{"title":"自由移民制度中的核心-边缘不平等:一种比较政治经济学方法","authors":"Max Nagel","doi":"10.1002/psp.70079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines epistemic imbalances in the EU migration literature and their connection to socioeconomic inequalities. While scholarship has largely focused on immigration to EU core countries, emigration—particularly from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)— remains underexplored. Through a meta-review of 1563 CEE-focused migration studies (2007–2022) and 9801 studies on EU core countries, the article identifies knowledge silos and academic regionalism as two key challenges. It argues that these structural imbalances hinder comprehensive analyses of migration's socioeconomic effects and policy responses to them. To address this, the article advances a Comparative Political Economy lens to show how the varying structure of interdependent national economies shape these effects and how governments introduce policies to respond to them. It is applied to a case study of Poland's PiS government (2015–2023) to illustrate how peripheral countries can navigate the unequal effects of liberal migration regimes. The findings underscore the need for integrated, cross-regional and transdisciplinary approaches to account for the interdependence between core and peripheral countries in explaining socioeconomic effects of international migration.</p>","PeriodicalId":48067,"journal":{"name":"Population Space and Place","volume":"31 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70079","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Core-Periphery Inequalities in Liberal Migration Regimes: A Comparative Political Economy Approach\",\"authors\":\"Max Nagel\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/psp.70079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article examines epistemic imbalances in the EU migration literature and their connection to socioeconomic inequalities. While scholarship has largely focused on immigration to EU core countries, emigration—particularly from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)— remains underexplored. Through a meta-review of 1563 CEE-focused migration studies (2007–2022) and 9801 studies on EU core countries, the article identifies knowledge silos and academic regionalism as two key challenges. It argues that these structural imbalances hinder comprehensive analyses of migration's socioeconomic effects and policy responses to them. To address this, the article advances a Comparative Political Economy lens to show how the varying structure of interdependent national economies shape these effects and how governments introduce policies to respond to them. It is applied to a case study of Poland's PiS government (2015–2023) to illustrate how peripheral countries can navigate the unequal effects of liberal migration regimes. The findings underscore the need for integrated, cross-regional and transdisciplinary approaches to account for the interdependence between core and peripheral countries in explaining socioeconomic effects of international migration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/psp.70079\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Space and Place\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70079\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Space and Place","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/psp.70079","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Core-Periphery Inequalities in Liberal Migration Regimes: A Comparative Political Economy Approach
This article examines epistemic imbalances in the EU migration literature and their connection to socioeconomic inequalities. While scholarship has largely focused on immigration to EU core countries, emigration—particularly from Central and Eastern Europe (CEE)— remains underexplored. Through a meta-review of 1563 CEE-focused migration studies (2007–2022) and 9801 studies on EU core countries, the article identifies knowledge silos and academic regionalism as two key challenges. It argues that these structural imbalances hinder comprehensive analyses of migration's socioeconomic effects and policy responses to them. To address this, the article advances a Comparative Political Economy lens to show how the varying structure of interdependent national economies shape these effects and how governments introduce policies to respond to them. It is applied to a case study of Poland's PiS government (2015–2023) to illustrate how peripheral countries can navigate the unequal effects of liberal migration regimes. The findings underscore the need for integrated, cross-regional and transdisciplinary approaches to account for the interdependence between core and peripheral countries in explaining socioeconomic effects of international migration.
期刊介绍:
Population, Space and Place aims to be the leading English-language research journal in the field of geographical population studies. It intends to: - Inform population researchers of the best theoretical and empirical research on topics related to population, space and place - Promote and further enhance the international standing of population research through the exchange of views on what constitutes best research practice - Facilitate debate on issues of policy relevance and encourage the widest possible discussion and dissemination of the applications of research on populations - Review and evaluate the significance of recent research findings and provide an international platform where researchers can discuss the future course of population research