应用于动物的生物技术的新发展:对当前EFSA动物风险评估指南的充分性和充分性的评估

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), Josep Casacuberta, Francisco Barro, Albert Braeuning, Ruud de Maagd, Michelle M. Epstein, Thomas Frenzel, Jean-Luc Gallois, Frits Koning, Antoine Messéan, F. Javier Moreno, Fabien Nogué, Alan H. Schulman, Christoph Tebbe, Eve Veromann, Leslie Firbank, Debora Glandorf, Mette S. Herskin, Simon Geoffrey Lillico, Robin Ornsrud, Anna Troedsson-Wargelius, Michele Ardizzone, Paolo Lenzi, Ana M. Camargo, Nikoletta Papadopoulou, Reinhilde Schoonjans, Marika Vitali, Giovanni Savoini
{"title":"应用于动物的生物技术的新发展:对当前EFSA动物风险评估指南的充分性和充分性的评估","authors":"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Leslie Firbank,&nbsp;Debora Glandorf,&nbsp;Mette S. Herskin,&nbsp;Simon Geoffrey Lillico,&nbsp;Robin Ornsrud,&nbsp;Anna Troedsson-Wargelius,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Paolo Lenzi,&nbsp;Ana M. Camargo,&nbsp;Nikoletta Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Reinhilde Schoonjans,&nbsp;Marika Vitali,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>EFSA was requested by the European Commission to provide a scientific opinion on new developments in biotechnology, including new genomic techniques, as applied to animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses. A horizon-scanning exercise identified a variety of animals obtained with new genomic techniques, with the potential to reach the EU market in the short, medium and long term. No novel hazards have been identified that are linked to either the modification process or the newly introduced trait, when SDN-1, SDN-2 and comparable techniques (e.g. base editing or prime editing) were compared to established genomic techniques (EGTs) or conventional breeding. Hazards posed by SDN-3 are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs and the targeted insertion may reduce the potential hazards associated with the disruption of endogenous genes and/or regulatory elements in the recipient genome. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced transgenic or intragenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced cisgenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by conventional breeding. Off-target mutations from genome editing are similar in nature to those from conventional breeding and do not pose novel hazards. Consequently, based on the currently available data, no new potential hazards, and thus, no new risks to humans, animals or the environment have been identified. A thorough evaluation of existing EFSA guidance documents for the risk assessment of GM animals revealed that their principles and recommendations provide the basis for assessing the risks of new genomic technique (NGT) animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses; however, the current texts cover only partially some areas (e.g. animal health and welfare) and may need updates, adaptations or enhancements on a case-by-case basis to fully address NGT-related risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":"23 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO),&nbsp;Josep Casacuberta,&nbsp;Francisco Barro,&nbsp;Albert Braeuning,&nbsp;Ruud de Maagd,&nbsp;Michelle M. Epstein,&nbsp;Thomas Frenzel,&nbsp;Jean-Luc Gallois,&nbsp;Frits Koning,&nbsp;Antoine Messéan,&nbsp;F. Javier Moreno,&nbsp;Fabien Nogué,&nbsp;Alan H. Schulman,&nbsp;Christoph Tebbe,&nbsp;Eve Veromann,&nbsp;Leslie Firbank,&nbsp;Debora Glandorf,&nbsp;Mette S. Herskin,&nbsp;Simon Geoffrey Lillico,&nbsp;Robin Ornsrud,&nbsp;Anna Troedsson-Wargelius,&nbsp;Michele Ardizzone,&nbsp;Paolo Lenzi,&nbsp;Ana M. Camargo,&nbsp;Nikoletta Papadopoulou,&nbsp;Reinhilde Schoonjans,&nbsp;Marika Vitali,&nbsp;Giovanni Savoini\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>EFSA was requested by the European Commission to provide a scientific opinion on new developments in biotechnology, including new genomic techniques, as applied to animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses. A horizon-scanning exercise identified a variety of animals obtained with new genomic techniques, with the potential to reach the EU market in the short, medium and long term. No novel hazards have been identified that are linked to either the modification process or the newly introduced trait, when SDN-1, SDN-2 and comparable techniques (e.g. base editing or prime editing) were compared to established genomic techniques (EGTs) or conventional breeding. Hazards posed by SDN-3 are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs and the targeted insertion may reduce the potential hazards associated with the disruption of endogenous genes and/or regulatory elements in the recipient genome. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced transgenic or intragenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced cisgenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by conventional breeding. Off-target mutations from genome editing are similar in nature to those from conventional breeding and do not pose novel hazards. Consequently, based on the currently available data, no new potential hazards, and thus, no new risks to humans, animals or the environment have been identified. A thorough evaluation of existing EFSA guidance documents for the risk assessment of GM animals revealed that their principles and recommendations provide the basis for assessing the risks of new genomic technique (NGT) animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses; however, the current texts cover only partially some areas (e.g. animal health and welfare) and may need updates, adaptations or enhancements on a case-by-case basis to fully address NGT-related risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":\"23 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2025.9566","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧洲委员会要求欧洲食品安全局就生物技术的新发展提供科学意见,包括新的基因组技术,应用于用于食品、饲料和其他农业用途的动物。一项横向扫描试验确定了用新的基因组技术获得的各种动物,这些动物有可能在短期、中期和长期进入欧盟市场。当将SDN-1、SDN-2和可比较的技术(如碱基编辑或引物编辑)与已建立的基因组技术(EGTs)或常规育种进行比较时,没有发现与修饰过程或新引入的性状相关的新危害。SDN-3造成的危害与egt造成的危害具有相同的性质,靶向插入可能会减少与受体基因组中内源基因和/或调控元件的破坏相关的潜在危害。引入转基因或基因内DNA序列的新性状所带来的危害与egt所带来的危害具有相同的性质。由引入顺基因DNA序列产生的新性状所带来的危害与传统育种所带来的危害具有相同的性质。基因组编辑产生的脱靶突变在性质上与传统育种产生的脱靶突变相似,不会造成新的危害。因此,根据目前可获得的数据,没有发现新的潜在危害,因此没有发现对人类、动物或环境的新风险。对现有的欧洲食品安全局转基因动物风险评估指导文件的全面评估表明,其原则和建议为评估用于食品、饲料和其他农业用途的新基因组技术(NGT)动物的风险提供了基础;然而,目前的案文仅部分涵盖某些领域(例如动物健康和福利),可能需要逐案更新、调整或增强,以充分解决与ngt有关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

