一种机器学习方法,使用来自低成本的基于运动的评估系统的离散结果测量进行震荡组分类

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Jacob M. Thomas , Jamie B. Hall , Rebecca Bliss , Emily Leary , Stephen P. Sayers , Praveen Rao , Trent M. Guess
{"title":"一种机器学习方法,使用来自低成本的基于运动的评估系统的离散结果测量进行震荡组分类","authors":"Jacob M. Thomas ,&nbsp;Jamie B. Hall ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bliss ,&nbsp;Emily Leary ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Sayers ,&nbsp;Praveen Rao ,&nbsp;Trent M. Guess","doi":"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Measurable neuromotor control deficits during functional task performance could provide objective criteria to aid in concussion diagnosis. However, many tools which measure these constructs are unidimensional and not clinically feasible. The purpose of this study was to assess the classification accuracy of a machine learning model using features measured by a clinically feasible movement-based assessment system (Mizzou Point-of-care Assessment System (MPASS) between athletes with and without concussion. Forty collegiate athletes participated. Twenty (19.40 ± 1.04 yrs., 11 females) suffered concussion within two weeks of data collection (5.40 ± 3.68 days). Twenty (19.85 ± 1.20 yrs.) sex, sport, and position-matched athletes had no concussions in the past year. All participants completed three 30-second static balance trials with eyes closed on foam surface under both single task and cognitive dual task conditions, four trials of gait under normal, head shaking, and dual task conditions, and reaction time tasks. Kinematics, kinetics, and reaction times were recorded by MPASS. Measures were used as features for a XGBoost machine learning model. Five-fold cross-validation yielded mean (across 5-folds): 82.5 % accuracy, 75 % sensitivity, 90 % specificity, 88.2 % positive predictive value, and 78.3 % negative predictive value. Results indicate promise for using movement-based features from a low-cost movement-based assessment system to improve the objectivity of concussion diagnosis decision-making.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49836,"journal":{"name":"Medical Engineering & Physics","volume":"144 ","pages":"Article 104402"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A machine learning approach to concussive group classification using discrete outcome measures from a low-cost movement-based assessment system\",\"authors\":\"Jacob M. Thomas ,&nbsp;Jamie B. Hall ,&nbsp;Rebecca Bliss ,&nbsp;Emily Leary ,&nbsp;Stephen P. Sayers ,&nbsp;Praveen Rao ,&nbsp;Trent M. Guess\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.medengphy.2025.104402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Measurable neuromotor control deficits during functional task performance could provide objective criteria to aid in concussion diagnosis. However, many tools which measure these constructs are unidimensional and not clinically feasible. The purpose of this study was to assess the classification accuracy of a machine learning model using features measured by a clinically feasible movement-based assessment system (Mizzou Point-of-care Assessment System (MPASS) between athletes with and without concussion. Forty collegiate athletes participated. Twenty (19.40 ± 1.04 yrs., 11 females) suffered concussion within two weeks of data collection (5.40 ± 3.68 days). Twenty (19.85 ± 1.20 yrs.) sex, sport, and position-matched athletes had no concussions in the past year. All participants completed three 30-second static balance trials with eyes closed on foam surface under both single task and cognitive dual task conditions, four trials of gait under normal, head shaking, and dual task conditions, and reaction time tasks. Kinematics, kinetics, and reaction times were recorded by MPASS. Measures were used as features for a XGBoost machine learning model. Five-fold cross-validation yielded mean (across 5-folds): 82.5 % accuracy, 75 % sensitivity, 90 % specificity, 88.2 % positive predictive value, and 78.3 % negative predictive value. Results indicate promise for using movement-based features from a low-cost movement-based assessment system to improve the objectivity of concussion diagnosis decision-making.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49836,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"volume\":\"144 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104402\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Engineering & Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001213\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Engineering & Physics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1350453325001213","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在功能性任务表现中可测量的神经运动控制缺陷可为脑震荡诊断提供客观标准。然而,许多测量这些结构的工具是单向度的,在临床上不可行。本研究的目的是评估机器学习模型的分类准确性,使用临床可行的基于运动的评估系统(Mizzou Point-of-care assessment system, MPASS)在有脑震荡和没有脑震荡的运动员之间测量的特征。40名大学生运动员参加了比赛。20(19.40±1.04)年。11例女性)在收集数据的2周内(5.40±3.68天)出现脑震荡。20名(19.85±1.20岁)性别、运动和位置匹配的运动员在过去一年中没有发生过脑震荡。所有被试分别在单任务和认知双任务条件下完成3个30秒闭眼泡沫表面静态平衡试验,在正常、摇头和双任务条件下完成4个步态试验,以及反应时间任务。通过MPASS记录运动学、动力学和反应时间。度量被用作XGBoost机器学习模型的特征。5倍交叉验证的平均准确率为82.5%,灵敏度为75%,特异性为90%,阳性预测值为88.2%,阴性预测值为78.3%。结果表明,利用基于运动特征的低成本评估系统可以提高脑震荡诊断决策的客观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A machine learning approach to concussive group classification using discrete outcome measures from a low-cost movement-based assessment system
Measurable neuromotor control deficits during functional task performance could provide objective criteria to aid in concussion diagnosis. However, many tools which measure these constructs are unidimensional and not clinically feasible. The purpose of this study was to assess the classification accuracy of a machine learning model using features measured by a clinically feasible movement-based assessment system (Mizzou Point-of-care Assessment System (MPASS) between athletes with and without concussion. Forty collegiate athletes participated. Twenty (19.40 ± 1.04 yrs., 11 females) suffered concussion within two weeks of data collection (5.40 ± 3.68 days). Twenty (19.85 ± 1.20 yrs.) sex, sport, and position-matched athletes had no concussions in the past year. All participants completed three 30-second static balance trials with eyes closed on foam surface under both single task and cognitive dual task conditions, four trials of gait under normal, head shaking, and dual task conditions, and reaction time tasks. Kinematics, kinetics, and reaction times were recorded by MPASS. Measures were used as features for a XGBoost machine learning model. Five-fold cross-validation yielded mean (across 5-folds): 82.5 % accuracy, 75 % sensitivity, 90 % specificity, 88.2 % positive predictive value, and 78.3 % negative predictive value. Results indicate promise for using movement-based features from a low-cost movement-based assessment system to improve the objectivity of concussion diagnosis decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Engineering & Physics
Medical Engineering & Physics 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3.0 months
期刊介绍: Medical Engineering & Physics provides a forum for the publication of the latest developments in biomedical engineering, and reflects the essential multidisciplinary nature of the subject. The journal publishes in-depth critical reviews, scientific papers and technical notes. Our focus encompasses the application of the basic principles of physics and engineering to the development of medical devices and technology, with the ultimate aim of producing improvements in the quality of health care.Topics covered include biomechanics, biomaterials, mechanobiology, rehabilitation engineering, biomedical signal processing and medical device development. Medical Engineering & Physics aims to keep both engineers and clinicians abreast of the latest applications of technology to health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信