测试成人和青少年EQ-5D-Y-5L的评估:来自五国研究的结果及其对描述系统的影响。

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Tianxin Pan, Juan Manuel Ramos-Goni, Bram Roudijk, Shitong Xie, Feng Xie, Zhihao Yang, Brendan Mulhern, Richard Norman, Nancy Devlin
{"title":"测试成人和青少年EQ-5D-Y-5L的评估:来自五国研究的结果及其对描述系统的影响。","authors":"Tianxin Pan, Juan Manuel Ramos-Goni, Bram Roudijk, Shitong Xie, Feng Xie, Zhihao Yang, Brendan Mulhern, Richard Norman, Nancy Devlin","doi":"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The EQ-5D-Y-5L (\"Y-5L\") is a new health-related quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Value sets for the Y-5L are planned. This article aimed to test the ability of adult and adolescent respondents to differentiate the ordinal levels of the Y-5L in valuation tasks and to explore the characteristics of stated preferences for the Y-5L between adults and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected latent-scale discrete choice experiment data via an online survey of adults (≥18 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) in Australia, Canada, China, The Netherlands, and Spain. A D-Efficient design consisting of 192 choice pairs was grouped into 16 blocks of 12 choice tasks per respondent. We used mixed-logit models to analyze the data and incremental dummies to represent movements from a less-severe level to its consecutive more-severe level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe preference inversions in adults or adolescents (ie, no statistically significant positive coefficients on the incremental dummies). Adults showed similar preferences for the Y-5L in terms of dimension importance: Pain/Discomfort was considered the most important dimension in all countries except for China; Looking After Myself and Usual Activity were the least important dimensions. In contrast, Mobility was considered the most important dimensions by adolescents in Canada, Spain, and China.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults could differentiate between the Y-5L level labels in valuation tasks, whereas more randomness was observed in adolescents' choices. Observed differences between adult and adolescent stated preferences for the Y-5L raise questions about how these preferences should be reflected in cost-effectiveness analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23508,"journal":{"name":"Value in Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-5L in Adults and Adolescents: Results From a 5-Country Study and Implications for the Descriptive System.\",\"authors\":\"Tianxin Pan, Juan Manuel Ramos-Goni, Bram Roudijk, Shitong Xie, Feng Xie, Zhihao Yang, Brendan Mulhern, Richard Norman, Nancy Devlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The EQ-5D-Y-5L (\\\"Y-5L\\\") is a new health-related quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Value sets for the Y-5L are planned. This article aimed to test the ability of adult and adolescent respondents to differentiate the ordinal levels of the Y-5L in valuation tasks and to explore the characteristics of stated preferences for the Y-5L between adults and adolescents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected latent-scale discrete choice experiment data via an online survey of adults (≥18 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) in Australia, Canada, China, The Netherlands, and Spain. A D-Efficient design consisting of 192 choice pairs was grouped into 16 blocks of 12 choice tasks per respondent. We used mixed-logit models to analyze the data and incremental dummies to represent movements from a less-severe level to its consecutive more-severe level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We did not observe preference inversions in adults or adolescents (ie, no statistically significant positive coefficients on the incremental dummies). Adults showed similar preferences for the Y-5L in terms of dimension importance: Pain/Discomfort was considered the most important dimension in all countries except for China; Looking After Myself and Usual Activity were the least important dimensions. In contrast, Mobility was considered the most important dimensions by adolescents in Canada, Spain, and China.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adults could differentiate between the Y-5L level labels in valuation tasks, whereas more randomness was observed in adolescents' choices. Observed differences between adult and adolescent stated preferences for the Y-5L raise questions about how these preferences should be reflected in cost-effectiveness analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23508,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Value in Health\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Value in Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.016\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Value in Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2025.07.016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:EQ-5D-Y-5L ('Y-5L')是一种新的儿童和青少年健康相关生活质量测量仪器。为Y-5L规划了价值设置。本文旨在检验成人和青少年被调查者在评价任务中区分Y-5L顺序水平的能力,并探讨成人和青少年对Y-5L的陈述偏好特征。方法:我们通过对澳大利亚、加拿大、中国、荷兰和西班牙成年人(≥18岁)和青少年(12-17岁)的在线调查收集潜在量表DCE数据。D-Efficient设计包括192个选择对,被分为16个区块,每个被调查者有12个选择任务。我们使用混合logit模型来分析数据,并使用增量假人来表示从较不严重的水平到连续较严重的水平的运动。结果:我们没有在成人或青少年中观察到偏好反转,即在增量假人上没有统计学上显著的正系数。在维度重要性方面,成年人对Y-5L的偏好相似:除中国外,所有国家都认为疼痛/不适是最重要的维度;照顾自己和日常活动是最不重要的方面。相比之下,加拿大、西班牙和中国的青少年认为流动性是最重要的因素。结论:成人在评价任务中能够区分Y-5L水平标签,而青少年在评价任务中选择的随机性更强。观察到的成人和青少年对Y-5L陈述偏好之间的差异提出了关于这些偏好应如何反映在成本效益分析中的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Testing the Valuation of the EQ-5D-Y-5L in Adults and Adolescents: Results From a 5-Country Study and Implications for the Descriptive System.

Objectives: The EQ-5D-Y-5L ("Y-5L") is a new health-related quality-of-life instrument for children and adolescents. Value sets for the Y-5L are planned. This article aimed to test the ability of adult and adolescent respondents to differentiate the ordinal levels of the Y-5L in valuation tasks and to explore the characteristics of stated preferences for the Y-5L between adults and adolescents.

Methods: We collected latent-scale discrete choice experiment data via an online survey of adults (≥18 years) and adolescents (12-17 years) in Australia, Canada, China, The Netherlands, and Spain. A D-Efficient design consisting of 192 choice pairs was grouped into 16 blocks of 12 choice tasks per respondent. We used mixed-logit models to analyze the data and incremental dummies to represent movements from a less-severe level to its consecutive more-severe level.

Results: We did not observe preference inversions in adults or adolescents (ie, no statistically significant positive coefficients on the incremental dummies). Adults showed similar preferences for the Y-5L in terms of dimension importance: Pain/Discomfort was considered the most important dimension in all countries except for China; Looking After Myself and Usual Activity were the least important dimensions. In contrast, Mobility was considered the most important dimensions by adolescents in Canada, Spain, and China.

Conclusions: Adults could differentiate between the Y-5L level labels in valuation tasks, whereas more randomness was observed in adolescents' choices. Observed differences between adult and adolescent stated preferences for the Y-5L raise questions about how these preferences should be reflected in cost-effectiveness analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Value in Health
Value in Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
3064
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Value in Health contains original research articles for pharmacoeconomics, health economics, and outcomes research (clinical, economic, and patient-reported outcomes/preference-based research), as well as conceptual and health policy articles that provide valuable information for health care decision-makers as well as the research community. As the official journal of ISPOR, Value in Health provides a forum for researchers, as well as health care decision-makers to translate outcomes research into health care decisions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信