration stressors and poor mental health outcomes for children and for parents, these studies lack insight into everyday life within a hostile immigration environment, including how people actively encounter and navigate life in precarity. This paper presents new qualitative research exploring the impacts of precarious and uncertain immigration status on the wellbeing of children in the United Kingdom. It uses a novel theoretical framework combining the concept of ontological security with Bourdieu's theory of practice to determine how policies of precaritisation result in the denial of access to resources that contribute to crucial elements of wellbeing. It also provides insight into how people actively navigate these challenges to resist the pressures of exclusionary policy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70091\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.70091","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Status Precarity, Ontological Insecurity and the Wellbeing of Children in Families With Precarious Immigration Status in Scotland
Migration policy in the United Kingdom continues to distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable forms of migration, using increasingly punitive policy provisions designed to make life unliveable for those outside narrowing frames of acceptability. Part of this policy involves broadening and deepening precarious forms of status while denying routes to permanence to those considered less desirable. This includes many families with children. Although existing quantitative studies have established links between precarious immigration status, post‐migration stressors and poor mental health outcomes for children and for parents, these studies lack insight into everyday life within a hostile immigration environment, including how people actively encounter and navigate life in precarity. This paper presents new qualitative research exploring the impacts of precarious and uncertain immigration status on the wellbeing of children in the United Kingdom. It uses a novel theoretical framework combining the concept of ontological security with Bourdieu's theory of practice to determine how policies of precaritisation result in the denial of access to resources that contribute to crucial elements of wellbeing. It also provides insight into how people actively navigate these challenges to resist the pressures of exclusionary policy.
期刊介绍:
Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research