基于文本的基因-疾病关联识别的混合深度学习模型。

IF 2.2 4区 工程技术 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Bioimpacts Pub Date : 2025-06-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.34172/bi.31226
Noor Fadhil Jumaa, Jafar Razmara, Sepideh Parvizpour, Jaber Karimpour
{"title":"基于文本的基因-疾病关联识别的混合深度学习模型。","authors":"Noor Fadhil Jumaa, Jafar Razmara, Sepideh Parvizpour, Jaber Karimpour","doi":"10.34172/bi.31226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying gene-disease associations is crucial for advancing medical research and improving clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the rapid expansion of biomedical literature poses significant obstacles to extracting meaningful relationships from extensive text collections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses deep learning techniques to automate this process, using publicly available datasets (EU-ADR, GAD, and SNPPhenA) to classify these associations accurately. Each dataset underwent rigorous pre-processing, including entity identification and preparation, word embedding using pre-trained Word2Vec and fastText models, and position embedding to capture semantic and contextual relationships within the text. In this research, three deep learning-based hybrid models have been implemented and contrasted, including CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and CNN-GRU-LSTM. Each model has been equipped with attentional mechanisms to enhance its performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal that the CNN-GRU model achieved the highest accuracy of 91.23% on the SNPPhenA dataset, while the CNN-GRU-LSTM model attained an accuracy of 90.14% on the EU-ADR dataset. Meanwhile, the CNN-LSTM model demonstrated superior performance on the GAD dataset, achieving an accuracy of 84.90%. Compared to previous state-of-the-art methods, such as BioBERT-based models, our hybrid approach demonstrates superior classification performance by effectively capturing local and sequential features without relying on heavy pre-training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed models and their evaluation data are available at https://github.com/NoorFadhil/Deep-GDAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":48614,"journal":{"name":"Bioimpacts","volume":"15 ","pages":"31226"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319213/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybrid deep learning models for text-based identification of gene-disease associations.\",\"authors\":\"Noor Fadhil Jumaa, Jafar Razmara, Sepideh Parvizpour, Jaber Karimpour\",\"doi\":\"10.34172/bi.31226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p></p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Identifying gene-disease associations is crucial for advancing medical research and improving clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the rapid expansion of biomedical literature poses significant obstacles to extracting meaningful relationships from extensive text collections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study uses deep learning techniques to automate this process, using publicly available datasets (EU-ADR, GAD, and SNPPhenA) to classify these associations accurately. Each dataset underwent rigorous pre-processing, including entity identification and preparation, word embedding using pre-trained Word2Vec and fastText models, and position embedding to capture semantic and contextual relationships within the text. In this research, three deep learning-based hybrid models have been implemented and contrasted, including CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and CNN-GRU-LSTM. Each model has been equipped with attentional mechanisms to enhance its performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our findings reveal that the CNN-GRU model achieved the highest accuracy of 91.23% on the SNPPhenA dataset, while the CNN-GRU-LSTM model attained an accuracy of 90.14% on the EU-ADR dataset. Meanwhile, the CNN-LSTM model demonstrated superior performance on the GAD dataset, achieving an accuracy of 84.90%. Compared to previous state-of-the-art methods, such as BioBERT-based models, our hybrid approach demonstrates superior classification performance by effectively capturing local and sequential features without relying on heavy pre-training.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The developed models and their evaluation data are available at https://github.com/NoorFadhil/Deep-GDAE.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bioimpacts\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"31226\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12319213/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bioimpacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.31226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioimpacts","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/bi.31226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

识别基因与疾病的关联对于推进医学研究和改善临床结果至关重要。然而,快速扩张的生物医学文献对从广泛的文本集合中提取有意义的关系构成了重大障碍。方法:本研究使用深度学习技术自动化这一过程,使用公开可用的数据集(EU-ADR, GAD和SNPPhenA)准确分类这些关联。每个数据集都经过严格的预处理,包括实体识别和准备,使用预训练的Word2Vec和fastText模型进行词嵌入,以及位置嵌入以捕获文本中的语义和上下文关系。本研究实现了CNN-LSTM、CNN-GRU和CNN-GRU- lstm三种基于深度学习的混合模型并进行了对比。每个模型都配备了注意机制,以提高其性能。结果:CNN-GRU模型在SNPPhenA数据集上的准确率最高,为91.23%,而CNN-GRU- lstm模型在EU-ADR数据集上的准确率为90.14%。同时,CNN-LSTM模型在GAD数据集上表现出优异的性能,准确率达到84.90%。与之前最先进的方法(如基于biobert的模型)相比,我们的混合方法通过有效地捕获局部和顺序特征而不依赖于大量的预训练,展示了卓越的分类性能。结论:建立的模型及其评价数据可在https://github.com/NoorFadhil/Deep-GDAE上获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Hybrid deep learning models for text-based identification of gene-disease associations.

Hybrid deep learning models for text-based identification of gene-disease associations.

Hybrid deep learning models for text-based identification of gene-disease associations.

Hybrid deep learning models for text-based identification of gene-disease associations.

Introduction: Identifying gene-disease associations is crucial for advancing medical research and improving clinical outcomes. Nevertheless, the rapid expansion of biomedical literature poses significant obstacles to extracting meaningful relationships from extensive text collections.

Methods: This study uses deep learning techniques to automate this process, using publicly available datasets (EU-ADR, GAD, and SNPPhenA) to classify these associations accurately. Each dataset underwent rigorous pre-processing, including entity identification and preparation, word embedding using pre-trained Word2Vec and fastText models, and position embedding to capture semantic and contextual relationships within the text. In this research, three deep learning-based hybrid models have been implemented and contrasted, including CNN-LSTM, CNN-GRU, and CNN-GRU-LSTM. Each model has been equipped with attentional mechanisms to enhance its performance.

Results: Our findings reveal that the CNN-GRU model achieved the highest accuracy of 91.23% on the SNPPhenA dataset, while the CNN-GRU-LSTM model attained an accuracy of 90.14% on the EU-ADR dataset. Meanwhile, the CNN-LSTM model demonstrated superior performance on the GAD dataset, achieving an accuracy of 84.90%. Compared to previous state-of-the-art methods, such as BioBERT-based models, our hybrid approach demonstrates superior classification performance by effectively capturing local and sequential features without relying on heavy pre-training.

Conclusion: The developed models and their evaluation data are available at https://github.com/NoorFadhil/Deep-GDAE.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bioimpacts
Bioimpacts Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmaceutical Science
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
36
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: BioImpacts (BI) is a peer-reviewed multidisciplinary international journal, covering original research articles, reviews, commentaries, hypotheses, methodologies, and visions/reflections dealing with all aspects of biological and biomedical researches at molecular, cellular, functional and translational dimensions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信