New developments in biotechnology applied to animals: An assessment of the adequacy and sufficiency of current EFSA guidance for animal risk assessment

EFSA was requested by the European Commission to provide a scientific opinion on new developments in biotechnology, including new genomic techniques, as applied to animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses. A horizon-scanning exercise identified a variety of animals obtained with new genomic techniques, with the potential to reach the EU market in the short, medium and long term. No novel hazards have been identified that are linked to either the modification process or the newly introduced trait, when SDN-1, SDN-2 and comparable techniques (e.g. base editing or prime editing) were compared to established genomic techniques (EGTs) or conventional breeding. Hazards posed by SDN-3 are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs and the targeted insertion may reduce the potential hazards associated with the disruption of endogenous genes and/or regulatory elements in the recipient genome. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced transgenic or intragenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by EGTs. Hazards posed by the new trait resulting from the introduced cisgenic DNA sequence are of the same nature as those posed by conventional breeding. Off-target mutations from genome editing are similar in nature to those from conventional breeding and do not pose novel hazards. Consequently, based on the currently available data, no new potential hazards, and thus, no new risks to humans, animals or the environment have been identified. A thorough evaluation of existing EFSA guidance documents for the risk assessment of GM animals revealed that their principles and recommendations provide the basis for assessing the risks of new genomic technique (NGT) animals for food, feed and other agricultural uses; however, the current texts cover only partially some areas (e.g. animal health and welfare) and may need updates, adaptations or enhancements on a case-by-case basis to fully address NGT-related risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信