EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Ilen Röhe, Katerina Theodoridou, Montserrat Anguita, Matteo L. Innocenti, Marianna Kujawa, Jordi Ortuño
{"title":"由(Komagataella phaffii CGMCC 7.370)生产的6-植酸酶(vtr -植酸酶)组成的饲料添加剂对所有猪和生长家禽品种的效果(Victory enzyme GmbH)","authors":"EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Ilen Röhe, Katerina Theodoridou, Montserrat Anguita, Matteo L. Innocenti, Marianna Kujawa, Jordi Ortuño","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the efficacy of 6-phytase produced by <i>Komagataella phaffii</i> CGMCC 7.370 (VTR-phytase) as a zootechnical feed additive for all pigs and growing poultry species. The additive is intended to be commercialised in two formulations: liquid and powder. In a previous opinion the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for target species, consumers and environment. The FEEDAP Panel deemed that both formulations of the additive are not skin and eyes irritant but should be considered skin and respiratory sensitisers. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that VTR-phytase has potential to be efficacious in laying hens at 1000 U phytase/kg complete feed, and this conclusion was extended to all laying and reproductive poultry. However, due to the lack of sufficient data, the Panel was not in a position to conclude on the efficacy for poultry for fattening or reared for laying/breeding, and in any porcine species. The applicant provided new trials to support the efficacy of the additive on those target species. Based on the data provided in the previous and current application, the Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical additive for all poultry for fattening and reared for laying/breeding and reproductive porcine species at 500 U phytase/kg complete feed and all porcine species for fattening and reared for reproduction at 750 U phytase/kg complete feed.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of a feed additive consisting of 6-phytase produced by (Komagataella phaffii CGMCC 7.370) (VTR-phytase) for all pigs and growing poultry species (Victory Enzymes GmbH)\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP), Roberto Edoardo Villa, Giovanna Azimonti, Eleftherios Bonos, Henrik Christensen, Mojca Durjava, Birgit Dusemund, Ronette Gehring, Boet Glandorf, Maryline Kouba, Marta López-Alonso, Francesca Marcon, Carlo Nebbia, Alena Pechová, Miguel Prieto-Maradona, Ilen Röhe, Katerina Theodoridou, Montserrat Anguita, Matteo L. Innocenti, Marianna Kujawa, Jordi Ortuño\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the efficacy of 6-phytase produced by <i>Komagataella phaffii</i> CGMCC 7.370 (VTR-phytase) as a zootechnical feed additive for all pigs and growing poultry species. The additive is intended to be commercialised in two formulations: liquid and powder. In a previous opinion the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for target species, consumers and environment. The FEEDAP Panel deemed that both formulations of the additive are not skin and eyes irritant but should be considered skin and respiratory sensitisers. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that VTR-phytase has potential to be efficacious in laying hens at 1000 U phytase/kg complete feed, and this conclusion was extended to all laying and reproductive poultry. However, due to the lack of sufficient data, the Panel was not in a position to conclude on the efficacy for poultry for fattening or reared for laying/breeding, and in any porcine species. The applicant provided new trials to support the efficacy of the additive on those target species. Based on the data provided in the previous and current application, the Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical additive for all poultry for fattening and reared for laying/breeding and reproductive porcine species at 500 U phytase/kg complete feed and all porcine species for fattening and reared for reproduction at 750 U phytase/kg complete feed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9556","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Efficacy of a feed additive consisting of 6-phytase produced by (Komagataella phaffii CGMCC 7.370) (VTR-phytase) for all pigs and growing poultry species (Victory Enzymes GmbH)
Following a request from the European Commission, EFSA was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the efficacy of 6-phytase produced by Komagataella phaffii CGMCC 7.370 (VTR-phytase) as a zootechnical feed additive for all pigs and growing poultry species. The additive is intended to be commercialised in two formulations: liquid and powder. In a previous opinion the FEEDAP Panel concluded that the additive is safe for target species, consumers and environment. The FEEDAP Panel deemed that both formulations of the additive are not skin and eyes irritant but should be considered skin and respiratory sensitisers. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that VTR-phytase has potential to be efficacious in laying hens at 1000 U phytase/kg complete feed, and this conclusion was extended to all laying and reproductive poultry. However, due to the lack of sufficient data, the Panel was not in a position to conclude on the efficacy for poultry for fattening or reared for laying/breeding, and in any porcine species. The applicant provided new trials to support the efficacy of the additive on those target species. Based on the data provided in the previous and current application, the Panel concluded that the additive has a potential to be efficacious as a zootechnical additive for all poultry for fattening and reared for laying/breeding and reproductive porcine species at 500 U phytase/kg complete feed and all porcine species for fattening and reared for reproduction at 750 U phytase/kg complete feed.
期刊介绍:
The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.